8183: Fix missing command error with macros r=Veykril a=brandondong
**Reproduction:**
1. Define a struct through a macro (can be via `macro_rules`, proc macro, or `include!()`).
2. !!MISSING: command!! annotation appears. Clicking on it results in an error message. No matter where the macro is called/defined, the annotation is always at the start of the file.
**Cause:**
- For struct `A`, a `HasImpls` annotation is added just like for struct `B`. Unlike `B`, the file id for `A` is not the file we are adding annotations to but a macro file.
- The resolving step of the code lens does not succeed.
**Fix:**
- Check that the files match before computing offsets and adding `HasImpls`/`HasReferences` annotations.
Co-authored-by: Brandon <brandondong604@hotmail.com>
8162: Compute more mathematically well-rounded notion of transitive deps r=Veykril a=matklad
By including the crate itself, we make the resulting set closed with
respect to `transitve_reveres_dependencies` operation, as it becomes a
proper transitive closure. This just feels more proper and mathy.
And, indeed, this actually allows us to simplify call sites somewhat.
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
By including the crate itself, we make the resulting set closed with
respect to `transitve_reveres_dependencies` operation, as it becomes a
proper transitive closure. This just feels more proper and mathy.
And, indeed, this actually allows us to simplify call sites somewhat.
8142: temp disable broken ref match completions for struct fields/methods r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
This PR implements a temporary workaround for #8058 by disabling ref match completions for struct fields and methods. Disabling this doesn't break any existing functionality (that I am aware of) since these completions were broken.
I plan to keep working on a real fix for the underlying issue here, but I think a proper fix could take some time, so I'd prefer to quickly fix the bug to buy some more time to implement a better solution (which would ultimately allow re-enabling ref matches for struct fields and methods).
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
8154: rewrite merge use trees assist to use muatable syntax trees r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
8155: Fix confusion between parameters and the function r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8152
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
8136: Introduce QuantifiedWhereClause and DynTy analogous to Chalk r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This introduces a bunch of new binders in lots of places, which we have to be careful about, but we had to add them at some point. There's a lot of skipping of the binders; once we're done with the Chalk move, we should review the remaining ones.
8146: Document patch policy r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
This in particular means storing a chalk_ir::Environment, not our
TraitEnvironment. This makes InEnvironment not usable for Type, where we
need to keep the full TraitEnvironment.
8134: Correct the paths of submodules from the include! macro r=edwin0cheng a=sticnarf
This PR should fix#7846. It mostly follows the instructions from @edwin0cheng in that issue.
Co-authored-by: Yilin Chen <sticnarf@gmail.com>
8133: Ignore type bindings in generic_predicates_for_param (fix panic on ena and crates depending on it) r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This allows us to handle more cases without a query cycle, which includes certain cases that rustc accepted. That in turn means we avoid triggering salsa-rs/salsa#257 on valid code (it will still happen if the user writes an actual cycle).
We actually accept more definitions than rustc now; that's because rustc only ignores bindings when looking up super traits, whereas we now also ignore them when looking for predicates to disambiguate associated type shorthand. We could introduce a separate query for super traits if necessary, but for now I think this should be fine.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
8132: Add `'` to trigger_characters, allowing more direct lifetime completions r=Veykril a=Veykril
Fixes having to type a character after `'` to complete lifetimes and labels
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
This allows us to handle more cases without a query cycle, which
includes certain cases that rustc accepted. That in turn means we avoid
triggering salsa-rs/salsa#257 on valid code (it will still happen if the
user writes an actual cycle).
We actually accept more definitions than rustc now; that's because rustc
only ignores bindings when looking up super traits, whereas we now also
ignore them when looking for predicates to disambiguate associated type
shorthand. We could introduce a separate query for super traits if
necessary, but for now I think this should be fine.
