Coercion casts (`expr as T` where the type of `expr` can be coerced to
`T`) are essentially no-ops, as the actual work is done by a coercion.
Previously a check for type equality was used to avoid emitting the
redundant cast in the MIR, but this failed for coercion casts of
function items that had lifetime parameters. The MIR trans code doesn't
handle `FnPtr -> FnPtr` casts and produced an error.
Also fixes a bug with type ascription expressions not having any
adjustments applied.
Fixes#33295
Primarily affects the MIR construction, which indirectly improves LLVM
IR generation, but some LLVM IR changes have been made too.
* Handle "statement expressions" more intelligently. These are
expressions that always evaluate to `()`. Previously a temporary would
be generated as a destination to translate into, which is unnecessary.
This affects assignment, augmented assignment, `return`, `break` and
`continue`.
* Avoid inserting drops for non-drop types in more places. Scheduled
drops were already skipped for types that we knew wouldn't need
dropping at construction time. However manually-inserted drops like
those for `x` in `x = y;` were still generated. `build_drop` now takes
a type parameter like its `schedule_drop` counterpart and checks to
see if the type needs dropping.
* Avoid generating an extra temporary for an assignment where the types
involved don't need dropping. Previously an expression like
`a = b + 1;` would result in a temporary for `b + 1`. This is so the
RHS can be evaluated, then the LHS evaluated and dropped and have
everything work correctly. However, this isn't necessary if the `LHS`
doesn't need a drop, as we can just overwrite the existing value.
* Improves lvalue analysis to allow treating an `Rvalue::Use` as an
operand in certain conditions. The reason for it never being an
operand is so it can be zeroed/drop-filled, but this is only true for
types that need dropping.
The first two changes result in significantly fewer MIR blocks being
generated, as previously almost every statement would end up generating
a new block due to the drop of the `()` temporary being generated.
Paths are mostly parsed without taking whitespaces into account, e.g. `std :: vec :: Vec :: new ()` parses successfully, however, there are some special cases involving keywords `super`, `self` and `Self`. For example, `self::` is considered a path start only if there are no spaces between `self` and `::`. These restrictions probably made sense when `self` and friends weren't keywords, but now they are unnecessary.
The first two commits remove this special treatment of whitespaces by removing `token::IdentStyle` entirely and therefore fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/14109.
This change also affects naked `self` and `super` (which are not tightly followed by `::`, obviously) they can now be parsed as paths, however they are still not resolved correctly in imports (cc @jseyfried, see `compile-fail/use-keyword.rs`), so https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29036 is not completely fixed.
The third commit also makes `super`, `self`, `Self` and `static` keywords nominally (before this they acted as keywords for all purposes) and removes most of remaining \"special idents\".
The last commit (before tests) contains some small improvements - some qualified paths with type parameters are parsed correctly, `parse_path` is not used for parsing single identifiers, imports are sanity checked for absence of type parameters - such type parameters can be generated by syntax extensions or by macros when https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/10415 is fixed (~~soon!~~already!).
This patch changes some pretty basic things in `libsyntax`, like `token::Token` and the keyword list, so it's a plugin-[breaking-change].
r? @eddyb
MIR: Do not require END_BLOCK to always exist
Basically, all this does, is removing restriction for END_BLOCK to exist past the first invocation of RemoveDeadBlocks pass. This way for functions whose CFG does not reach the `END_BLOCK` end up not containing the block.
As far as the implementation goes, I’m not entirely satisfied with the `BasicBlock::end_block`. I had hoped to make `new` a `const fn` and then just have a `const END_BLOCK` private to mir::build, but it turns out that constant functions don’t yet support conditionals nor a way to assert.
Once upon a time, along with START_BLOCK and END_BLOCK in the castle of important blocks also lived
a RESUME_BLOCK (or was it UNWIND_BLOCK? Either works, I don’t remember anymore). This trinity of
important blocks were required to always exist from the birth to death of the MIR-land they
belonged to.
Some time later, it was discovered that RESUME_BLOCK was just a lazy goon enjoying comfortable life
in the light of fame of the other two. Needless to say, once found out, the RESUME_BLOCK was
quickly slain and disposed of.
