Added back previously available exports:
* Forward/Backward: used when implementing `AnalysisDomain`
* Engine: used in user's code to solve the dataflow problem
* SwitchIntEdgeEffects: used when implementing functions of the `Analysis` trait
* graphviz: potentially useful for debugging purposes
These exports are used when implementing external tools based on MIR
dataflow framework.
Closes#120130
LLVM 18 x86 data layout update
With https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 LLVM now has i128 aligned to 16-bytes on x86 based platforms. This will be in LLVM-18. This patch updates all our spec targets to be 16-byte aligned, and removes the alignment when speaking to older LLVM.
This results in Rust overaligning things relative to LLVM on older LLVMs.
This implements MCP https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/683.
See #54341
Restrict access to the private field of newtype indexes
Well... we don't have the capability to forbid you to access private fields in the same module, and I don't want to add module shenanigans in the expansion of the macro. So... we just name the field creatively so that no one actually uses it.
Suggest `.swap()` when encountering conflicting borrows from `mem::swap` on a slice
This PR modifies the existing suggestion by matching on `[ProjectionElem::Deref, ProjectionElem::Index(_)]` instead of just `[ProjectionElem::Index(_)]`, which caused us to miss many cases. Additionally, it adds a more specific, machine-applicable suggestion in the case we determine `mem::swap` was used to swap elements in a slice.
Closes#102269
Don't add needs-triage to A-diagnostics
A-diagnostics is already labeled correctly thanks to the template and there usually isn't much to do on those issues, so it's fine to just add them to the pile.
never_patterns: typecheck never patterns
This checks that a `!` pattern is only used on an uninhabited type (modulo match ergonomics, i.e. `!` is allowed on `&Void`).
r? `@compiler-errors`
Change return type of unstable `Waker::noop()` from `Waker` to `&Waker`.
The advantage of this is that it does not need to be assigned to a variable to be used in a `Context` creation, which is the most common thing to want to do with a noop waker. It also avoids unnecessarily executing the dynamically dispatched drop function when the noop waker is dropped.
If an owned noop waker is desired, it can be created by cloning, but the reverse is harder to do since it requires declaring a constant. Alternatively, both versions could be provided, like `futures::task::noop_waker()` and `futures::task::noop_waker_ref()`, but that seems to me to be API clutter for a very small benefit, whereas having the `&'static` reference available is a large reduction in boilerplate.
[Previous discussion on the tracking issue starting here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98286#issuecomment-1862159766)
Exhaustiveness: simplify empty pattern logic
The logic that handles empty patterns had gotten quite convoluted. This PR simplifies it a lot. I tried to make the logic as easy as possible to follow; this only does logically equivalent changes.
The first commit is a drive-by comment clarification that was requested after another PR a while back.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Stabilize `slice_first_last_chunk`
This PR does a few different things based around stabilizing `slice_first_last_chunk`. They are split up so this PR can be by-commit reviewed, I can move parts to a separate PR if desired.
This feature provides a very elegant API to extract arrays from either end of a slice, such as for parsing integers from binary data.
## Stabilize `slice_first_last_chunk`
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/69
Implementation: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90091
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111774
This stabilizes the functionality from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111774:
```rust
impl [T] {
pub const fn first_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<&[T; N]>;
pub fn first_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<&mut [T; N]>;
pub const fn last_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<&[T; N]>;
pub fn last_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<&mut [T; N]>;
pub const fn split_first_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<(&[T; N], &[T])>;
pub fn split_first_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<(&mut [T; N], &mut [T])>;
pub const fn split_last_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<(&[T], &[T; N])>;
pub fn split_last_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<(&mut [T], &mut [T; N])>;
}
```
Const stabilization is included for all non-mut methods, which are blocked on `const_mut_refs`. This change includes marking the trivial function `slice_split_at_unchecked` const-stable for internal use (but not fully stable).
## Remove `split_array` slice methods
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90091
Implementation: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83233#pullrequestreview-780315524
This PR also removes the following unstable methods from the `split_array` feature, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90091:
```rust
impl<T> [T] {
pub fn split_array_ref<const N: usize>(&self) -> (&[T; N], &[T]);
pub fn split_array_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> (&mut [T; N], &mut [T]);
pub fn rsplit_array_ref<const N: usize>(&self) -> (&[T], &[T; N]);
pub fn rsplit_array_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> (&mut [T], &mut [T; N]);
}
```
This is done because discussion at #90091 and its implementation PR indicate a strong preference for nonpanicking APIs that return `Option`. The only difference between functions under the `split_array` and `slice_first_last_chunk` features is `Option` vs. panic, so remove the duplicates as part of this stabilization.
This does not affect the array methods from `split_array`. We will want to revisit these once `generic_const_exprs` is further along.
