Rollup merge of #119835 - Nadrieril:simplify-empty-logic, r=compiler-errors
Exhaustiveness: simplify empty pattern logic The logic that handles empty patterns had gotten quite convoluted. This PR simplifies it a lot. I tried to make the logic as easy as possible to follow; this only does logically equivalent changes. The first commit is a drive-by comment clarification that was requested after another PR a while back. r? `@compiler-errors`
This commit is contained in:
commit
2587100a9b
@ -289,7 +289,8 @@ fn lower_pattern(
|
||||
fn is_known_valid_scrutinee(&self, scrutinee: &Expr<'tcx>) -> bool {
|
||||
use ExprKind::*;
|
||||
match &scrutinee.kind {
|
||||
// Both pointers and references can validly point to a place with invalid data.
|
||||
// Pointers can validly point to a place with invalid data. It is undecided whether
|
||||
// references can too, so we conservatively assume they can.
|
||||
Deref { .. } => false,
|
||||
// Inherit validity of the parent place, unless the parent is an union.
|
||||
Field { lhs, .. } => {
|
||||
|
@ -861,12 +861,14 @@ impl<Cx: TypeCx> ConstructorSet<Cx> {
|
||||
/// any) are missing; 2/ split constructors to handle non-trivial intersections e.g. on ranges
|
||||
/// or slices. This can get subtle; see [`SplitConstructorSet`] for details of this operation
|
||||
/// and its invariants.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, pcx, ctors), ret)]
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, ctors), ret)]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn split<'a>(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
pcx: &PlaceCtxt<'a, Cx>,
|
||||
ctors: impl Iterator<Item = &'a Constructor<Cx>> + Clone,
|
||||
) -> SplitConstructorSet<Cx> {
|
||||
) -> SplitConstructorSet<Cx>
|
||||
where
|
||||
Cx: 'a,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let mut present: SmallVec<[_; 1]> = SmallVec::new();
|
||||
// Empty constructors found missing.
|
||||
let mut missing_empty = Vec::new();
|
||||
@ -1006,17 +1008,6 @@ pub(crate) fn split<'a>(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We have now grouped all the constructors into 3 buckets: present, missing, missing_empty.
|
||||
// In the absence of the `exhaustive_patterns` feature however, we don't count nested empty
|
||||
// types as empty. Only non-nested `!` or `enum Foo {}` are considered empty.
|
||||
if !pcx.mcx.tycx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on()
|
||||
&& !(pcx.is_scrutinee && matches!(self, Self::NoConstructors))
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Treat all missing constructors as nonempty.
|
||||
// This clears `missing_empty`.
|
||||
missing.append(&mut missing_empty);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SplitConstructorSet { present, missing, missing_empty }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ fn analyze_ctors(
|
||||
) -> Result<SplitConstructorSet<'p, 'tcx>, ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
let column_ctors = self.patterns.iter().map(|p| p.ctor());
|
||||
let ctors_for_ty = &pcx.ctors_for_ty()?;
|
||||
Ok(ctors_for_ty.split(pcx, column_ctors))
|
||||
Ok(ctors_for_ty.split(column_ctors))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Does specialization: given a constructor, this takes the patterns from the column that match
|
||||
|
@ -737,15 +737,13 @@ pub(crate) struct PlaceCtxt<'a, Cx: TypeCx> {
|
||||
pub(crate) mcx: MatchCtxt<'a, Cx>,
|
||||
/// Type of the place under investigation.
|
||||
pub(crate) ty: Cx::Ty,
|
||||
/// Whether the place is the original scrutinee place, as opposed to a subplace of it.
|
||||
pub(crate) is_scrutinee: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, Cx: TypeCx> PlaceCtxt<'a, Cx> {
|
||||
/// A `PlaceCtxt` when code other than `is_useful` needs one.
|
||||
#[cfg_attr(not(feature = "rustc"), allow(dead_code))]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn new_dummy(mcx: MatchCtxt<'a, Cx>, ty: Cx::Ty) -> Self {
|
||||
PlaceCtxt { mcx, ty, is_scrutinee: false }
|
||||
PlaceCtxt { mcx, ty }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &Constructor<Cx>) -> usize {
|
||||
@ -768,9 +766,6 @@ pub(crate) fn ctors_for_ty(&self) -> Result<ConstructorSet<Cx>, Cx::Error> {
|
||||
pub enum ValidityConstraint {
|
||||
ValidOnly,
|
||||
MaybeInvalid,
|
||||
/// Option for backwards compatibility: the place is not known to be valid but we allow omitting
|
||||
/// `useful && !reachable` arms anyway.