Now, the all-seeing eye of ours discovers that END_BLOCK is actually the more evil and better
disguised twin of the slain RESUME_BLOCK. Thus END_BLOCK gets slain and quickly disposed
of. Glory to the START_BLOCK, one and only lord of the important blocks’ castle!
---
Basically, all this does, is removing restriction for END_BLOCK to exist past the first invocation
of RemoveDeadBlocks pass. This way for functions whose CFG does not reach the `END_BLOCK` end up
not containing the block.
As far as the implementation goes, I’m not entirely satisfied with the `BasicBlock::end_block`, I
had hoped to make `new` a `const fn` and then just have a `const END_BLOCK` private to mir::build,
but it turns out that constant functions don’t yet support conditionals nor a way to assert.
Plumb obligations through librustc/infer
Like #32542, but more like #31867.
TODO before merge: make an issue for the propagation of obligations through... uh, everywhere... then replace the `#????`s with the actual issue number.
cc @jroesch
r? @nikomatsakis
rBreak Critical Edges and other MIR work
This PR is built on top of #32080.
This adds the basic depth-first traversals for MIR, preorder, postorder and reverse postorder. The MIR blocks are now translated using reverse postorder. There is also a transform for breaking critical edges, which includes the edges from `invoke`d calls (`Drop` and `Call`), to account for the fact that we can't add code after an `invoke`. It also stops generating the intermediate block (since the transform essentially does it if necessary already).
The kinds of cases this deals with are difficult to produce, so the test is the one I managed to get. However, it seems to bootstrap with `-Z orbit`, which it didn't before my changes.
Also adds a new set of passes to run just before translation that
"prepare" the MIR for codegen. Removal of landing pads, region erasure
and break critical edges are run in this pass.
Also fixes some merge/rebase errors.
This is a fairly standard transform that inserts blocks along critical
edges so code can be inserted along the edge without it affecting other
edges. The main difference is that it considers a Drop or Call
terminator that would require an `invoke` instruction in LLVM a critical
edge. This is because we can't actually insert code after an invoke, so
it ends up looking similar to a critical edge anyway.
The transform is run just before translation right now.
Restrict constants in patterns
This implements [RFC 1445](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1445-restrict-constants-in-patterns.md). The primary change is to limit the types of constants used in patterns to those that *derive* `Eq` (note that implementing `Eq` is not sufficient). This has two main effects:
1. Floating point constants are linted, and will eventually be disallowed. This is because floating point constants do not implement `Eq` but only `PartialEq`. This check replaces the existing special case code that aimed to detect the use of `NaN`.
2. Structs and enums must derive `Eq` to be usable within a match.
This is a [breaking-change]: if you encounter a problem, you are most likely using a constant in an expression where the type of the constant is some struct that does not currently implement
`Eq`. Something like the following:
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
The easiest and most future compatible fix is to annotate the type in question with `#[derive(Eq)]` (note that merely *implementing* `Eq` is not enough, it must be *derived*):
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Another good option is to rewrite the match arm to use an `if` condition (this is also particularly good for floating point types, which implement `PartialEq` but not `Eq`):
```rust
match foo {
c if c == SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Finally, a third alternative is to tag the type with `#[structural_match]`; but this is not recommended, as the attribute is never expected to be stabilized. Please see RFC #1445 for more details.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31434
r? @pnkfelix
This is a [breaking-change]: according to RFC #1445, constants used as
patterns must be of a type that *derives* `Eq`. If you encounter a
problem, you are most likely using a constant in an expression where the
type of the constant is some struct that does not currently implement
`Eq`. Something like the following:
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
The easiest and most future compatible fix is to annotate the type in
question with `#[derive(Eq)]` (note that merely *implementing* `Eq` is
not enough, it must be *derived*):
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Another good option is to rewrite the match arm to use an `if`
condition (this is also particularly good for floating point types,
which implement `PartialEq` but not `Eq`):
```rust
match foo {
c if c == SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Finally, a third alternative is to tag the type with
`#[structural_match]`; but this is not recommended, as the attribute is
never expected to be stabilized. Please see RFC #1445 for more details.
while I'm at it, remove the "extra caching" that I was doing for no good
reason except laziness. Basically before I was caching at each scope in
the chain, but there's not really a reason to do that, since the cached
entry point at level N is always equal to the last cached exit point
from level N-1.
