Upgrade dlmalloc to version 0.2
In preparation of adding dynamic memory management support for SGXv2-enabled platforms, the dlmalloc crate has been refactored. More specifically, support has been added to implement platform specification outside of the dlmalloc crate. (see https://github.com/alexcrichton/dlmalloc-rs/pull/15)
This PR upgrades dlmalloc to version 0.2 for the `wasm` and `sgx` targets.
As the dlmalloc changes have received a positive review, but have not been merged yet, this PR contains a commit to prevent tidy from aborting CI prematurely.
cc: `@jethrogb`
Make the libstd build script smaller
Of all sysroot crates currently only compiler_builtins, miniz_oxide and std require a build script. compiler_builtins uses to conditionally enable certain features and possibly compile a C version ([source](63ccaf11f0/build.rs)), miniz_oxide only uses it to detect if liballoc is supported as the MSRV is 1.34.0 instead of the 1.36.0 which stabilized liballoc ([source](28514ec09f/miniz_oxide/build.rs)). std now only uses it to enable `freebsd12` when the `RUST_STD_FREEBSD_12_ABI` env var is set, to determine if `restricted-std` should be set, to set the `STD_ENV_ARCH` env var identical to `CARGO_CFG_TARGET_ARCH`, and to unconditionally enable `backtrace_in_libstd`.
If all build scripts were to be removed, it would be possible for rustc to completely compile it's own sysroot. It currently requires a rustc version that already has an available libstd to compile the build scripts. If rustc can completely compile it's own sysroot, rustbuild could be simplified to not forcefully use the bootstrap compiler for build scripts.
`@rustbot` modify labels: +T-compiler +libs-impl
RFC-2229: Implement Precise Capture Analysis
### This PR introduces
- Feature gate for RFC-2229 (incomplete) `capture_disjoint_field`
- Rustc Attribute to print out the capture analysis `rustc_capture_analysis`
- Precise capture analysis
### Description of the analysis
1. If the feature gate is not set then all variables that are not local to the closure will be added to the list of captures. (This is for backcompat)
2. The rest of the analysis is based entirely on how the captured `Place`s are used within the closure. Precise information (i.e. projections) about the `Place` is maintained throughout.
3. To reduce the amount of information we need to keep track of, we do a minimization step. In this step, we determine a list such that no Place within this list represents an ancestor path to another entry in the list. Check rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#9 for more detailed examples.
4. To keep the compiler functional as before we implement a Bridge between the results of this new analysis to existing data structures used for closure captures. Note the new capture analysis results are only part of MaybeTypeckTables that is the information is only available during typeck-ing.
### Known issues
- Statements like `let _ = x` will make the compiler ICE when used within a closure with the feature enabled. More generally speaking the issue is caused by `let` statements that create no bindings and are init'ed using a Place expression.
### Testing
We removed the code that would handle the case where the feature gate is not set, to enable the feature as default and did a bors try and perf run. More information here: #78762
### Thanks
This has been slowly in the works for a while now.
I want to call out `@Azhng` `@ChrisPardy` `@null-sleep` `@jenniferwills` `@logmosier` `@roxelo` for working on this and the previous PRs that led up to this, `@nikomatsakis` for guiding us.
Closesrust-lang/project-rfc-2229#7Closesrust-lang/project-rfc-2229#9Closesrust-lang/project-rfc-2229#6Closesrust-lang/project-rfc-2229#19
r? `@nikomatsakis`
For instances where `InstanceDef::requires_inline` is true, an attempt
is made to set an inline hint though a call to the `inline` function.
The attempt is ineffective, since all attributes will be usually removed
by the second call.
Fix the issue by applying the attributes only once, with user provided
attributes having a priority when provided.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #74989 (Implement `Index` and `IndexMut` for arrays)
- #76339 (Test structural matching for all range types)
- #77691 (Rename/Deprecate LayoutErr in favor of LayoutError)
- #78364 (Update RELEASES.md for 1.48.0)
- #78678 (Add tests and improve rendering of cfgs on traits)
- #78714 (Simplify output capturing)
- #78769 (Remove unneeded lifetimes in array/mod.rs)
- #78903 (BTreeMap: test chaotic ordering & other bits & bobs)
- #79032 (improve type const mismatch errors)
- #79061 (Make all rustdoc functions and structs crate-private)
- #79087 (Update E0744 about control flow in `const` contexts to accurately describe when the error is triggered and why)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
We'll try to use a weak `getrandom` symbol first, because that allows
things like `LD_PRELOAD` interposition. For example, perf measurements
might want to disable randomness to get reproducible results. If the
weak symbol is not found, we fall back to a raw `SYS_getrandom` call.
