fail!() used to require owned strings but can handle static strings
now. Also, it can pass its arguments to fmt!() on its own, no need for
the caller to call fmt!() itself.
In rustpkg, pass around sysroot; in rustpkg tests, set the sysroot
manually so that tests can find libcore and such.
With bonus metadata::filesearch refactoring to avoid copies.
The install command should work now, though it only installs
in-place (anything else has to wait until I implement RUST_PATH).
Also including:
core: Add remove_directory_recursive, change copy_file
Make copy_file preserve permissions, and add a remove_directory_recursive
function.
rustpkg now searches for package directories in ./src rather than
in . . I also added a rudimentary RUST_PATH that's currently
hard-wired to the current directory. rustpkg now uses src/, lib/,
and build/ directories as described in the manual.
Most of the existing test scenarios build now; the README file
(in a separate commit) explains which ones.
1. Fail when there's no package script and no crates named
main.rs, lib.rs, bench.rs, or test.rs.
2. Inject the crate link_meta "name" and "vers" attributes, so
that the output file gets named correctly in the library case.
3. Normalize '-' to '_' in package names.
r? @graydon
Pulled out tests into their own modules inside the files they test,
as per the draft style guidelines.
Started a new module, path_util, for utility functions to do with
paths and directories.
Changed default_dest_dir to use a condition and return Path
instead of Option<Path>.
Pulled out tests into their own modules inside the files they test,
as per the draft style guidelines.
Started a new module, path_util, for utility functions to do with
paths and directories.
Changed default_dest_dir to use a condition and return Path
instead of Option<Path>.
r? @graydon This is preliminary work on bringing rustpkg up to conformance with #5679
and related issues.
This change makes rustpkg infer a package ID from its containing directory,
instead of requiring name and vers attributes in the code. Many aspects of it
are incomplete; I've only tested one package (see README.txt) and one command,
"build". So far it only works for local packages.
I also removed code for several of the package commands other than "build",
replacing them with stubs that fail, since they used package IDs in ways that
didn't jibe well with the new scheme. I will re-implement the commands one
at a time.
This is preliminary work on bringing rustpkg up to conformance with #5679
and related issues.
This change makes rustpkg infer a package ID from its containing directory,
instead of requiring name and vers attributes in the code. Many aspects of it
are incomplete; I've only tested one package (see README.txt) and one command,
"build". So far it only works for local packages.
I also removed code for several of the package commands other than "build",
replacing them with stubs that fail, since they used package IDs in ways that
didn't jibe well with the new scheme. I will re-implement the commands one
at a time.
Two changes:
- The first fixes an inconsistency in coherence whereby extension methods were added to the inherent methods table, but only in cross-crate scenarios. This causes some minor fallout in tests and so forth. In one case (comm) I added inherent and trait methods so as to avoid the need to import traits like `GenericPort` just to use a port.
- The second makes objects not implement the associated trait, as discussed in #5087.
r? @pcwalton