8122: Make bare underscore token an Ident rather than Punct in proc-macro r=edwin0cheng a=kevinmehall
In rustc and proc-macro2, a bare `_` token is parsed for procedural macro purposes as `Ident` rather than `Punct` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48842). This changes rust-analyzer to match rustc's behavior and implementation by handling `_` as an Ident in token trees, but explicitly preventing `$x:ident` from matching it in MBE.
proc macro crate:
```rust
#[proc_macro]
pub fn input(input: proc_macro::TokenStream) -> proc_macro::TokenStream {
dbg!(input)
}
```
test crate:
```rust
test_proc_macro::input!(_);
```
output (rustc):
```rust
[test-proc-macro/src/lib.rs:10] input = TokenStream [
Ident {
ident: "_",
span: #0 bytes(173..174),
},
]
```
output (rust-analyzer before this change):
```rust
[test-proc-macro/src/lib.rs:10] input = TokenStream [
Punct {
ch: '_',
spacing: Joint,
span: 4294967295,
},
]
```
output (rust-analyzer after this change):
```rust
[test-proc-macro/src/lib.rs:10] input = TokenStream [
Ident {
ident: "_",
span: 4294967295,
},
]
```
Co-authored-by: Kevin Mehall <km@kevinmehall.net>
8124: Add basic lifetime completion r=Veykril a=Veykril
This adds basic lifetime completion, basic in the sense that the completions for lifetimes are only shown when the user enters `'` followed by a char. Showing them when nothing is entered is kind of a pain, as we would want them to only show up where they are useful which in turn requires a lot of tree traversal and cursor position checking to verify whether the position is valid for a lifetime. This in itself doesn't seem too bad as usually when you know you want to write a lifetime putting `'` to ask for lifetime completions seems fine.
~~I'll take a look at whether its possible to lift the restriction of having to put a char after `'`.~~ This actually already works so I guess this is the clients responsibility, in which case VSCode doesn't like it.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
8083: Track source file IDs in source mapping of Attrs r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Fixes the panics/incorrect injection highlighting of outline module declarations until we figure out a nicer source mapping strategy for attributes.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
8065: Better handling of block doc comments r=Veykril a=Veykril
Moves doc string processing to `Attrs::docs`, as we need the indent info from all comments before being able to know how much to strip
Closes#7774
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
8063: couple clippy::complexity fixes r=matklad a=matthiaskrgr
avoid redundant `.into()` calls to convert T into identical T (`let x: String = String::from("hello").into();`)
use `if let Some(x)` instead of `.is_some()` + `.unwrap()`
don't clone Copy types
remove redundant wrapped ?s: `Some(Some(3)?)` can just be `Some(3)`
use `.map(|x| y)` instead of `and_then(|x| Some(y)` on `Option`s
Co-authored-by: Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de>
8052: minor style fixes per feedback on #8036 r=JoshMcguigan a=JoshMcguigan
cc @matklad - this PR addresses your comments in #8036.
changelog fixup #8036
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
7900: show function params in completion detail r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
This resolves#7842 by updating the detail for function completions from `-> T` to `fn(T, U) -> V`. I added an expicit unit test for this, `ide_completion::render::fn_detail_includes_args_and_return_type`, which passes.
Lots of other unit tests fail (~60 of them) due to this change, although I believe the failures are purely cosmetic (they were testing the exact format of this output). I'm happy to go update those tests, but before I do that I'd like to make sure this is in fact the format we want for the detail?
edit - I realized `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo test` automatically updates `expect!` tests. Big 👍 to whoever worked on that! So I'll go ahead and update all these tests soon. But I still would like to confirm `fn(T, U) -> V` is the desired content in the `detail` field.
8000: Use hir formatter for hover text r=matklad a=oxalica
Fix#2765 , (should) fix#4665
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
8036: completions: provide relevance bonus for enum types, and suggest ref matches for fn and enum r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
This PR makes several improvements to completions and completion sorting:
1. Provide exact match type relevance score bonus for enum variants
2. Suggest `&Foo` (ref_match) for enums if that is an exact type match
3. Suggest `&foo()` (ref_match) if `foo` returns a type which would be an exact match either with the reference or due to a `Deref` impl
### Before
### After
### Caveats
I think generic types will require some kind of fancier logic when testing for `exact_type_match`, so for now `Option`/`Result`/etc unfortunately still don't have great completions.
### Implementation
I implemented this in a way that I think makes it most likely for each completion type to be handled consistently. Just replace `CompletionItem::new` with `CompletionItem::new_with_type_info` and `exact_type_match`/`exact_name_match`/`ref_match` are all handled for you, in a way which is sure to be consistent across completion types.
