Resources are now defined like...
resource fd(int n) { close(n); }
Calling fd with an int will then produce a non-copyable value
that, when dropped, will call close on the given int.
Wrote some small test cases that use while loops and moves, to
make sure the poststate for the loop body gets propagated into the
new prestate and deinitialization gets reflected.
Along with that, rewrite the code for intersecting states. I still
find it dodgy, but I guess I'll continue trying to add more tests.
Also, I'll probably feel better about it once I start formalizing
the algorithm.
Includes assignment operations. Add regression tests for lots of less useful,
less used or unexpected combinations, as well as a selection of compile-fail
tests. Closes#500 (again!)
Modified typestate to throw away any constraints mentioning a
variable on the LHS of an assignment, recv, assign_op, or on
either side of a swap.
Some code cleanup as well.
If you use a function expecting an alias argument in a context that
expects a function expecting a value argument, or vice versa, the
previous error message complained that the number of arguments was
wrong. Fixed the error message to be accurate.
typestate now drops constraints correctly in the post-state of
a move expression or a declaration whose op is a move. It doesn't
yet drop constraints mentioning variables that get updated.
To do this, I had to change typestate to use trit-vectors instead
of bit-vectors, because for every constraint, there are three
possible values: known-to-be-false (e.g. after x <- y, init(y) is
known-to-be-false), known-to-be-true, and unknown. Before, we
conflated known-to-be-false with unknown. But move requires them
to be treated differently. Consider:
(program a)
(a1) x = 1;
(a2) y <- x;
(a3) log x;
(program b)
(b1) x = 1;
(b2) y <- z;
(b3) log x;
With only two values, the postcondition of statement a2 for
constraint init(x) is the same as that of b2: 0. But in (a2)'s
postcondition, init(x) *must* be false, but in (b2)'s condition,
it's just whatever it was in the postcondition of the preceding statement.
This code was causing a bounds check failure:
fn hd[U](&vec[U] v) -> U {
fn hd1(&vec[U] w) -> U {
ret w.(0);
}
ret hd1(v);
}
because in hd1, U was being treated as if it referred to a type
parameter of hd1, rather than referring to the lexically enclosing binding
for U that's part of hd.
I'm actually not sure whether this is a legit program or not. But I wanted
to get rid of the bounds check error, so I assumed that program shouldn't
compile and made it a proper error message.
This involved, in part, changing the ast::def type so that a def_fn
has a "purity" field. This lets the typechecker determine whether
functions defined in other crates are pure.
It also required updating some error messages in tests. As a test
for cross-crate constrained functions, I added a safe_slice function
to std::str (slice(), with one of the asserts replaced with a
function precondition) and some test cases (various versions of
fn-constraint.rs) that call it. Also, I changed "fn" to "pred" for
some of the boolean functions in std::uint.
I noticed that typestate was being lazier than it should be,
because it was only checking typestate for statements and
top-level expression (that is, the expression in a stmt_expr, but
not any subexpressions). So I rewrote the checks in tstate/ck.rs
to use walk, which exposed a few bugs in typestate that I fixed.
Also added some more test cases for if-check.
I don't currently know how to deal with syntax extensions that appear betweeen
an attribute and an item, so this test captures the error that occurs.
Issue #487
I added a "resolved" version of the ast::constr type -- ty::constr_def
-- that has a def_id field instead of an ann_field. This is more
consistent with other types and eliminates some checking.
Incidentally, I removed the def_map argument to the top-level function
in middle::alias, since the ty::ctxt already has a def_map field.
This is a somewhat odd place to put these checks, but the data tracked
by that pass, and the available functions, make it trivial to do such
a check there.
