8942: Add `library` semantic token modifier to items from other crates r=arzg a=arzg
Closes#5772.
A lot of code here is pretty repetitive; please let me know if you have any ideas how to improve it, or whether it’s fine as-is.
Side-note: How can I add tests for this? I don’t see a way for the test Rust code in `test_highlighting` to reference other crates to observe the new behaviour.
Co-authored-by: Aramis Razzaghipour <aramisnoah@gmail.com>
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
The case-insensitive prefix/suffix check can be performed
character-by-character. This allows the check to be done without having
to allocate a new string. As a side effect, it's also no longer
necessary to convert the entire string to lowercase, as it's done as
needed. As the only case equality we're handling is ASCII, this
operation can be further optimized by using byte equality, rather than
character equality.
Rather than eagerly converting JSON, we losslessly keep it as is, and
change the shape of user-submitted data at the last moment.
This also allows us to remove a bunch of wrong Defaults
6393: Remove repetitive inlay hints (take 2) r=matklad a=lnicola
6399: Keep generic annotations when qualifying things r=matklad a=Veykril
The `qualify_path` assists currently eats up already annotated generics in all but one cases which can be annoying if one already pre-fills generics of a type before it's been qualified.
Co-authored-by: Matthew Sanetra <matthewsanetra@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Declaration names sounds like a name of declaration -- something you
can use for analysis. It empathically isn't, and is just a label
displayed in various UI. It's important not to confuse the two, least
we accidentally mix semantics with UI (I believe, there's already a
case of this in the FamousDefs at least).
