Attribute grammar in reference manual allowed `#[foo, bar]`, which does not match parser behavior.
Also rename nonterminals to match parser code.
Fix#13825.
for `~str`/`~[]`.
Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for
`Box<self>` before the snapshot.
r? @brson or @alexcrichton or whoever
for `~str`/`~[]`.
Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for
`Box<self>` before the snapshot.
How to update your code:
* Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`.
* Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`.
* Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`.
[breaking-change]
This primary fix brought on by this upgrade is the proper matching of the ```
and ~~~ doc blocks. This also moves hoedown to a git submodule rather than a
bundled repository.
Additionally, hoedown is stricter about code blocks, so this ended up fixing a
lot of invalid code blocks (ending with " ```" instead of "```", or ending with
"~~~~" instead of "~~~").
Closes#12776
This removes the `priv` keyword from the language and removes private enum
variants as a result. The remaining use cases of private enum variants were all
updated to be a struct with one private field that is a private enum.
RFC: 0006-remove-priv
Closes#13535
Before, normal compilation and the --crate-file-name flag would
generate output based on both #![crate_type] attributes and
--crate-type flags. Now, if one or more flag is specified by command
line, only those will be used.
Closes#11573.
In summary these are some example transitions this change makes:
'a || => ||: 'a
proc:Send() => proc():Send
The intended syntax for closures is to put the lifetime bound not at the front
but rather in the list of bounds. Currently there is no official support in the
AST for bounds that are not 'static, so this case is currently specially handled
in the parser to desugar to what the AST is expecting. Additionally, this moves
the bounds on procedures to the correct position, which is after the argument
list.
The current grammar for closures and procedures is:
procedure := 'proc' [ '<' lifetime-list '>' ] '(' arg-list ')'
[ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ]
closure := [ 'unsafe' ] ['<' lifetime-list '>' ] '|' arg-list '|'
[ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ]
lifetime-list := lifetime | lifetime ',' lifetime-list
arg-list := ident ':' type | ident ':' type ',' arg-list
bound-list := bound | bound '+' bound-list
bound := path | lifetime
This does not currently handle the << ambiguity in `Option<<'a>||>`, I am
deferring that to a later patch. Additionally, this removes the support for the
obsolete syntaxes of ~fn and &fn.
Closes#10553Closes#10767Closes#11209Closes#11210Closes#11211
The `Float` trait methods will be usable as functions via UFCS, and
we came to a consensus to remove duplicate functions like this a long
time ago.
It does still make sense to keep the duplicate functions when the trait
methods are static, unless the decision to leave out the in-scope trait
name resolution for static methods changes.
The `Float` trait methods will be usable as functions via UFCS, and
we came to a consensus to remove duplicate functions like this a long
time ago.
It does still make sense to keep the duplicate functions when the trait
methods are static, unless the decision to leave out the in-scope trait
name resolution for static methods changes.
This fixes some problems with
make verify-grammar
llnextgen still reports a lot of errors
FYI: My build directory /my-test/build is different from the source directory /my-test/rust.
cd /my-test/build
/my-test/rust/configure --prefix=/my-test/bin
make
make install
make verify-grammar
Summary:
So far, we've used the term POD "Plain Old Data" to refer to types that
can be safely copied. However, this term is not consistent with the
other built-in bounds that use verbs instead. This patch renames the Pod
kind into Copy.
RFC: 0003-opt-in-builtin-traits
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: cmr
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.octayn.net/D3
When calling
make verify-grammar
a lot of errors are reported by llnextgen.
Only simple errors like:
missing semicolons,
missing single quotes,
usage of parentheses instead of squared brackets or
usage of single quote instead of double quote
are fixed by this patch.
This can only be tested, when llnextgen is installed.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kobler <eng1@koblersystems.de>
When calling
make verify-grammar
or when llnextgen is not installed:
python2.7 src/etc/extract_grammar.py <src/doc/rust.md
an error is reported by extract_grammar.py that the
keyword "crate" is not defined.
This patch adds the keyword "crate" to the grammar in rust.md.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kobler <eng1@koblersystems.de>
While double-checking my understanding of the meaning of `'static`,
I made the following test program:
```rust
fn foo<X:'static>(_x: X) { }
#[cfg(not(acceptable))]
fn bar() {
let a = 3;
let b = &a;
foo(b);
}
#[cfg(acceptable)]
fn bar() {
static c : int = 4;;
let d : &'static int = &c;
foo(d);
}
fn main() {
bar();
}
```
Transcript of compiling above program, illustrating that the `--cfg
acceptable` variant of `bar` compiles successfully, showing that the
`'static` kind bound only disallows non-`static` references, not *all*
references:
```
% rustc --version
/Users/fklock/opt/rust-dbg/bin/rustc 0.10-pre (caf17fe 2014-03-21 02:21:50 -0700)
host: x86_64-apple-darwin
% rustc /tmp/s.rs
/tmp/s.rs:7:5: 7:8 error: instantiating a type parameter with an incompatible type `&int`, which does not fulfill `'static`
/tmp/s.rs:7 foo(b);
^~~
error: aborting due to previous error
% rustc --cfg acceptable /tmp/s.rs
% ./s
%
```
(Note that the explicit type annotation on `let d : &'static int` is
necessary; it did not suffice for me to just write `let d = &'static
c;`. That might be a latent bug, I am not sure yet.)
Anyway, a fix to the documentation seemed prudent.
