resolve: Simplify treatment of ambiguity errors
If we have a glob conflict like this
```rust
mod m1 { struct S; }
mod m2 { struct S; }
use m1::*;
use m2::*;
```
we treat it as a special "ambiguity item" that's not an error by itself, but produces an error when actually used.
```rust
use m1::*; // primary
use m2::*; // secondary
=>
ambiguity S(m1::S, m2::S);
```
Ambiguity items were *sometimes* treated as their primary items for error recovery, but pretty irregularly.
After this PR they are always treated as their primary items, except that
- If an ambiguity item is marked as used, then it still produces an error.
- Ambiguity items are still filtered away when exported to other crates (which is also a use in some sense).
resolve: Fix one more ICE in import validation
So if you have an unresolved import
```rust
mod m {
use foo::bar;
}
```
error recovery will insert a special item with `Def::Err` definition into module `m`, so other things depending on `bar` won't produce extra errors.
The issue was that erroneous `bar` was overwriting legitimate `bar`s coming from globs, e.g.
```rust
mod m {
use baz::*; // imports real existing `bar`
use foo::bar;
}
```
causing some unwanted diagnostics talking about "unresolved items", and producing inconsistent resolutions like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57015.
This PR stops overwriting real successful resolutions with `Def::Err`s.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57015
resolve: Reduce some clutter in import ambiguity errors
Noticed in https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/a3pyrw/announcing_rust_131_and_rust_2018/eb8alhi/.
The first error is distracting, but unnecessary, it's a *consequence* of the ambiguity error and appears because one of the ambiguous `actix` modules (unsurprisingly) doesn't have the expected name in it.
resolve: Make "empty import canaries" invisible from other crates
Empty imports `use prefix::{};` are desugared into `use prefix::{self as _};` to make sure the prefix is checked for privacy/stability/etc.
This caused issues in cross-crate scenarios because gensyms are lost in crate metadata (the `_` is a gensym).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55811
I also added `// skip-codegen` to each one, to address potential concerns
that this change would otherwise slow down our test suite spending time
generating code for files that are really just meant to be checks of
compiler diagnostics.
(However, I will say: My preference is to not use `// skip-codegen` if
one can avoid it. We can use all the testing of how we drive LLVM that
we can get...)
(Updated post rebase.)
Before this two macros with same name would be indistinguishable inside a
`FileName`. This caused a bug in incremental compilation (see #53097) since
two different macros would map out to the same `StableFilemapId`.
Fixes#53097.
`fn resolve_legacy_scope` can now resolve only to `macro_rules!` items,
`fn resolve_lexical_macro_path_segment` is for everything else - modularized macros, preludes
