Add lint for panic!("{}")
This adds a lint that warns about `panic!("{}")`.
`panic!(msg)` invocations with a single argument use their argument as panic payload literally, without using it as a format string. The same holds for `assert!(expr, msg)`.
This lints checks if `msg` is a string literal (after expansion), and warns in case it contained braces. It suggests to insert `"{}", ` to use the message literally, or to add arguments to use it as a format string.
This lint is also a good starting point for adding warnings about `panic!(not_a_string)` later, once [`panic_any()`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74622) becomes a stable alternative.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #79119 (Clarify availability of atomic operations)
- #79123 (Add u128 and i128 integer tests)
- #79177 (Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments)
- #79181 (rustdoc: add [src] links to methods on a trait's page)
- #79183 (Make compiletest testing use the local sysroot)
- #79185 (expand/resolve: Pre-requisites to "Turn `#[derive]` into a regular macro attribute")
- #79193 (Revert #78969 "Normalize function type during validation")
- #79194 (Make as{_mut,}_slice on array::IntoIter public)
- #79204 (Add jyn514 email alias to mailmap)
- #79212 (Move `rustc_ty` -> `rustc_ty_utils`)
- #79217 (Add the "memcpy" doc alias to slice::copy_from_slice)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make as{_mut,}_slice on array::IntoIter public
The functions are useful in cases where you want to move data out of the IntoIter in bulk, by transmute_copy'ing the slice and then forgetting the IntoIter.
In the compiler, this is useful for providing a sped up IntoIter implementation. One can alternatively provide a separate allocate_array function but one can avoid duplicating some logic by passing everything through the generic iterator using interface.
As per suggestion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78569/files#r526506964
Make compiletest testing use the local sysroot
We already set `compiletest` to use the local sysroot in #68019, but
that missed the configuration for testing `compiletest` itself.
Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments
Add a test that checks whether the drop order of `let` bindings is consistent with the drop order of the corresponding destructuring assignments.
Thanks to ```@RalfJung``` for the suggesting this test ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79016#issuecomment-727608732)) and an implementation!
r? ```@RalfJung```
Clarify availability of atomic operations
This was noticed while we were updating the embedded rust book: https://github.com/rust-embedded/book/pull/273/files
These targets do natively have atomic load/stores, but do not support CAS operations.
Rollup of 14 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #78961 (Make bad "rust-call" arguments no longer ICE)
- #79082 (Improve the diagnostic for when an `fn` contains qualifiers inside an `extern` block.)
- #79090 (libary: Forward compiler-builtins "asm" and "mangled-names" feature)
- #79094 (Add //ignore-macos to pretty-std-collections.rs)
- #79101 (Don't special case constant operands when lowering intrinsics)
- #79102 (Add two regression tests)
- #79110 (Remove redundant notes in E0275)
- #79116 (compiletest: Fix a warning in debuginfo tests on windows-gnu)
- #79117 (add optimization fuel checks to some mir passes)
- #79147 (Highlight MIR as Rust on GitHub)
- #79149 (Move capture lowering from THIR to MIR)
- #79155 (fix handling the default config for profiler and sanitizers)
- #79156 (Allow using `download-ci-llvm` from directories other than the root)
- #79164 (Permit standalone generic parameters as const generic arguments in macros)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix handling the default config for profiler and sanitizers
#78354 don't handle the case that user don't add any target-specific config in `[target.*]` of `config.toml`:
```toml
changelog-seen = 2
[llvm]
link-shared = true
[build]
sanitizers = true
profiler = true
[install]
[rust]
[dist]
```
The previes code handle the default config in `Config::prase()`:
```rust
target.sanitizers = cfg.sanitizers.unwrap_or(build.sanitizers.unwrap_or_default());
target.profiler = cfg.profiler.unwrap_or(build.profiler.unwrap_or_default());
config.target_config.insert(TargetSelection::from_user(&triple), target);
```
In this case, `toml.target` don't contain any target, so the above code won't execute. Instead, a default `Target` is insert in c919f490bb/src/bootstrap/sanity.rs (L162-L166)
The default value for `bool` is false, hence the issue in #79124
This fix change the type of `sanitizers` and `profiler` to `Option<bool>`, so the default value is `None`, and fallback config is handled in `Config::sanitizers_enabled` and `Config::profiler_enabled`
fix#79124
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` `@richkadel`
Move capture lowering from THIR to MIR
This allows us to:
- Handle precise Places captured by a closure directly in MIR. Handling
captures in MIR is easier since we can rely on/ tweak PlaceBuilder to
generate `mir::Place`s that resemble how we store captures (`hir::Place`).
- Handle `let _ = x` case when feature `capture_disjoint_fields`
is enabled directly in MIR. This is required to be done in MIR since
patterns are desugared in MIR.
Closes: rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#25
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
add optimization fuel checks to some mir passes
Fixes#77402
Inserts a bunch of calls to `consider_optimizing`. Note that `consider_optimizing` is the method that actually decrements the fuel count, so the point at which it's called is when the optimization takes place, from a fuel perspective. This means that where we call it has some thought behind it:
1. We probably don't want to decrement the fuel count before other simple checks, otherwise we count an optimization as being performed even if nothing was mutated (ie. it returned early).
2. In cases like `InstCombine`, where we gather optimizations in a pass and then mutate values, we probably would rather skip the gathering pass for performance reasons rather than skip the mutations afterwards.
compiletest: Fix a warning in debuginfo tests on windows-gnu
The warning looked like this for me:
```
Warning: C:msys64homewerust./src/etc: No such file or directory.
```
It didn't affect actual testing because we don't currently emit gdb pretty-printer information into executables on windows-gnu.
Add //ignore-macos to pretty-std-collections.rs
On macOS the test is flaky and sometimes fails,
sometimes succeeds on CI.
This is no fix for the underlying issue,
but I feel the workaround is worth it as
the issue makes it harder
to get things merged into master.
cc #78665
libary: Forward compiler-builtins "asm" and "mangled-names" feature
In principle this is a followup of rust-lang/rust#78472. In the previous PR was the support of the test crate missing.
Now users will be able to do:
```
cargo build -Zbuild-std=core -Zbuild-std-features=compiler-builtins-asm
```
and correctly get the assembly implemenations for `memcpy` and friends.
Improve the diagnostic for when an `fn` contains qualifiers inside an `extern` block.
This mitigates #78941. As suggested by ```@estebank,``` `span_suggestion` was replaced with `span_suggestion_verbose` for this specific diagnostic.
Make bad "rust-call" arguments no longer ICE
The simplest of bad rust-call definitions will no longer cause an ICE. There is a FIXME added for future work, as I wanted to get this easy fix in before trying to either add a hack or mess with the whole obligation system
fixes#22565
Remove semicolon from internal `err` macro
This macro is used in expression position (a match arm), and only
compiles because of #33953
Regardless of what happens with that issue, this makes the
usage of the macro less confusing at the call site.
Remove Hacks and Fixmes from PR CI's LLVM-9 Container
Now with LLVM 9 being the minimum supported version (thanks to #78848 ), we can
finally remove the hacks in the dockerfile.
This wasn't in the main PR bumping the version as I didn't quite
understand what's going on and needed here.
Relevant issues and PRs:
- Issue #69823
- PR #70989
I hope I actually adressed things correctly here?
