Remove `from` lang item
It was probably a leftover from the old `?` desugaring but anyways, it's unused now except for clippy, which can just use a diagnostics item.
statically guarantee that current error codes are documented
Closes#61137 (that's right!)
Pretty simple refactor (often just a change from `Result<Option<&str>>` to `Result<&str>`)
r? `@GuillaumeGomez` (could you specially look at 53044158eff0d64673a6100f701c57b484232aca? I believe you wrote that in the first place, just want to make sure you're happy with the change)
Fix `VecDeque::shrink_to` and add tests.
Fixes#108453.
Also adds both a specific test with the code from #108453 and an exhaustive test that checks all possible head positions, lengths and target capacities for deques with capacity 16.
cc `@trinity-1686a` `@scottmcm`
rustc_infer: Consolidate obligation elaboration de-duplication
# Explanation
The obligations `Elaborator` is doing de-duplication of obligations in 3 different locations. 1 off which has a comment.
This PR consolidates the functionality and comment to a single function.
Replace parse_[sth]_expr with parse_expr_[sth] function names
This resolves an inconsistency in naming style for functions on the parser, where:
* functions parsing specific kinds of items are named `parse_item_[sth]` and
* functions parsing specific kinds of *expressions* are named `parse_[sth]_expr`
favoring the style used by functions for items. There are multiple advantages of that style:
* functions of both categories are collected in the same place in the [rustdoc output](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_parse/parser/struct.Parser.html).
* it helps with autocompletion, as you can narrow down your search for a function to those about expressions.
* it mirrors rust's path syntax where less specific things come first, then it gets more specific, i.e. `std::collections::hash_map::Entry`.
The disadvantage is that it doesn't "read like a sentence" any more. But I think the advantages weigh more greatly.
This change was mostly application of this command:
```
sed -i -E 's/(fn |\.)parse_([[:alnum:]_]+)_expr/\1parse_expr_\2/' compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/*.rs
```
Plus very minor fixes outside of `rustc_parse`, and an invocation of `x fmt`.
Add `ErrorGuaranteed` to `hir::{Expr,Ty}Kind::Err` variants
First step in making the `Err` variants of `ExprKind` and `TyKind` require an `ErrorGuaranteed` during parsing. Making the corresponding AST versions require `ErrorGuaranteed` is a bit harder, whereas it was pretty easy to do this for HIR, so let's do that first.
The only weird thing about this PR is that `ErrorGuaranteed` is moved to `rustc_span`. This is *certainly* not the right place to put it, but `rustc_hir` cannot depend on `rustc_error` because the latter already depends on the former. Should I just pull out some of the error machinery from `rustc_error` into an even more minimal crate that `rustc_hir` can depend on? Advice would be appreciated.
Require `literal`s for some `(u)int_impl!` parameters
The point of these is to be seen *lexically* in the docs, so they should always be passed as the correct literal, not as an expression.
(Otherwise we could just compute `Min`/`Max` from `BITS`, for example.)
r? Nilstrieb
Treat `str` as containing `[u8]` for auto trait purposes
Wanted to gauge ``@rust-lang/lang`` and ``@rust-lang/types`` teams' thoughts on treating `str` as "containing" a `[u8]` slice for auto-trait purposes.
``@dtolnay`` brought this up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/13231#issuecomment-1399386472 as a blocker for future `str` type librarification, and I think it's both a valid concern and very easy to fix. I'm interested in actually doing that `str` type librarification (#107939), but this probably should be considered in the mean time regardless of that PR.
r? types for the impl, though this definitely needs an FCP.
This adds both a test specific to #108453 as well as an exhaustive test
that goes through all possible combinations of head index, length and target capacity
for a deque with capacity 16.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #107062 (Do some cleanup of doc/index.md)
- #107890 (Lint against `Iterator::map` receiving a callable that returns `()`)
- #108431 (Add regression test for #107918)
- #108432 (test: drop unused deps)
- #108436 (make "proc macro panicked" translatable)
- #108444 (docs/test: add UI test and docs for `E0476`)
- #108449 (Do not lint ineffective unstable trait impl for unresolved trait)
- #108456 (Complete migrating `ast_passes` to derive diagnostics)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
docs/test: add UI test and docs for `E0476`
Final undocumented error code. Not entirely sure about wording in the docs.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61137.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
cc ```@compiler-errors```
Do some cleanup of doc/index.md
I think a lot of people get to this landing page from `rustup doc`, and it's a bit tricky to find some useful information. I attempted to clean it up here a bit, from the commit message:
- Add quick link to API docs
- Add marker for external links, to help offline users
- Add information about using 'cargo doc' and the playground
- Clean up some of the wording
- Update body & header style to match rustdoc defaults
- Bump heading levels so main page header is 1, others are 2 (all were level 1 before)
Do not panic when analyzing the malformed origin of a format string
Fixes#10148. This will trigger only when generating format strings while accepting weird things in a procedural macro and setting the span to something which is not a string.
changelog: none
