Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102634 (compiletest: Refactor test rustcflags)
- #102721 (Prevent foreign Rust exceptions from being caught)
- #103415 (filter candidates in pick probe for diagnostics)
- #103618 (Rename some `OwnerId` fields.)
- #103625 (Accept `TyCtxt` instead of `TyCtxtAt` in `Ty::is_*` functions)
- #103653 (Add missing impl blocks for item reexported from private mod in JSON output)
- #103699 (Emit proper error when casting to `dyn*`)
- #103719 (fix typo in `try_reserve` method from `HashMap` and `HashSet`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add missing impl blocks for item reexported from private mod in JSON output
Fixes#102583.
Since we don't inline for the JSON output, the impl blocks from private modules are not present when we generate the output. To go around this limitation, in case the impl block doesn't have `#[doc(hidden)]` and is implementing a public item, we don't strip it.
cc `@fmease` `@aDotInTheVoid`
r? `@notriddle`
Accept `TyCtxt` instead of `TyCtxtAt` in `Ty::is_*` functions
Functions in answer:
- `Ty::is_freeze`
- `Ty::is_sized`
- `Ty::is_unpin`
- `Ty::is_copy_modulo_regions`
This allows to remove a lot of useless `.at(DUMMY_SP)`, making the code a bit nicer :3
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rename some `OwnerId` fields.
`@spastorino` noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of `def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left that alone.
r? `@compiler-errors`
filter candidates in pick probe for diagnostics
Fixes#103411, though also fine with closing this PR if my opinion (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103411#issuecomment-1287900069) is shared that this doesn't need to be fixed.
```
~/rust3$ time rustc +nightly ~/test.rs 2>/dev/null
real 0m4.853s
user 0m4.837s
sys 0m0.016s
~/rust3$ time rustc +rust3 ~/test.rs 2>/dev/null
real 0m0.193s
user 0m0.169s
sys 0m0.024s
```
Also fixes#103427.
Prevent foreign Rust exceptions from being caught
Fix#102715
Use the address of a static variable (which is guaranteed to be unique per copy of std) to tell apart if a Rust exception comes from local or foreign Rust code, and abort for the latter.
compiletest: Refactor test rustcflags
Refactoring `host-rustcflags` and `target-rustcflags` from `Option<String>` to `Vec<String>`
Ref: #102438
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
spastorino noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so
those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of
`def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left
that alone.
Note scope of TAIT more accurately
This maybe explains why the person was confused in #101897, since we say "same module" but really should've said "same impl".
r? ``@oli-obk``
Introduce UnordMap, UnordSet, and UnordBag (MCP 533)
This is the start of implementing [MCP 533](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/533).
I followed `@eddyb's` suggestion of naming the collection types `Unord(Map/Set/Bag)` which is a bit easier to type than `Unordered(Map/Set/Bag)`
r? `@eddyb`
privacy: Rename "accessibility levels" to "effective visibilities"
And a couple of other naming and comment tweaks.
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054
For `enum Level` I initially used naming `enum EffectiveVisibilityLevel`, but it was too long and inconvenient because it's used pretty often.
So I shortened it to just `Level`, if it needs to be used from some context where this name would be ambiguous, then it can be imported with renaming like `use rustc_middle::privacy::Level as EffVisLevel` or something.
poll_fn and Unpin: fix pinning
See [IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/surprising-soundness-trouble-around-pollfn/17484) for details: currently `poll_fn` is very subtle to use, since it does not pin the closure, so creating a `Pin::get_unchcked(&mut capture)` inside the closure is unsound. This leads to actual miscompilations with `futures::join!`.
IMO the proper fix is to pin the closure when the future is pinned, which is achieved by changing the `Unpin` implementation. This is a breaking change though. 1.64.0 was *just* released, so maybe this is still okay?
The alternative would be to add some strong comments to the docs saying that closure captures are *not pinned* and doing `Pin::get_unchecked` on them is unsound.
Fix line numbers for MIR inlined code
`should_collapse_debuginfo` detects if the specified span is part of a
macro expansion however it does this by checking if the span is anything
other than a normal (non-expanded) kind, then the span sequence is
walked backwards to the root span.
This doesn't work when the MIR inliner inlines code as it creates spans
with expansion information set to `ExprKind::Inlined` and results in the
line number being attributed to the inline callsite rather than the
normal line number of the inlined code.
