Rename and allow `cast_ref_to_mut` lint
This PR is a small subset of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112431, that is the renaming of the lint (`cast_ref_to_mut` -> `invalid_reference_casting`).
BUT also temporarily change the default level of the lint from deny-by-default to allow-by-default until https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112431 is merged.
r? `@Nilstrieb`
fix(resolve): update the ambiguity glob binding as warning recursively
Fixes#47525Fixes#56593, but `issue-56593-2.rs` is not fixed to ensure backward compatibility.
Fixes#98467Fixes#105235Fixes#112713
This PR had added a field called `warn_ambiguous` in `NameBinding` which is only for back compatibly reason and used for lint.
More details: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112743
r? `@petrochenkov`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113773 (Don't attempt to compute layout of type referencing error)
- #114107 (Prevent people from assigning me as a PR reviewer)
- #114124 (tests/ui/proc-macro/*: Migrate FIXMEs to check-pass)
- #114171 (Fix switch-stdout test for none unix/windows platforms)
- #114172 (Fix issue_15149 test for the SGX target)
- #114173 (btree/map.rs: remove "Basic usage" text)
- #114174 (doc: replace wrong punctuation mark)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
tests/ui/proc-macro/*: Migrate FIXMEs to check-pass
proc-macros are processed early in the compiler pipeline. There is no need to involve codegen. So change to check-pass.
I have also looked through each changed test and to me it is sufficiently clear that codegen is not needed for the purpose of the test.
I skipped changing `tests/ui/proc-macro/no-missing-docs.rs` in this commit because it was not clear to me that it can be changed to check-pass.
Part of #62277
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114099 (privacy: no nominal visibility for assoc fns )
- #114128 (When flushing delayed span bugs, write to the ICE dump file even if it doesn't exist)
- #114138 (Adjust spans correctly for fn -> method suggestion)
- #114146 (Skip reporting item name when checking RPITIT GAT's associated type bounds hold)
- #114147 (Insert RPITITs that were shadowed by missing ADTs that resolve to [type error])
- #114155 (Replace a lazy `RefCell<Option<T>>` with `OnceCell<T>`)
- #114164 (Add regression test for `--cap-lints allow` and trait bounds warning)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add regression test for `--cap-lints allow` and trait bounds warning
Closes#43134
I have verified that the test fails if stderr begins to contain output by making sure the test fails when I add
eprintln!("some output on stderr");
to the compiler (I added it to `fn build_session()`).
Skip reporting item name when checking RPITIT GAT's associated type bounds hold
Doesn't really make sense to label an item that has a name that users can't really mention. Fixes#114145. Also fixes#113794.
r? `@spastorino`
privacy: no nominal visibility for assoc fns
Fixes#113860.
When `staged_api` is enabled, effective visibilities are computed earlier and this can trigger an ICE in some cases.
In particular, if a impl of a trait method has a visibility then an error will be reported for that, but when privacy invariants are being checked, the effective visibility will still be greater than the nominal visbility and that will trigger a `span_bug!`.
However, this invariant - that effective visibilites are limited to nominal visibility - doesn't make sense for associated functions.
Diagnostic namespace
This PR implements the basic infrastructure for accepting the `#[diagnostic]` attribute tool namespace as specified in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3368. Note: This RFC is not merged yet, but it seems like it will be accepted soon. I open this PR early on to get feedback on the actual implementation as soon as possible. This hopefully enables getting at least the diagnostic namespace to stable rust "soon", so that crates do not need to bump their MSRV if we stabilize actual attributes in this namespace.
This PR only adds infrastructure accept attributes from this namespace, it does not add any specific attribute. Therefore the compiler will emit a lint warning for each attribute that's actually used. This namespace is added behind a feature flag, so it will be only available on a nightly compiler for now.
cc `@estebank` as they've supported me in planing, specifying and implementing this feature.
When `staged_api` is enabled, effective visibilities are computed earlier
and this can trigger an ICE in some cases.
In particular, if a impl of a trait method has a visibility then an error
will be reported for that, but when privacy invariants are being checked,
the effective visibility will still be greater than the nominal visbility
and that will trigger a `span_bug!`.
However, this invariant - that effective visibilites are limited to
nominal visibility - doesn't make sense for associated functions.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
I have verified that the test fails if stderr begins to contain output
by making sure the test fails when I add
eprintln!("some output on stderr");
to the compiler (I added it to `fn build_session()`).