It's nice to be able to index with a scope-id,
but coherence rules prevent us from implementing
`Index<ScopeId>` for `Vec<ScopeAuxiliary>`, and I'd
prefer that `ScopeAuxiliary` remain in librustc_mir,
just for compilation time reasons.
This was triggered by me wanting to address a use of DUMMY_SP, but
actually I'm not sure what would be a better span -- I guess the span
for the function as a whole.
Automated conversion using the untry tool [1] and the following command:
```
$ find -name '*.rs' -type f | xargs untry
```
at the root of the Rust repo.
[1]: https://github.com/japaric/untry
emit (via debug!) scary message from `fn borrowck_mir` until basic
prototype is in place.
Gather children of move paths and set their kill bits in
dataflow. (Each node has a link to the child that is first among its
siblings.)
Hooked in libgraphviz based rendering, including of borrowck dataflow
state.
doing this well required some refactoring of the code, so I cleaned it
up more generally (adding comments to explain what its trying to do
and how it is doing it).
Update: this newer version addresses most review comments (at least
the ones that were largely mechanical changes), but I left the more
interesting revisions to separate followup commits (in this same PR).
typestrong const integers
~~It would be great if someone could run crater on this PR, as this has a high danger of breaking valid code~~ Crater ran. Good to go.
----
So this PR does a few things:
1. ~~const eval array values when const evaluating an array expression~~
2. ~~const eval repeat value when const evaluating a repeat expression~~
3. ~~const eval all struct and tuple fields when evaluating a struct/tuple expression~~
4. remove the `ConstVal::Int` and `ConstVal::Uint` variants and replace them with a single enum (`ConstInt`) which has variants for all integral types
* `usize`/`isize` are also enums with variants for 32 and 64 bit. At creation and various usage steps there are assertions in place checking if the target bitwidth matches with the chosen enum variant
5. enum discriminants (`ty::Disr`) are now `ConstInt`
6. trans has its own `Disr` type now (newtype around `u64`)
This obviously can't be done without breaking changes (the ones that are noticable in stable)
We could probably write lints that find those situations and error on it for a cycle or two. But then again, those situations are rare and really bugs imo anyway:
```rust
let v10 = 10 as i8;
let v4 = 4 as isize;
assert_eq!(v10 << v4 as usize, 160 as i8);
```
stops compiling because 160 is not a valid i8
```rust
struct S<T, S> {
a: T,
b: u8,
c: S
}
let s = S { a: 0xff_ff_ff_ffu32, b: 1, c: 0xaa_aa_aa_aa as i32 };
```
stops compiling because `0xaa_aa_aa_aa` is not a valid i32
----
cc @eddyb @pnkfelix
related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1071
Add Pass manager for MIR
A new PR, since rebasing the original one (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/31448) properly was a pain. Since then there has been several changes most notable of which:
1. Removed the pretty-printing with `#[rustc_mir(graphviz/pretty)]`, mostly because we now have `--unpretty=mir`, IMHO that’s the direction we should expand this functionality into;
2. Reverted the infercx change done for typeck, because typeck can make an infercx for itself by being a `MirMapPass`
r? @nikomatsakis
There's a lot of stuff wrong with the representation of these types:
TyFnDef doesn't actually uniquely identify a function, TyFnPtr is used to
represent method calls, TyFnDef in the sub-expression of a cast isn't
correctly reified, and probably some other stuff I haven't discovered yet.
Splitting them seems like the right first step, though.
This PR implements [RFC 1192](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md), which is triple-dot syntax for inclusive range expressions. The new stuff is behind two feature gates (one for the syntax and one for the std::ops types). This replaces the deprecated functionality in std::iter. Along the way I simplified the desugaring for all ranges.
This is my first contribution to rust which changes more than one character outside of a test or comment, so please review carefully! Some of the individual commit messages have more of my notes. Also thanks for putting up with my dumb questions in #rust-internals.
- For implementing `std::ops::RangeInclusive`, I took @Stebalien's suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1192#issuecomment-137864421. It seemed to me to make the implementation easier and increase type safety. If that stands, the RFC should be amended to avoid confusion.
- I also kind of like @glaebhoerl's [idea](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1254#issuecomment-147815299), which is unified inclusive/exclusive range syntax something like `x>..=y`. We can experiment with this while everything is behind a feature gate.