## Reverse order of return tuple for `split_last_chunk{,_mut}`
An unresolved question for #111774 is whether to return `(preceding_slice, last_chunk)` (`(&[T], &[T; N])`) or the reverse (`(&[T; N], &[T])`), from `split_last_chunk` and `split_last_chunk_mut`. It is currently implemented as `(last_chunk, preceding_slice)` which matches `split_last -> (&T, &[T])`. The first commit changes these to `(&[T], &[T; N])` for these reasons:
- More consistent with other splitting methods that return multiple values: `str::rsplit_once`, `slice::split_at{,_mut}`, `slice::align_to` all return tuples with the items in order
- More intuitive (arguably opinion, but it is consistent with other language elements like pattern matching `let [a, b, rest @ ..] ...`
- If we ever added a varidic way to obtain multiple chunks, it would likely return something in order: `.split_many_last::<(2, 4)>() -> (&[T], &[T; 2], &[T; 4])`
- It is the ordering used in the `rsplit_array` methods
I think the inconsistency with `split_last` could be acceptable in this case, since for `split_last` the scalar `&T` doesn't have any internal order to maintain with the other items.
## Unresolved questions
Do we want to reserve the same names on `[u8; N]` to avoid inference confusion? https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117561#issuecomment-1793388647
---
`slice_first_last_chunk` has only been around since early 2023, but `split_array` has been around since 2021.
`@rustbot` label -T-libs +T-libs-api -T-libs +needs-fcp
cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval,` `@scottmcm` who raised this topic, `@clarfonthey` implementer of `slice_first_last_chunk` `@jethrogb` implementer of `split_array`
Zulip discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Stabilizing.20array-from-slice.20*something*.3FFixes: #111774
use implied bounds compat mode in MIR borrowck
cc
- #119956
- #118553
This should hopefully fix bevy 🤔 `cargo test` ends up freezing my computer though, cargo build went from err to ok however 😁
r? `@jackh726`
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118665 (Consolidate all associated items on the NonZero integer types into a single impl block per type)
- #118798 (Use AtomicU8 instead of AtomicUsize in backtrace.rs)
- #119062 (Deny braced macro invocations in let-else)
- #119138 (Docs: Use non-SeqCst in module example of atomics)
- #119907 (Update `fn()` trait implementation docs)
- #120083 (Warn when not having a profiler runtime means that coverage tests won't be run/blessed)
- #120107 (dead_code treats #[repr(transparent)] the same as #[repr(C)])
- #120110 (Update documentation for Vec::into_boxed_slice to be more clear about excess capacity)
- #120113 (Remove myself from review rotation)
- #120118 (Fix typo in documentation in base.rs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
With https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 LLVM now has i128 aligned to
16-bytes on x86 based platforms. This will be in LLVM-18. This patch
updates all our spec targets to be 16-byte aligned, and removes the
alignment when speaking to older LLVM.
This results in Rust overaligning things relative to LLVM on older LLVMs.
This alignment change was discussed in rust-lang/compiler-team#683
See #54341 for additional information about why this is happening and
where this will be useful in the future.
This *does not* stabilize `i128`/`u128` for FFI.
A-diagnostics is already labeled correctly thanks to the template and there usually isn't much to do on those issues, so it's fine to just add them to the pile.
Update documentation for Vec::into_boxed_slice to be more clear about excess capacity
Currently, the documentation for Vec::into_boxed_slice says that "if the vector has excess capacity, its items will be moved into a newly-allocated buffer with exactly the right capacity." This is misleading, as copies do not necessarily occur, depending on if the allocator supports in-place shrinking. I copied some of the wording from shrink_to_fit, though it could potentially still be worded better than this.
dead_code treats #[repr(transparent)] the same as #[repr(C)]
In #92972 we enabled linting on unused fields in tuple structs. In #118297 that lint was enabled by default. That exposed issues like #119659, where the fields of a struct marked `#[repr(transparent)]` were reported by the `dead_code` lint. The language team [decided](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119659#issuecomment-1885172045) that the lint should treat `repr(transparent)` the same as `#[repr(C)]`.
Fixes#119659
Warn when not having a profiler runtime means that coverage tests won't be run/blessed
On a few occasions (e.g. #118036, #119984) people have been tripped up by the fact that half of the coverage test suite is skipped by default, because it `// needs-profiler-support` and the profiler runtime is not actually built in any of the default config profiles.
(This is made worse by the fact that it isn't enabled in any of the PR CI jobs either. So people think that they've successfully blessed the test suite, and then get a rude surprise when their merge only fails in the full CI job suite.)
This PR adds a simple warning to compiletest that should alert the user in some cases. It's not foolproof, but it should increase the chances of catching this problem earlier in the PR process.
Update `fn()` trait implementation docs
Fixes#119903
This was FCP'd and approved for the 1.70.0 release, this is just a docs update to match that change.