Update E0744 about control flow in `const` contexts to accurately describe when the error is triggered and why
This PR fixes#79083. `const fn` currently supports `if`, `match`, `loop`, and `while` in terms of control flow. The error relating to control flow in `const` contexts currently states that those control flow constructs are not allowed in `const` contexts. That is no longer true, as RFC 2342 and 2344 were [stabilized](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72437). `for` loops, however, as well as `?` and `.await` are still not allowed, so I changed the error message to be more descriptive of the error as it is not just control flow that could trigger this error. I also added links to tracking issues that mark things that are blocking the usage of these expressions.
improve type const mismatch errors
Doesn't completely remove `check_generic_arg_count` as that would have required some more complex changes but
instead checks type and const params in only one step. Also moved the help added by `@JulianKnodt` in #75611 to `generic_arg_mismatch_err`.
r? `@varkor` cc `@petrochenkov`
Simplify output capturing
This is a sequence of incremental improvements to the unstable/internal `set_panic` and `set_print` mechanism used by the `test` crate:
1. Remove the `LocalOutput` trait and use `Arc<Mutex<dyn Write>>` instead of `Box<dyn LocalOutput>`. In practice, all implementations of `LocalOutput` were just `Arc<Mutex<..>>`. This simplifies some logic and removes all custom `Sink` implementations such as `library/test/src/helpers/sink.rs`. Also removes a layer of indirection, as the outermost `Box` is now gone. It also means that locking now happens per `write_fmt`, not per individual `write` within. (So `"{} {}\n"` now results in one `lock()`, not four or more.)
2. Since in all cases the `dyn Write`s were just `Vec<u8>`s, replace the type with `Arc<Mutex<Vec<u8>>>`. This simplifies things more, as error handling and flushing can be removed now. This also removes the hack needed in the default panic handler to make this work with `::realstd`, as (unlike `Write`) `Vec<u8>` is from `alloc`, not `std`.
3. Replace the `RefCell`s by regular `Cell`s. The `RefCell`s were mostly used as `mem::replace(&mut *cell.borrow_mut(), something)`, which is just `Cell::replace`. This removes an unecessary bookkeeping and makes the code a bit easier to read.
4. Merge `set_panic` and `set_print` into a single `set_output_capture`. Neither the test crate nor rustc (the only users of this feature) have a use for using these separately. Merging them simplifies things even more. This uses a new function name and feature name, to make it clearer this is internal and not supposed to be used by other crates.
Might be easier to review per commit.
Rename/Deprecate LayoutErr in favor of LayoutError
Implements rust-lang/wg-allocators#73.
This patch renames LayoutErr to LayoutError, and uses a type alias to support users using the old name.
The new name will be instantly stable in release 1.49 (current nightly), the type alias will become deprecated in release 1.51 (so that when the current nightly is 1.51, 1.49 will be stable).
This is the only error type in `std` that ends in `Err` rather than `Error`, if this PR lands all stdlib error types will end in `Error` 🥰
Test structural matching for all range types
As of #70166 all range types (`core::ops::Range` etc.) can be structurally matched upon, and by extension used in const generics. In reference to the fact that this is a publicly observable property of these types, and thus falls under the Rust stability guarantees of the standard library, a regression test was added in #70283.
This regression test was implemented by me by testing for the ability to use the range types within const generics, but that is not the actual property the std guarantees now (const generics is still unstable). This PR addresses that situation by adding extra tests for the range types that directly test whether they can be structurally matched upon.
Note: also adds the otherwise unrelated test `test_range_to_inclusive` for completeness with the other range unit tests
Implement `Index` and `IndexMut` for arrays
Adds implementations of `Index` and `IndexMut` for arrays that simply forward to the slice indexing implementation in order to fix the following problem:
If you implement `Index<MyIndexType>` for an array, you lose all the other indexing functionality that used to be available to the array via its implicit coercion to a slice. An example of what I'm talking about:
```rust
use std::ops::Index;
pub enum MyIndexType {
_0, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7,
}
impl<T> Index<MyIndexType> for [T; 8] {
type Output = T;
fn index(&self, index: MyIndexType) -> &T {
unsafe { self.get_unchecked(index as usize) }
}
}
fn main() {
let array = [11u8; 8];
println!("{:?}", array[MyIndexType::_0]); // OK
println!("{:?}", array[0usize]); // error[E0277]
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `[u8; 8]` cannot be indexed by `usize`
}
```
This is a squash of these commits:
- Update E0744 about control flow in `const` contexts to reflect current status of `const fn`.
- E0744 isn't just about `for` loops or control flow
- Fix formatting on E0744 cause my editor decided to not copy it well
- Improve wording
- Fix a markdown formatting error
- Fix E0744's description as I interpreted some code wrong
- Fix a minor wording issue again
- Add a few more links to blocking issues
- Improve links to tracking issues
Now users will be able to do:
```
cargo build -Zbuild-std=core -Zbuild-std-features=compiler-builtins-asm
```
and correctly get the assembly implemenations for `memcpy` and friends.