- There are a couple of FIXMEs left (see the last commit). I didn't know what to do about `RangeArgument` and I haven't added `Index` impls yet. Those should be discussed/finished before merging.
cc @Gankro since you [complained](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3xkfro/what_happened_to_inclusive_ranges/cy5j0yq)
cc #27777#30877rust-lang/rust#1192rust-lang/rfcs#1254
relevant to #28237 (tracking issue)
Zeroing on-drop seems to work fine. Still thinking about the best way to approach zeroing on-move.
(based on top of the other drop PR; only the last 2 commits are relevant)
A whole bunch of stuff gets folded into struct handling! Plus, removes
an ugly hack from trans and accidentally fixes a bug with constructing
ranges from references (see later commits with tests).
In MIR we previously tried to match `let x in { exprs; let y in { exprs; }}` with our data
structures which is rather unwieldy, espeicially because it requires some sort of recursion or
stack to process, while, a flat list of statements is enough – lets only relinquish their lifetime
at the end of the block (i.e. end of the list).
Also fixes#31853.
This changes three ICEs to fatal errors.
I've grepped for `lang_item.*expect` and `\.expect.*lang` and didn't come up with any more. But, there could be more ICEs lurking.
I wasn't sure about a test because there already _is_ a cfail test for missing lang items, but it only checks one.
Relevant to (already closed) #31477#31480#31558.
cc @lilred
The pass removes the unwind branch of each terminator, thus moving the responsibility of handling
the -Z no-landing-pads flag to a small self-contained pass… instead of polluting the translator.
Having a `MirPass` provides literally no benefits over `MutVisitor`. Moreover using `MirPass` for
`EraseRegions` basically makes the programmer to fix breakage from changing repr twice – in the
visitor and eraseregions. Since `MutVisitor` implements all the “walking” inside the trait, that can
be reused for `EraseRegions` too, basically resulting in less code duplication.
The structure of the old translator as well as MIR assumed that drop glue cannot possibly panic and
translated the drops accordingly. However, in presence of `Drop::drop` this assumption can be
trivially shown to be untrue. As such, the Rust code like the following would never print number 2:
```rust
struct Droppable(u32);
impl Drop for Droppable {
fn drop(&mut self) {
if self.0 == 1 { panic!("Droppable(1)") } else { println!("{}", self.0) }
}
}
fn main() {
let x = Droppable(2);
let y = Droppable(1);
}
```
While the behaviour is allowed according to the language rules (we allow drops to not run), that’s
a very counter-intuitive behaviour. We fix this in MIR by allowing `Drop` to have a target to take
on divergence and connect the drops in such a way so the leftover drops are executed when some drop
unwinds.
Note, that this commit still does not implement the translator part of changes necessary for the
grand scheme of things to fully work, so the actual observed behaviour does not change yet. Coming
soon™.
See #14875.
We used to have CallKind only because there was a requirement to have all successors in a
contiguous memory block. Now that the requirement is gone, remove the CallKind and instead just
have the necessary information inline.
Awesome!
This commit removes the `-D warnings` flag being passed through the makefiles to
all crates to instead be a crate attribute. We want these attributes always
applied for all our standard builds, and this is more amenable to Cargo-based
builds as well.
Note that all `deny(warnings)` attributes are gated with a `cfg(stage0)`
attribute currently to match the same semantics we have today
All structs and their constructors are defined as `DefStruct`.
`DefTy` is splitted into `DefEnum` and `DefTyAlias`.
Ad hoc flag `bool is_structure` is removed from `DefVariant`, it was required in one place in resolve and could be obtained by other means.
Flag `bool is_ctor` is removed from `DefFn`, it wasn't really used for constructors outside of metadata decoding.
Observable effects:
More specific error messages are selected in some cases.
Two name resolution bugs fixed (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30992 and FIXME in compile-fail/empty-struct-braces-expr.rs).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30992
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30361
As an attempt to make loop body destination be optional, author implemented a pretty self contained
change and deemed it to be (much) uglier than the alternative of just keeping the unit temporary.
Having the temporary created lazily also has a nice property of not figuring in the MIR of
functions which do not use loops of any sort.
r? @nikomatsakis
An attempt to make loop body destination be optional, author implemented a pretty self contained
change and deemed it to be (much) uglier than the alternative of just keeping the unit temporary.