This approach does introduce some coupling/plumbing that didn't exist before. Notice for example `set_is_local` on the builder, because `set_relevance` was removed from the builder to enforce that the relevance was built "properly" with `CompletionItem::new_with_type_info`. But I think there are benefits to this approach, like `CompletionRelevance` should probably consider deprecation status, and we already tell the builder about that, so in the (likely near term) future we can just pass that information along to `CompletionRelevance` when the user calls `set_deprecated` rather than the user having to manually set it in two places. This basically just hides `CompletionRelevance` from the individual completions, so they only worry about the `CompletionItem` interface. At the moment this seems like a cleaner approach to me, but I'm open to feedback here.
edit - I've reimplemented this in a simpler way, per feedback below.
8046: Prefer match to if let else r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
7970: Fix incorrect diagnostics for failing built in macros r=jonas-schievink a=brandondong
**Reproduction:**
1. Use a built in macro in such a way that rust-analyzer fails to expand it. For example:
**lib.rs**
```
include!("<valid file but without a .rs extension so it is not indexed by rust-analyzer>");
```
2. rust-analyzer highlights the macro call and says the macro itself cannot be resolved even though include! is in the standard library (unresolved-macro-call diagnostic).
3. No macro-error diagnostic is raised.
**Root cause for incorrect unresolved-macro-call diagnostic:**
1. collector:collect_macro_call is able to resolve include! in legacy scope but the expansion fails. Therefore, it's pushed into unexpanded_macros to be retried with module scope.
2. include! fails at the resolution step in collector:resolve_macros now that it's using module scope. Therefore, it's retained in unexpanded_macros.
3. Finally, collector:finish tries resolving the remaining unexpanded macros but only with module scope. include! again fails at the resolution step so a diagnostic is created.
**Root cause for missing macro-error diagnostic:**
1. In collector:resolve_macros, directive.legacy is None since eager expansion failed in collector:collect_macro_call. The macro_call_as_call_id fails to resolve since we're retrying in module scope. Therefore, collect_macro_expansion is not called for the macro and no macro-error diagnostic is generated.
**Fix:**
- In collector:collect_macro_call, do not add failing built-in macros to the unexpanded_macros list and immediately raise the macro-error diagnostic. This is in contrast to lazy macros which are resolved in collector::resolve_macros and later expanded in collect_macro_expansion where a macro-error diagnostic may be raised.
Co-authored-by: Brandon <brandondong604@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: brandondong <brandondong604@hotmail.com>
8037: Assist is empty 7709 r=Veykril a=chetankhilosiya
Updated the implementation to get the function from implementation
Co-authored-by: Chetan Khilosiya <chetan.khilosiya@gmail.com>
8020: Power up goto_implementation r=matklad a=Veykril
by allowing it to be invoked on references of names, now showing all (trait)
implementations of the given type in all crates instead of just the defining
crate as well as including support for builtin types
Example screenshot of `impl`s of Box in `log`, `alloc`, `std` and the current crate. Before you had to invoke it on the definition where it would only show the `impls` in `alloc`.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
8027: Completion context remove exact match method in favor of fields r=JoshMcguigan a=JoshMcguigan
This is a minor cleanup PR following #8008. It removes the `expected_name_and_type` method on completion context in favor of using the fields.
I thought this method was used in more places, or else it may have just made sense to make this change directly in #8008🤷
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
8008: Completion context expected type r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
Currently there are two ways completions use to determine the expected type. There is the `expected_type` field on the `CompletionContext`, as well as the `expected_name_and_type` method on the `RenderContext`. These two things returned slightly different results, and their results were only valid if you had pre-checked some (undocumented) invariants. A simple combination of the two approaches doesn't work because they are both too willing to go far up the syntax tree to find something that fits what they are looking for.
This PR makes the following changes:
1. Updates the algorithm that sets `expected_type` on `CompletionContext`
2. Adds `expected_name` field to `CompletionContext`
3. Re-writes the `expected_name_and_type` method to simply return the underlying fields from `CompletionContext` (I'd like to save actually removing this method for a follow up PR just to keep the scope of the changes down)
4. Adds unit tests for the `expected_type`/`expected_name` fields
All the existing unit tests still pass (unmodified), but this new algorithm certainly has some gaps (although I believe all the `FIXME` introduced in this PR are also flaws in the current code). I wanted to stop here and get some feedback though - is this approach fundamentally sound?
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
8018: Make Ty wrap TyKind in an Arc r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
... to further move towards Chalk.
This is a bit of a slowdown (218ginstr vs 213ginstr for inference on RA), even though it allows us to unwrap the Substs in `TyKind::Ref` etc..
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