Docs: Use non-SeqCst in module example of atomics
I done this for this reasons:
1. The example now shows that there is more Orderings than just SeqCst.
2. People who would copy from example would now have more suitable orderings for the job.
3. SeqCst is both much harder to reason about and not needed in most situations.
IMHO, we should encourage people to think and use memory orderings that is suitable to task instead of blindly defaulting to SeqCst.
r? `@m-ou-se`
Consolidate all associated items on the NonZero integer types into a single impl block per type
**Before:**
```rust
#[repr(transparent)]
#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start(1)]
pub struct NonZeroI8(i8);
impl NonZeroI8 {
pub const fn new(n: i8) -> Option<Self> ...
pub const fn get(self) -> i8 ...
}
impl NonZeroI8 {
pub const fn leading_zeros(self) -> u32 ...
pub const fn trailing_zeros(self) -> u32 ...
}
impl NonZeroI8 {
pub const fn abs(self) -> NonZeroI8 ...
}
...
```
**After:**
```rust
#[repr(transparent)]
#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start(1)]
pub struct NonZeroI8(i8);
impl NonZeroI8 {
pub const fn new(n: i8) -> Option<Self> ...
pub const fn get(self) -> i8 ...
pub const fn leading_zeros(self) -> u32 ...
pub const fn trailing_zeros(self) -> u32 ...
pub const fn abs(self) -> NonZeroI8 ...
...
}
```
Having 6-7 different impl blocks per type is not such a problem in today's implementation, but becomes awful upon the switch to a generic `NonZero<T>` type (context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82363#issuecomment-921513910).
In the implementation from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100428, there end up being **67** impl blocks on that type.
<img src="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/1940490/5b68bd6f-8a36-4922-baa3-348e30dbfcc1" width="200"><img src="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/1940490/2cfec71e-c2cd-4361-a542-487f13f435d9" width="200"><img src="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/1940490/2fe00337-7307-405d-9036-6fe1e58b2627" width="200">
Without the refactor to a single impl block first, introducing `NonZero<T>` would be a usability regression compared to today's separate pages per type. With all those blocks expanded, Ctrl+F is obnoxious because you need to skip 12× past every match you don't care about. With all the blocks collapsed, Ctrl+F is useless. Getting to a state in which exactly one type's (e.g. `NonZero<u32>`) impl blocks are expanded while the rest are collapsed is annoying.
After this refactor to a single impl block, we can move forward with making `NonZero<T>` a generic struct whose docs all go on the same rustdoc page. The rustdoc will have 12 impl blocks, one per choice of `T` supported by the standard library. The reader can expand a single one of those impl blocks e.g. `NonZero<u32>` to understand the entire API of that type.
Note that moving the API into a generic `impl<T> NonZero<T> { ... }` is not going to be an option until after `NonZero<T>` has been stabilized, which may be months or years after its introduction. During the period while generic `NonZero` is unstable, it will be extra important to offer good documentation on all methods demonstrating the API being used through the stable aliases such as `NonZeroI8`.
This PR follows a `key = $value` syntax for the macros which is similar to the macros we already use for producing a single large impl block on the integer primitives.
1dd4db5062/library/core/src/num/mod.rs (L288-L309)
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
Optimize large array creation in const-eval
This changes repeated memcpy's to a memset for the case that we're propagating a single byte into a region of memory. It also optimizes the element-by-element copies to have a tighter loop; I'm pretty sure the old code was actually doing a multiply within each loop iteration.
For an 8GB array (`static SLICE: [u8; SIZE] = [0u8; 1 << 33];`) this takes us from ~23 seconds to ~6 seconds locally, which is spent roughly 50/50 in (a) memset to zero and (b) memcpy of the original place into a new place, when popping stack frame. The latter seems hard to avoid but is a big memcpy (since we're copying the type rather than initializing a region, so it's pretty fast), and the first is as good as it's going to get without special casing constant-valued arrays.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55795. (That issue's references to lint checking don't appear true anymore, but I think this closes that case as something that is slow due to *time* pretty fully. An 8GB array taking only 6 seconds feels reasonable enough to not merit further tracking).
Get rid of the hir_owner query.
This query was meant as a firewall between `hir_owner_nodes` which is supposed to change often, and the queries that only depend on the item signature. That firewall was inefficient, leaking the contents of the HIR body through `HirId`s.
`hir_owner` incurs a significant cost, as we need to hash HIR twice in multiple modes. This PR proposes to remove it, and simplify the hashing scheme.
For the future, `def_kind`, `def_span`... are much more efficient for incremental decoupling, and should be preferred.
change `.unwrap()` to `?` on write where `fmt::Result` is returned
Fixes#120090 which points out that some of the `.unwrap()`s in `rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs` are likely meant to be `?`s
Remove `next_root_ty_var`
Uhh we seem to not have any test that relies on this anymore. Maybe due to the way we changed alias-relate or whatever.
Removing this hack helper fn because #119106 is the general solution.
r? lcnr