Having the temporary created lazily also has a nice property of not figuring in the MIR of
functions which do not use loops of any sort.
This PR introduces an `ObligationForest` data structure that the fulfillment context can use to track what's going on, instead of the current flat vector. This enables a number of improvements:
1. transactional support, at least for pushing new obligations
2. remove the "errors will be reported" hack -- instead, we only add types to the global cache once their entire subtree has been proven safe. Before, we never knew when this point was reached because we didn't track the subtree.
- this in turn allows us to limit coinductive reasoning to structural traits, which sidesteps #29859
3. keeping the backtrace should allow for an improved error message, where we give the user full context
- we can also remove chained obligation causes
This PR is not 100% complete. In particular:
- [x] Currently, types that embed themselves like `struct Foo { f: Foo }` give an overflow when evaluating whether `Foo: Sized`. This is not a very user-friendly error message, and this is a common beginner error. I plan to special-case this scenario, I think.
- [x] I should do some perf. measurements. (Update: 2% regression.)
- [x] More tests targeting #29859
- [ ] The transactional support is not fully integrated, though that should be easy enough.
- [ ] The error messages are not taking advantage of the backtrace.
I'd certainly like to do 1 through 3 before landing, but 4 and 5 could come as separate PRs.
r? @aturon // good way to learn more about this part of the trait system
f? @arielb1 // already knows this part of the trait system :)
This provides limited support for using associated consts on type parameters. It generally works on things that can be figured out at trans time. This doesn't work for array lengths or match arms. I have another patch to make it work in const expressions.
CC @eddyb @nikomatsakis
Previously we would generate regular calls for these, which is likely to result in worse LLVM code,
especially in presence of cleanups – we needn’t unecessarilly generate landing pads to construct an
ADT!
Get rid of that nasty unit_ty temporary variable created just because it might be handy to have one around, when in reality it isn’t really that useful at all.
r? @nikomatsakis
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30637
Previously it was returning a clone, mostly for the two reasons:
* Cloning Lvalue is very cheap most of the time (i.e. when Lvalue is not a Projection);
* There’s users who want &mut lvalue and there’s users who want &lvalue. Returning a value allows
to make either one easier when pattern matching (i.e. Some(ref dest) or Some(ref mut dest)).
However, I’m now convinced this is an invalid approach. Namely the users which want a mutable
reference may modify the Lvalue in-place, but the changes won’t be reflected in the final MIR,
since the Lvalue modified is merely a clone.
Instead, we have two accessors `destination` and `destination_mut` which return a reference to the
destination in desired mode.
r? @nikomatsakis
Previously it was returning a value, mostly for the two reasons:
* Cloning Lvalue is very cheap most of the time (i.e. when Lvalue is not a Projection);
* There’s users who want &mut lvalue and there’s users who want &lvalue. Returning a value allows
to make either one easier when pattern matching (i.e. Some(ref dest) or Some(ref mut dest)).
However, I’m now convinced this is an invalid approach. Namely the users which want a mutable
reference may modify the Lvalue in-place, but the changes won’t be reflected in the final MIR,
since the Lvalue modified is merely a clone.
Instead, we have two accessors `destination` and `destination_mut` which return a reference to the
destination in desired mode.
Assign a default unit value to the destinations of block expressions without trailing expression,
return expressions without return value (i.e. `return;`) and conditionals without else clause.
This is roughly the same as my previous PR that created a dependency graph, but that:
1. The dependency graph is only optionally constructed, though this doesn't seem to make much of a difference in terms of overhead (see measurements below).
2. The dependency graph is simpler (I combined a lot of nodes).
3. The dependency graph debugging facilities are much better: you can now use `RUST_DEP_GRAPH_FILTER` to filter the dep graph to just the nodes you are interested in, which is super help.
4. The tests are somewhat more elaborate, including a few known bugs I need to fix in a second pass.
This is potentially a `[breaking-change]` for plugin authors. If you are poking about in tcx state or something like that, you probably want to add `let _ignore = tcx.dep_graph.in_ignore();`, which will cause your reads/writes to be ignored and not affect the dep-graph.
After this, or perhaps as an add-on to this PR in some cases, what I would like to do is the following:
- [x] Write-up a little guide to how to use this system, the debugging options available, and what the possible failure modes are.
