internal: Consider all kinds of explicit private imports in find_path
Builds on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16265 to make things a bit more general, now we consider all explicit private imports.
fix: Acknowledge `pub(crate)` imports in import suggestions
rust-analyzer has logic that discounts suggesting `use`s for private imports, but that logic is unnecessarily strict - for instance given this code:
```rust
mod foo {
pub struct Foo;
}
pub(crate) use self::foo::*;
mod bar {
fn main() {
Foo$0;
}
}
```
... RA will suggest to add `use crate::foo::Foo;`, which not only makes the code overly verbose (especially in larger code bases), but also is disjoint with what rustc itself suggests.
This commit adjusts the logic, so that `pub(crate)` imports are taken into account when generating the suggestions; considering rustc's behavior, I think this change doesn't warrant any extra configuration flag.
Note that this is my first commit to RA, so I guess the approach taken here might be suboptimal - certainly feels somewhat hacky, maybe there's some better way of finding out the optimal import path 😅
rust-analyzer has logic that discounts suggesting `use`s for private
imports, but that logic is unnecessarily strict - for instance given
this code:
```rust
mod foo {
pub struct Foo;
}
pub(crate) use self::foo::*;
mod bar {
fn main() {
Foo$0;
}
}
```
... RA will suggest to add `use crate::foo::Foo;`, which not only makes
the code overly verbose (especially in larger code bases), but also is
disjoint with what rustc itself suggests.
This commit adjusts the logic, so that `pub(crate)` imports are taken
into account when generating the suggestions; considering rustc's
behavior, I think this change doesn't warrant any extra configuration
flag.
Note that this is my first commit to RA, so I guess the approach taken
here might be suboptimal - certainly feels somewhat hacky, maybe there's
some better way of finding out the optimal import path 😅
Replace SourceRootCrates hashset output with slice for deterministic order
We only iterate over the result, and its pretty small in general so no point for the `HashSet` (additionally this way we get a more defined iteration order).
minor: Mark unresolved associated item diagnostic as experimental
Per #16327 unresolved associated item has false positives. Mark the diagnostic as experimental until this is more dependable.
Preserve comments for extracted block expression in 'extract_function'
Fix#14371
Preserve comments for extracted block expression in 'extract_function'.
In the original implementation, `block.statements()` was used to construct a new function, removing the comments within the block. In the updated implementation, we use manual traversal of nodes and `hacky_block_expr` to generate a new block, thereby preserving the comments.
Resolve panic in `generate_delegate_methods`
Fixes#16276
This PR addresses two issues:
1. When using `PathTransform`, it searches for the node corresponding to the `path` in the `source_scope` during `make::fn_`. Therefore, we need to perform the transform before `make::fn_` (similar to the problem in issue #15804). Otherwise, even though the tokens are the same, their offsets (i.e., `span`) differ, resulting in the error "Can't find CONST_ARG@xxx."
2. As mentioned in the first point, `PathTransform` searches for the node corresponding to the `path` in the `source_scope`. Thus, when transforming paths, we should update nodes from right to left (i.e., use **reverse of preorder** (right -> left -> root) instead of **postorder** (left -> right -> root)). Reasons are as follows:
In the red-green tree (rowan), we do not store absolute ranges but instead store the length of each node and dynamically calculate offsets (spans). Therefore, when modifying the left-side node (such as nodes are inserted or deleted), it causes all right-side nodes' spans to change. This, in turn, leads to PathTransform being unable to find nodes with the same paths (due to different spans), resulting in errors.
fix: Fix `ast::Path::segments` implementation
calling `ast::Path::segments` on a qualifier currently returns all the segments of the top path instead of just the segments of the qualifier.
The issue can be summarized by the simple failing test below:
```rust
#[test]
fn path_segments() {
//use ra_ap_syntax::ast;
let path: ast::Path = ...; // e.g. `ast::Path` for "foo::bar::item".
let path_segments: Vec<_> = path.segments().collect();
let qualifier_segments: Vec<_> = path.qualifier().unwrap().segments().collect();
assert_eq!(path_segments.len(), qualifier_segments.len() + 1); // Fails because `LHS = RHS`.
}
```
This PR:
- Fixes the implementation of `ast::Path::segments`
- Fixes `ast::Path::segments` callers that either implicitly relied on behavior of previous implementation or exhibited other "wrong" behavior directly related to the result of `ast::Path::segments` (all callers have been reviewed, only one required modification)
- Removes unnecessary (and now unused) `ast::Path::segments` alternatives
Bump follow-redirects from 1.15.2 to 1.15.4 in /editors/code
Bumps [follow-redirects](https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects) from 1.15.2 to 1.15.4.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a href="65858205e5"><code>6585820</code></a> Release version 1.15.4 of the npm package.</li>
<li><a href="7a6567e16d"><code>7a6567e</code></a> Disallow bracketed hostnames.</li>
<li><a href="05629af696"><code>05629af</code></a> Prefer native URL instead of deprecated url.parse.</li>
<li><a href="1cba8e85fa"><code>1cba8e8</code></a> Prefer native URL instead of legacy url.resolve.</li>
<li><a href="72bc2a4229"><code>72bc2a4</code></a> Simplify _processResponse error handling.</li>
<li><a href="3d42aecdca"><code>3d42aec</code></a> Add bracket tests.</li>
<li><a href="bcbb096b32"><code>bcbb096</code></a> Do not directly set Error properties.</li>
<li><a href="192dbe7ce6"><code>192dbe7</code></a> Release version 1.15.3 of the npm package.</li>
<li><a href="bd8c81e4f3"><code>bd8c81e</code></a> Fix resource leak on destroy.</li>
<li><a href="9c728c314b"><code>9c728c3</code></a> Split linting and testing.</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/compare/v1.15.2...v1.15.4">compare view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting ``@dependabot` rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- ``@dependabot` rebase` will rebase this PR
- ``@dependabot` recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
- ``@dependabot` merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- ``@dependabot` squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- ``@dependabot` cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
- ``@dependabot` reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- ``@dependabot` close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- ``@dependabot` show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- ``@dependabot` ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- ``@dependabot` ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- ``@dependabot` ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/network/alerts).
</details>
fix: Differentiate between vfs config load and file changed events
Kind of fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/14730 in a pretty bad way. We need to rethink the vfs-notify layer entirely. For a decent fix.