Move two tests from `tests/ui/std` to `library/std/tests`
Hi, there,
This pull request comes from this issue (#99417), sorry I made some mistakes creating the pull request, it's my first one.
Regression test `println!()` panic message on `ErrorKind::BrokenPipe`
No existing test (that I could find) failed if the `panic!()` of the `println!()` family of functions was removed, or if its message was changed:
104f4300cf/library/std/src/io/stdio.rs (L1007-L1009)
So add such a test.
This is in preparation of adding a hint about the existence of [`unix_sigpipe`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889) if that is the reason for the panic.
Even if we don't end up adding a hint, this is still a sensible test to have, I think.
`@rustbot` label +A-testsuite +A-io +T-libs +O-unix
tests/ui/hello_world/main.rs: Remove FIXME (#62277)
The purpose of the test is to make sure that compiling hello world produces no compiler output. To properly test that, we need to run the entire compiler pipeline. We don't want the test to pass if codegen accidentally starts writing to stdout. So keep it as build-pass.
Part of #62277
Turns out opaque types can have hidden types registered during mir validation
See the newly added test's documentation for an explanation.
fixes#114121
proc-macros are processed early in the compiler pipeline. There is no
need to involve codegen. So change to check-pass.
I have also looked through each changed test and to me it is
sufficiently clear that codegen is not needed for the purpose of the
test.
I skipped changing tests/ui/proc-macro/no-missing-docs.rs in this commit
because it was not clear to me that it can be changed to check-pass.
The purpose of the test is to make sure that compiling hello world
produces no compiler output. To properly test that, we need to run the
entire compiler pipeline. We don't want the test to pass if codegen
accidentally starts writing to stdout. So keep it as build-pass.
Replace in-tree `rustc_apfloat` with the new version of the crate
Replace the in-tree version of `rustc_apfloat` with the new version of the crate which has been correctly licensed. The new crate incorporates upstream changes from LLVM since the original port was done including many correctness fixes and has been extensively fuzz tested to validate correctness.
Fixes#100233Fixes#102403Fixes#113407Fixes#113409Fixes#55993Fixes#93224Closes#93225Closes#109573
lint/ctypes: fix `()` return type checks
Fixes#113436.
`()` is normally FFI-unsafe, but is FFI-safe when used as a return type. It is also desirable that a transparent newtype for `()` is FFI-safe when used as a return type.
In order to support this, when a type was deemed FFI-unsafe, because of a `()` type, and was used in return type - then the type was considered FFI-safe. However, this was the wrong approach - it didn't check that the `()` was part of a transparent newtype! The consequence of this is that the presence of a `()` type in a more complex return type would make it the entire type be considered safe (as long as the `()` type was the first that the lint found) - which is obviously incorrect.
Instead, this logic is removed, and after [consultation with t-lang](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113436#issuecomment-1640756721), I've fixed the bugs and inconsistencies and made `()` FFI-safe within types.
I also refactor a function, but that's not too exciting.
new unstable option: -Zwrite-long-types-to-disk
This option guards the logic of writing long type names in files and instead using short forms in error messages in rustc_middle/ty/error behind a flag. The main motivation for this change is to disable this behaviour when running ui tests.
This logic can be triggered by running tests in a directory that has a long enough path, e.g. /my/very-long-path/where/rust-codebase/exists/
This means ui tests can fail depending on how long the path to their file is.
Some ui tests actually rely on this behaviour for their assertions, so for those we enable the flag manually.
Double check that hidden types match the expected hidden type
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113278 specifically, but I left a TODO for where we should also add some hardening.
It feels a bit like papering over the issue, but at least this way we don't get unsoundness, but just surprising errors. Errors will be improved and given spans before this PR lands.
r? `@compiler-errors` `@lcnr`
Don't say that a type is uncallable if its fn signature has errors in it
This is fallout from #106309, where we don't consider param-env candidates that reference errors because they unify with everything. This means, however, that we don't consider an APIT like `impl Fn(MissingType)` isn't considered to implement `Fn`, for example.
We can double-check that with a weaker heuristic [`extract_callable_info`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir_typeck/fn_ctxt/struct.FnCtxt.html#method.extract_callable_info), and suppress the knock-down error using that.
Fixes#113566