- [ ] Introduce read-only and perhaps the `Meta` node
- [x] Replace "memoization tasks" with node from the map itself
- [ ] Fix the shortcomings, obviously! Notably, the HIR map needs to register reads, and there is some state that is not yet tracked. (Maybe as a separate PR.)
- [x] Refactor the dep-graph code so that the actual maintenance of the dep-graph occurs in a parallel thread, and the main thread simply throws things into a shared channel (probably a fixed-size channel). There is no reason for dep-graph construction to be on the main thread. (Maybe as a separate PR.)
Regarding performance: adding this tracking does add some overhead, approximately 2% in my measurements (I was comparing the build times for rustdoc). Interestingly, enabling or disabling tracking doesn't seem to do very much. I want to poke at this some more and gather a bit more data -- in some tests I've seen that 2% go away, but on others it comes back. It's not entirely clear to me if that 2% is truly due to constructing the dep-graph at all.
The next big step after this is write some code to dump the dep-graph to disk and reload it.
r? @michaelwoerister
This merges two separate Call terminators and uses a separate CallKind sub-enum instead.
A little bit unrelatedly, copying into destination value for a certain kind of invoke, is also
implemented here. See the associated comment in code for various details that arise with this
implementation.
DivergingCall is different enough from the regular converging Call to warrant the split. This also
inlines CallData struct and creates a new CallTargets enum in order to have a way to differentiate
between calls that do not have an associated cleanup block.
Note, that this patch still does not produce DivergingCall terminator anywhere. Look for that in
the next patches.
So far, calls going through `Fn::call`, `FnMut::call_mut`, or `FnOnce::call_once` have not been translated properly into MIR:
The call `f(a, b, c)` where `f: Fn(T1, T2, T3)` would end up in MIR as:
```
call `f` with arguments `a`, `b`, `c`
```
What we really want is:
```
call `Fn::call` with arguments `f`, `a`, `b`, `c`
```
This PR transforms these kinds of overloaded calls during `HIR -> HAIR` translation.
What's still a bit funky is that the `Fn` traits expect arguments to be tupled but due to special handling type-checking and trans, we do not actually tuple arguments and everything still checks out fine. So, after this PR we end up with MIR containing calls where function signature and arguments seemingly don't match:
```
call Fn::call(&self, args: (T1, T2, T3)) with arguments `f`, `a`, `b`, `c`
```
instead of
```
call Fn::call(&self, args: (T1, T2, T3)) with arguments `f`, (`a`, `b`, `c`) // <- args tupled!
```
It would be nice if the call traits could go without special handling in MIR and later on.
Previously, all references to closure arguments went to the argument before the one they should (e.g. to `arg1` when it was supposed to go to `arg2`). This was because the MIR builder did not account for the implicit arguments that come before the explicit arguments, and closures have one implicit argument - the struct containing the captures.
This is my test code and a diff of the MIR generated for the closure:
```rust
let a = 2i32;
let _f = |b: i32| -> i32 { a + b }:
```
```diff
--- old 2015-12-29 23:16:32.027926372 -0600
+++ new 2015-12-29 23:16:42.975400757 -0600
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
fn(arg0: &[closure@closure-args.rs:8:14: 8:39 a:&i32], arg1: i32) -> i32 {
let var0: i32; // b
let tmp0: ();
let tmp1: i32;
let tmp2: i32;
bb0: {
- var0 = arg0;
+ var0 = arg1;
tmp1 = (*(*arg0).0);
tmp2 = var0;
ReturnPointer = Add(tmp1, tmp2);
goto -> bb1;
}
bb1: {
return;
}
bb2: {
diverge;
}
}
```
(If you're wondering where this text MIR output comes from, it's from another branch of mine waiting on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/30602 to get merged.)
The previous version using `PartialOrd::le` was broken since it passed `T`
arguments where `&T` was expected.
It makes sense to use primitive comparisons since range patterns can only be
used with chars and numeric types.
Previously, all references to closure arguments went to the argument before the
one they should (e.g. to arg1 when it was supposed to be arg2). This was because
the MIR builder did not account for the implicit arguments that come before the
explicit arguments, and closures have one implicit argument - the struct
containing the captures.
