This library is now published on crates.io as the `term` crate, so the in-tree
version is now deprecated. Once stability warnings are enabled, this library
will automatically be gated.
According to http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#data-layout correct syntax
for data layout is `a:<abi>:<pref>` so it looks like `a0:<abi>:<pref>` is
either a typo or outdated syntax (as it goes back pretty deep in time)
The methods `from_bits` and `from_bits_truncate` were missing from the
list of generated methods. Didn't see a useful way to abbreviate, so
added with the same docstrings used in the macro definition.
Since runtime is removed, rust has no tasks anymore and everything is moving
from being task-* to thread-*. Let’s rename TaskRng as well!
This is a breaking change. If a breaking change for consistency is not desired, feel free to close.
Fixes#19707.
In terms of output, it currently uses the form `argument #1`, `argument #2`, etc. If anyone has any better suggestions I would be glad to consider them.
* Both enums already derived `Copy`, but storing them in any
struct/container would prevent implementing `Clone` for said
struct/container even though they should be clonable.
* Also add PartialEq and Eq for good measure.
I would like to look into some issues related to the model lexer #15883.
I stumbled upon 2 minor problems when I tried running the lexer tests:
* antlr did not put the generated files in the correct directory
* grammer/verify.rs did not work with the most recent version of rust
With these changes (and setting CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/antlr-4.4-complete.jar:$CLASSPATH) I was able to execute the tests.
Note that I just fixed the syntax errors and added `None` as 2. argument of `Literal`. I am not sure if this is correct however. I still have to take a closer look at what verify.rs actually does. Are there any helpful pointers?
I've created a patch for #20226, which maps `EEXIST` to the `PathAlreadyExists` error on Unix. To test this, I use `mkdir`, which raises `EEXIST` if the directory already exists.
On Windows, I map `ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS` to `PathAlreadyExist`, but I am note sure if `mkdir` on Windows raises `ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS` and do not have a Windows installation handy for testing.
And I noticed another thing. No error seems to map to `IoErrorKind::PathDoesntExist` and I am wondering what the difference to `FileNotFound` is?
The example derived Hash + Eq on a type that was used as *values* for
a hashmap.. for the example to make sense, we have to use a custom *key*
type.
Write a slightly more involved example, still using Vikings, but this
time as key.
I preferred using String over &str here, since that's the typical usage
and we might want to lead users down that path.
Yes, really. That definition wouldn't work anyway.
This also fixes repeated entries for `debug_assert!` from libcore docs. Maybe we should warn such macro definitions in the first place?
The first six commits are from an earlier PR (#19858) and have already been reviewed. This PR makes an awful hack in the compiler to accommodate slices both natively and in the index a range form. After a snapshot we can hopefully add the new Index impls and then we can remove these awful hacks.
r? @nikomatsakis (or anyone who knows the compiler, really)
This commit performs a second pass for stabilization over the `std::ptr` module.
The specific actions taken were:
* The `RawPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrExt`
* The `RawMutPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrMutExt`
* The module name `ptr` is now stable.
* These functions were all marked `#[stable]` with no modification:
* `null`
* `null_mut`
* `swap`
* `replace`
* `read`
* `write`
* `PtrExt::is_null`
* `PtrExt::is_not_null`
* `PtrExt::offset`
* These functions remain unstable:
* `as_ref`, `as_mut` - the return value of an `Option` is not fully expressive
as null isn't the only bad value, and it's unclear
whether we want to commit to these functions at this
time. The reference/lifetime semantics as written are
also problematic in how they encourage arbitrary
lifetimes.
* `zero_memory` - This function is currently not used at all in the
distribution, and in general it plays a broader role in the
"working with unsafe pointers" story. This story is not yet
fully developed, so at this time the function remains
unstable for now.
* `read_and_zero` - This function remains unstable for largely the same
reasons as `zero_memory`.
* These functions are now all deprecated:
* `PtrExt::null` - call `ptr::null` or `ptr::null_mut` instead.
* `PtrExt::to_uint` - use an `as` expression instead.
All of the current std::sync primitives have poisoning enable which means that
when a task fails inside of a write-access lock then all future attempts to
acquire the lock will fail. This strategy ensures that stale data whose
invariants are possibly not upheld are never viewed by other tasks to help
propagate unexpected panics (bugs in a program) among tasks.
Currently there is no way to test whether a mutex or rwlock is poisoned. One
method would be to duplicate all the methods with a sister foo_catch function,
for example. This pattern is, however, against our [error guidelines][errors].
As a result, this commit exposes the fact that a task has failed internally
through the return value of a `Result`.
[errors]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0236-error-conventions.md#do-not-provide-both-result-and-fail-variants
All methods now return a `LockResult<T>` or a `TryLockResult<T>` which
communicates whether the lock was poisoned or not. In a `LockResult`, both the
`Ok` and `Err` variants contains the `MutexGuard<T>` that is being returned in
order to allow access to the data if poisoning is not desired. This also means
that the lock is *always* held upon returning from `.lock()`.
