8183: Fix missing command error with macros r=Veykril a=brandondong
**Reproduction:**
1. Define a struct through a macro (can be via `macro_rules`, proc macro, or `include!()`).
2. !!MISSING: command!! annotation appears. Clicking on it results in an error message. No matter where the macro is called/defined, the annotation is always at the start of the file.
**Cause:**
- For struct `A`, a `HasImpls` annotation is added just like for struct `B`. Unlike `B`, the file id for `A` is not the file we are adding annotations to but a macro file.
- The resolving step of the code lens does not succeed.
**Fix:**
- Check that the files match before computing offsets and adding `HasImpls`/`HasReferences` annotations.
Co-authored-by: Brandon <brandondong604@hotmail.com>
8162: Compute more mathematically well-rounded notion of transitive deps r=Veykril a=matklad
By including the crate itself, we make the resulting set closed with
respect to `transitve_reveres_dependencies` operation, as it becomes a
proper transitive closure. This just feels more proper and mathy.
And, indeed, this actually allows us to simplify call sites somewhat.
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
By including the crate itself, we make the resulting set closed with
respect to `transitve_reveres_dependencies` operation, as it becomes a
proper transitive closure. This just feels more proper and mathy.
And, indeed, this actually allows us to simplify call sites somewhat.
8142: temp disable broken ref match completions for struct fields/methods r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
This PR implements a temporary workaround for #8058 by disabling ref match completions for struct fields and methods. Disabling this doesn't break any existing functionality (that I am aware of) since these completions were broken.
I plan to keep working on a real fix for the underlying issue here, but I think a proper fix could take some time, so I'd prefer to quickly fix the bug to buy some more time to implement a better solution (which would ultimately allow re-enabling ref matches for struct fields and methods).
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
8154: rewrite merge use trees assist to use muatable syntax trees r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
8155: Fix confusion between parameters and the function r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8152
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
8136: Introduce QuantifiedWhereClause and DynTy analogous to Chalk r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This introduces a bunch of new binders in lots of places, which we have to be careful about, but we had to add them at some point. There's a lot of skipping of the binders; once we're done with the Chalk move, we should review the remaining ones.
8146: Document patch policy r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
This in particular means storing a chalk_ir::Environment, not our
TraitEnvironment. This makes InEnvironment not usable for Type, where we
need to keep the full TraitEnvironment.
8134: Correct the paths of submodules from the include! macro r=edwin0cheng a=sticnarf
This PR should fix#7846. It mostly follows the instructions from @edwin0cheng in that issue.
Co-authored-by: Yilin Chen <sticnarf@gmail.com>
8133: Ignore type bindings in generic_predicates_for_param (fix panic on ena and crates depending on it) r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This allows us to handle more cases without a query cycle, which includes certain cases that rustc accepted. That in turn means we avoid triggering salsa-rs/salsa#257 on valid code (it will still happen if the user writes an actual cycle).
We actually accept more definitions than rustc now; that's because rustc only ignores bindings when looking up super traits, whereas we now also ignore them when looking for predicates to disambiguate associated type shorthand. We could introduce a separate query for super traits if necessary, but for now I think this should be fine.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
8132: Add `'` to trigger_characters, allowing more direct lifetime completions r=Veykril a=Veykril
Fixes having to type a character after `'` to complete lifetimes and labels
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
This allows us to handle more cases without a query cycle, which
includes certain cases that rustc accepted. That in turn means we avoid
triggering salsa-rs/salsa#257 on valid code (it will still happen if the
user writes an actual cycle).
We actually accept more definitions than rustc now; that's because rustc
only ignores bindings when looking up super traits, whereas we now also
ignore them when looking for predicates to disambiguate associated type
shorthand. We could introduce a separate query for super traits if
necessary, but for now I think this should be fine.
8122: Make bare underscore token an Ident rather than Punct in proc-macro r=edwin0cheng a=kevinmehall
In rustc and proc-macro2, a bare `_` token is parsed for procedural macro purposes as `Ident` rather than `Punct` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48842). This changes rust-analyzer to match rustc's behavior and implementation by handling `_` as an Ident in token trees, but explicitly preventing `$x:ident` from matching it in MBE.
proc macro crate:
```rust
#[proc_macro]
pub fn input(input: proc_macro::TokenStream) -> proc_macro::TokenStream {
dbg!(input)
}
```
test crate:
```rust
test_proc_macro::input!(_);
```
output (rustc):
```rust
[test-proc-macro/src/lib.rs:10] input = TokenStream [
Ident {
ident: "_",
span: #0 bytes(173..174),
},
]
```
output (rust-analyzer before this change):
```rust
[test-proc-macro/src/lib.rs:10] input = TokenStream [
Punct {
ch: '_',
spacing: Joint,
span: 4294967295,
},
]
```
output (rust-analyzer after this change):
```rust
[test-proc-macro/src/lib.rs:10] input = TokenStream [
Ident {
ident: "_",
span: 4294967295,
},
]
```
Co-authored-by: Kevin Mehall <km@kevinmehall.net>
8124: Add basic lifetime completion r=Veykril a=Veykril
This adds basic lifetime completion, basic in the sense that the completions for lifetimes are only shown when the user enters `'` followed by a char. Showing them when nothing is entered is kind of a pain, as we would want them to only show up where they are useful which in turn requires a lot of tree traversal and cursor position checking to verify whether the position is valid for a lifetime. This in itself doesn't seem too bad as usually when you know you want to write a lifetime putting `'` to ask for lifetime completions seems fine.
~~I'll take a look at whether its possible to lift the restriction of having to put a char after `'`.~~ This actually already works so I guess this is the clients responsibility, in which case VSCode doesn't like it.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