Fixes#103068
Update cargo
6 commits in 9210810d1fd7b51ae0439a0a363cc50e36963455..7e484fc1a766f56dbc95380f45719698e0c82749 2022-10-25 22:31:50 +0000 to 2022-10-27 15:20:57 +0000
- fix(publish): Block until it is in index (rust-lang/cargo#11062)
- Add Accept-Encoding request header to enable compression (rust-lang/cargo#11292)
- Update contrib docs for highfive transition (rust-lang/cargo#11294)
- Migrate from highfive to triagebot (rust-lang/cargo#11293)
- Fix dupe word typos (rust-lang/cargo#11287)
- Fix confusing error messages when using -Zsparse-registry (rust-lang/cargo#11283)
rustdoc: stop hiding focus outlines on non-rustdoc-toggle details tags
We really shouldn't be overriding this kind of stuff unless the browser default is really broken (like outlining the thing that isn't clickable). This directly reverts b8f4e74cbc.
Emit a nicer error on `impl Self {`
currently it emits a "cycle detected error" but this PR makes it emit a more user friendly error specifically saying that `Self` is disallowed in that position. this is a pretty hacky fix so i dont expect this to be merged (I basically only made this PR because i wanted to see if CI passes)
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Remap early bound lifetimes in return-position `impl Trait` in traits too
Fixes part of #103457
r? ``@cjgillot,`` though feel free to reassign, just thought you'd have sufficient context to review.
Don't carry MIR location in `ConstraintCategory::CallArgument`
It turns out that `ConstraintCategory::CallArgument` cannot just carry a MIR location in it, since we may bubble them up to totally different MIR bodies.
So instead, revert the commit a6b5f95fb0, and instead just erase regions from the original `Option<Ty<'tcx>>` that it carried, so that it doesn't ICE with the changes in #103220.
Best reviewed in parts -- the first is just a revert, and the second is where the meaningful changes happen.
Fixes#103624
diagnostics: do not suggest static candidates as traits to import
If it's a static candidate, then it's already implemented. Do not suggest it a second time for implementing.
Partial fix for #102354
Fix unwanted merge of inline doc comments for impl blocks
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102909.
We need this merge mechanism for inlined items but it's completely unwanted for impl blocks (at least the doc comments are, not the other attributes) since we want to keep what `cfg()` is put on the `pub use` or other attributes.
r? ``@notriddle``
Add suggestions for unsafe impl error codes
Adds suggestions for users to add `unsafe` to trait impls that should be `unsafe`, and remove `unsafe` from trait impls that do not require `unsafe`
With the folllowing code:
```rust
struct Foo {}
struct Bar {}
trait Safe {}
unsafe trait Unsafe {}
impl Safe for Foo {} // ok
impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
unsafe impl Unsafe for Bar {} // ok
// omitted empty main fn
```
The current rustc output is:
```
error[E0199]: implementing the trait `Safe` is not unsafe
--> e0200.rs:13:1
|
13 | unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0200]: the trait `Unsafe` requires an `unsafe impl` declaration
--> e0200.rs:11:1
|
11 | impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0199, E0200.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0199`.
```
With this PR, the future rustc output would be:
```
error[E0199]: implementing the trait `Safe` is not unsafe
--> ../../temp/e0200.rs:13:1
|
13 | unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: remove `unsafe` from this trait implementation
|
13 - unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
13 + impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
|
error[E0200]: the trait `Unsafe` requires an `unsafe impl` declaration
--> ../../temp/e0200.rs:11:1
|
11 | impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the trait `Unsafe` enforces invariants that the compiler can't check. Review the trait documentation and make sure this implementation upholds those invariants before adding the `unsafe` keyword
help: add `unsafe` to this trait implementation
|
11 | unsafe impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ++++++
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0199, E0200.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0199`.
```
``@rustbot`` label +T-compiler +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics
Add tests for static async functions in traits
This patch adds test cases for AFIT, the majority of which are currently expected to run as `check-fail`.
---
Note: I grabbed the cases from https://hackmd.io/SwRcXCiWQV-WRJ4BYs53fA
Also, I'm not sure if the `async-associated-types2` and `async-associated-types2-desugared` are correct, I modified them a bit from the examples in the HackMD.