A new type, `PoisonError`, was added with one method `into_guard` which can
consume the assertion that a lock is poisoned to gain access to the underlying
data.
This is a breaking change because the signatures of these methods have changed,
often incompatible ways. One major difference is that the `wait` methods on a
condition variable now consume the guard and return it in as a `LockResult` to
indicate whether the lock was poisoned while waiting. Most code can be updated
by calling `.unwrap()` on the return value of `.lock()`.
[breaking-change]
[breaking-change]
The `mut` in slices is now redundant. Mutability is 'inferred' from position. This means that if mutability is only obvious from the type, you will need to use explicit calls to the slicing methods.
This commit performs a second pass for stabilization over the `std::ptr` module.
The specific actions taken were:
* The `RawPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrExt`
* The `RawMutPtr` trait was renamed to `MutPtrExt`
* The module name `ptr` is now stable.
* These functions were all marked `#[stable]` with no modification:
* `null`
* `null_mut`
* `swap`
* `replace`
* `read`
* `write`
* `PtrExt::is_null`
* `PtrExt::offset`
* These functions remain unstable:
* `as_ref`, `as_mut` - the return value of an `Option` is not fully expressive
as null isn't the only bad value, and it's unclear
whether we want to commit to these functions at this
time. The reference/lifetime semantics as written are
also problematic in how they encourage arbitrary
lifetimes.
* `zero_memory` - This function is currently not used at all in the
distribution, and in general it plays a broader role in the
"working with unsafe pointers" story. This story is not yet
fully developed, so at this time the function remains
unstable for now.
* `read_and_zero` - This function remains unstable for largely the same
reasons as `zero_memory`.
* These functions are now all deprecated:
* `PtrExt::null` - call `ptr::null` or `ptr::null_mut` instead.
* `PtrExt::to_uint` - use an `as` expression instead.
* `PtrExt::is_not_null` - use `!p.is_null()` instead.
These crates are all deprecated for their rust-lang/$crate equivalents and by
generating docs we're generating broken links. The documentation for these
crates are generated out-of-tree and are managed separately, so we're not losing
the documentation altogether, just the links from the main distribution's docs.
Closes#20096
This stabilizes most methods on `&str` working with patterns in a way that is forwards-compatible with a generic string pattern matching API:
- Methods that are using the primary name for their operation are marked as `#[stable]`, as they can be upgraded to a full `Pattern` API later without existing code breaking. Example: `contains(&str)`
- Methods that are using a more specific name in order to not clash with the primary one are marked as `#[unstable]`, as they will likely be removed once their functionality is merged into the primary one. Example: `contains_char<C: CharEq>(C)`
- The method docs got changed to consistently refer to the pattern types as a pattern.
- Methods whose names do not match in the context of the more generic API got renamed. Example: `trim_chars -> trim_matches`
Additionally, all methods returning iterators got changed to return unique new types with changed names in accordance with the new naming guidelines.
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/528
Due to some deprecations and type changes, this is a
[breaking-change]
All of the current std::sync primitives have poisoning enable which means that
when a task fails inside of a write-access lock then all future attempts to
acquire the lock will fail. This strategy ensures that stale data whose
invariants are possibly not upheld are never viewed by other tasks to help
propagate unexpected panics (bugs in a program) among tasks.
Currently there is no way to test whether a mutex or rwlock is poisoned. One
method would be to duplicate all the methods with a sister foo_catch function,
for example. This pattern is, however, against our [error guidelines][errors].
As a result, this commit exposes the fact that a task has failed internally
through the return value of a `Result`.
[errors]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0236-error-conventions.md#do-not-provide-both-result-and-fail-variants
All methods now return a `LockResult<T>` or a `TryLockResult<T>` which
communicates whether the lock was poisoned or not. In a `LockResult`, both the
`Ok` and `Err` variants contains the `MutexGuard<T>` that is being returned in
order to allow access to the data if poisoning is not desired. This also means
that the lock is *always* held upon returning from `.lock()`.
A new type, `PoisonError`, was added with one method `into_guard` which can
consume the assertion that a lock is poisoned to gain access to the underlying
data.
This is a breaking change because the signatures of these methods have changed,
often incompatible ways. One major difference is that the `wait` methods on a
condition variable now consume the guard and return it in as a `LockResult` to
indicate whether the lock was poisoned while waiting. Most code can be updated
by calling `.unwrap()` on the return value of `.lock()`.
[breaking-change]
This takes building `librustc/lib.rs` from using 696 MB to 588 (`rustc --no-trans`), and 1.99 GB to 1.87 (`rustc -O`). It also reduces `sty` down to 32 bytes on platforms with 64-bit pointers, at the expense of some more side-tables in `ctxt`. I'm sure there's more gains to be had from reducing the size of the side tables (e.g. by making the actual things they're storing smaller).
r? @nikomatsakis