|
||||
MaybeInvalidButAllowOmittingArms,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl ValidityConstraint {
|
||||
@ -778,20 +773,9 @@ pub fn from_bool(is_valid_only: bool) -> Self {
|
||||
if is_valid_only { ValidOnly } else { MaybeInvalid }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn allow_omitting_side_effecting_arms(self) -> Self {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
MaybeInvalid | MaybeInvalidButAllowOmittingArms => MaybeInvalidButAllowOmittingArms,
|
||||
// There are no side-effecting empty arms here, nothing to do.
|
||||
ValidOnly => ValidOnly,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn is_known_valid(self) -> bool {
|
||||
matches!(self, ValidOnly)
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn allows_omitting_empty_arms(self) -> bool {
|
||||
matches!(self, ValidOnly | MaybeInvalidButAllowOmittingArms)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// If the place has validity given by `self` and we read that the value at the place has
|
||||
/// constructor `ctor`, this computes what we can assume about the validity of the constructor
|
||||
@ -814,7 +798,7 @@ impl fmt::Display for ValidityConstraint {
|
||||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
|
||||
let s = match self {
|
||||
ValidOnly => "✓",
|
||||
MaybeInvalid | MaybeInvalidButAllowOmittingArms => "?",
|
||||
MaybeInvalid => "?",
|
||||
};
|
||||
write!(f, "{s}")
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1447,41 +1431,44 @@ fn compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness<'a, 'p, Cx: TypeCx>(
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("ty: {ty:?}");
|
||||
let pcx = &PlaceCtxt { mcx, ty, is_scrutinee: is_top_level };
|
||||
let pcx = &PlaceCtxt { mcx, ty };
|
||||
let ctors_for_ty = pcx.ctors_for_ty()?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Whether the place/column we are inspecting is known to contain valid data.
|
||||
let place_validity = matrix.place_validity[0];
|
||||
// For backwards compability we allow omitting some empty arms that we ideally shouldn't.
|
||||
let place_validity = place_validity.allow_omitting_side_effecting_arms();
|
||||
// We treat match scrutinees of type `!` or `EmptyEnum` differently.
|
||||
let is_toplevel_exception =
|
||||
is_top_level && matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::NoConstructors);
|
||||
// Whether empty patterns can be omitted for exhaustiveness.
|
||||
let can_omit_empty_arms = is_toplevel_exception || mcx.tycx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on();
|
||||
// Whether empty patterns are counted as useful or not.
|
||||
let empty_arms_are_unreachable = place_validity.is_known_valid() && can_omit_empty_arms;
|
||||
|
||||
// Analyze the constructors present in this column.
|
||||
let ctors = matrix.heads().map(|p| p.ctor());
|
||||
let ctors_for_ty = pcx.ctors_for_ty()?;
|
||||
let is_integers = matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::Integers { .. }); // For diagnostics.
|
||||
let split_set = ctors_for_ty.split(pcx, ctors);
|
||||
let mut split_set = ctors_for_ty.split(ctors);
|
||||
let all_missing = split_set.present.is_empty();
|
||||
|
||||
// Build the set of constructors we will specialize with. It must cover the whole type.
|
||||
// We need to iterate over a full set of constructors, so we add `Missing` to represent the
|
||||
// missing ones. This is explained under "Constructor Splitting" at the top of this file.
|
||||
let mut split_ctors = split_set.present;
|
||||
if !split_set.missing.is_empty() {
|
||||
// We need to iterate over a full set of constructors, so we add `Missing` to represent the
|
||||
// missing ones. This is explained under "Constructor Splitting" at the top of this file.
|
||||
split_ctors.push(Constructor::Missing);
|
||||
} else if !split_set.missing_empty.is_empty() && !place_validity.is_known_valid() {
|
||||
// The missing empty constructors are reachable if the place can contain invalid data.
|
||||
if !(split_set.missing.is_empty()
|
||||
&& (split_set.missing_empty.is_empty() || empty_arms_are_unreachable))
|
||||
{
|
||||
split_ctors.push(Constructor::Missing);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Decide what constructors to report.
|
||||
let is_integers = matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::Integers { .. });
|
||||
let always_report_all = is_top_level && !is_integers;
|
||||
// Whether we should report "Enum::A and Enum::C are missing" or "_ is missing".
|
||||
let report_individual_missing_ctors = always_report_all || !all_missing;
|
||||
// Which constructors are considered missing. We ensure that `!missing_ctors.is_empty() =>
|
||||
// split_ctors.contains(Missing)`. The converse usually holds except in the
|
||||
// `MaybeInvalidButAllowOmittingArms` backwards-compatibility case.
|
||||
// split_ctors.contains(Missing)`. The converse usually holds except when
|
||||
// `!place_validity.is_known_valid()`.
|
||||
let mut missing_ctors = split_set.missing;
|
||||
if !place_validity.allows_omitting_empty_arms() {
|
||||
missing_ctors.extend(split_set.missing_empty);
|
||||
if !can_omit_empty_arms {
|
||||
missing_ctors.append(&mut split_set.missing_empty);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut ret = WitnessMatrix::empty();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user