proposal for BTreeMap/Set min/max, #62924
- Which pair of names: #62924 lists the existing possibilities min/max, first/last, (EDIT) front/back, peek(/peek_back?). Iterators have next/next_back or next/last. I'm slightly in favour of first/last because min/max might suggest they search over the entire map, and front/back pretends they are only about position.
- Return key only instead of pair like iterator does?
- If not, then keep the _key_value suffix? ~~Also provide variant with mutable value? But there is no such variant for get_key_value.~~
- Look for and upgrade more usages of `.iter().next()` and such in the libraries? I only upgraded the ones I contributed myself, all very recently.
Add hooks for Miri panic unwinding
This commits adds in some additional hooks to allow Miri to properly
handle panic unwinding. None of this should have any impact on CTFE mode
This supports https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/693
Fix MIR lowering evaluation order and soundness bug
* Fixes a soundness issue with built-in index operations
* Ensures correct evaluation order of assignment expressions where the RHS is a FRU or is a use of a local of reference type.
* Removes an unnecessary symbol to string conversion
closes#65909closes#65910
The single dependency on queries (QueryName) can be fairly easily
abstracted via a trait and this further decouples Session from librustc
(the primary goal).
support issue = "none" in unstable attributes
This works towards fixing #41260.
This PR allows the use of `issue = "none"` in unstable attributes and makes changes to internally store the issue number as an `Option<NonZeroU32>`. For example:
```rust
#[unstable(feature = "unstable_test_feature", issue = "none")]
fn unstable_issue_none() {}
```
It was not made optional because feedback seen here #60860 suggested that people might forget the issue field if it was optional.
I could not remove the current uses of `issue = "0"` (of which there are a lot) because the stage 0 compiler expects the old syntax. Once this is available in the stage 0 compiler we can replace all uses of `"0"` with `"none"` and no longer allow `"0"`. This is my first time contributing, so I'm not sure what the protocol is with two-part things like this, so some guidance would be appreciated.
r? @varkor
