Generate ADTs for tuple-like constructors instead
Previously we would generate regular calls for these, which is likely to result in worse LLVM code, especially in presence of cleanups – we needn’t unecessarilly generate landing pads to construct an ADT!
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f4e317e45
commit
4b17e2b71a
@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ impl<'tcx> Mirror<'tcx> for &'tcx hir::Expr {
|
||||
// Find the actual method implementation being called and
|
||||
// build the appropriate UFCS call expression with the
|
||||
// callee-object as self parameter.
|
||||
|
||||
let method = method_callee(cx, self, ty::MethodCall::expr(self.id));
|
||||
let mut argrefs = vec![fun.to_ref()];
|
||||
argrefs.extend(args.iter().map(|a| a.to_ref()));
|
||||
@ -64,12 +63,40 @@ impl<'tcx> Mirror<'tcx> for &'tcx hir::Expr {
|
||||
args: argrefs,
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ExprKind::Call {
|
||||
ty: &cx.tcx.node_id_to_type(fun.id),
|
||||
fun: fun.to_ref(),
|
||||
args: args.to_ref(),
|
||||
let adt_data = if let hir::ExprPath(..) = fun.node {
|
||||
// Tuple-like ADTs are represented as ExprCall. We convert them here.
|
||||
expr_ty.ty_adt_def().and_then(|adt_def|{
|
||||
match cx.tcx.def_map.borrow()[&fun.id].full_def() {
|
||||
def::DefVariant(_, variant_id, false) => {
|
||||
Some((adt_def, adt_def.variant_index_with_id(variant_id)))
|
||||
},
|
||||
def::DefStruct(_) => {
|
||||
Some((adt_def, 0))
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => None
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else { None };
|
||||
if let Some((adt_def, index)) = adt_data {
|
||||
let substs = cx.tcx.mk_substs(cx.tcx.node_id_item_substs(fun.id).substs);
|
||||
let field_refs = args.iter().enumerate().map(|(idx, e)| FieldExprRef {
|
||||
name: Field::new(idx),
|
||||
expr: e.to_ref()
|
||||
}).collect();
|
||||
ExprKind::Adt {
|
||||
adt_def: adt_def,
|
||||
substs: substs,
|
||||
variant_index: index,
|
||||
fields: field_refs,
|
||||
base: None
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ExprKind::Call {
|
||||
ty: cx.tcx.node_id_to_type(fun.id),
|
||||
fun: fun.to_ref(),
|
||||
args: args.to_ref(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -549,10 +576,11 @@ fn convert_path_expr<'a, 'tcx: 'a>(cx: &mut Cx<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr)
|
||||
def::DefFn(def_id, _) => (def_id, ItemKind::Function),
|
||||
def::DefMethod(def_id) => (def_id, ItemKind::Method),
|
||||
def::DefStruct(def_id) => match cx.tcx.node_id_to_type(expr.id).sty {
|
||||
// A tuple-struct constructor.
|
||||
// A tuple-struct constructor. Should only be reached if not called in the same
|
||||
// expression.
|
||||
ty::TyBareFn(..) => (def_id, ItemKind::Function),
|
||||
// This is a special case: a unit struct which is used as a value. We return a
|
||||
// completely different ExprKind here to account for this special case.
|
||||
// A unit struct which is used as a value. We return a completely different ExprKind
|
||||
// here to account for this special case.
|
||||
ty::TyStruct(adt_def, substs) => return ExprKind::Adt {
|
||||
adt_def: adt_def,
|
||||
variant_index: 0,
|
||||
@ -563,7 +591,8 @@ fn convert_path_expr<'a, 'tcx: 'a>(cx: &mut Cx<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr)
|
||||
ref sty => panic!("unexpected sty: {:?}", sty)
|
||||
},
|
||||
def::DefVariant(enum_id, variant_id, false) => match cx.tcx.node_id_to_type(expr.id).sty {
|
||||
// A variant constructor.
|
||||
// A variant constructor. Should only be reached if not called in the same
|
||||
// expression.
|
||||
ty::TyBareFn(..) => (variant_id, ItemKind::Function),
|
||||
// A unit variant, similar special case to the struct case above.
|
||||
ty::TyEnum(adt_def, substs) => {
|
||||
@ -900,6 +929,7 @@ fn loop_label<'a, 'tcx: 'a>(cx: &mut Cx<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr) -> Cod
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Converts a list of named fields (i.e. for struct-like struct/enum ADTs) into FieldExprRef.
|
||||
fn field_refs<'tcx>(variant: VariantDef<'tcx>,
|
||||
fields: &'tcx [hir::Field])
|
||||
-> Vec<FieldExprRef<'tcx>>
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user