No longer parse it.
Remove AutoTrait variant from AST and HIR.
Remove backwards compatibility lint.
Remove coherence checks, they make no sense for the new syntax.
Remove from rustdoc.
`struct` pattern parsing and diagnostic tweaks
- Recover from struct parse error on match and point out missing match
body.
- Point at struct when finding non-identifier while parsing its fields.
- Add label to "expected identifier, found {}" error.
Fix#15980.
Use DefIndex encoding that works better with on-disk variable length integer representations.
Use the least instead of the most significant bit for representing the address space.
r? @eddyb
Fix 45345
There is a fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45345
It re-introduces `CFG_LIBDIR_RELATIVE` which was broken when migration from `configure` script to `x.py`.
Other commits fix errors which happen after rustbuild cleanups.
type error method suggestions use whitelisted identity-like conversions
Previously, on a type mismatch (and if this wasn't preëmpted by a
higher-priority suggestion), we would look for argumentless methods
returning the expected type, and list them in a `help` note. This had two
major shortcomings: firstly, a lot of the suggestions didn't really make
sense (if you used a &str where a String was expected,
`.to_ascii_uppercase()` is probably not the solution you were hoping
for). Secondly, we weren't generating suggestions from the most useful
traits! We address the first problem with an internal
`#[rustc_conversion_suggestion]` attribute meant to mark methods that keep
the "same value" in the relevant sense, just converting the type. We
address the second problem by making `FnCtxt.probe_for_return_type` pass
the `ProbeScope::AllTraits` to `probe_op`: this would seem to be safe
because grep reveals no other callers of `probe_for_return_type`.
Also, structured suggestions are pretty and good for RLS and friends.
Unfortunately, the trait probing is still not all one would hope for: at a
minimum, we don't know how to rule out `into()` in cases where it wouldn't
actually work, and we don't know how to rule in `.to_owned()` where it
would. Issues #46459 and #46460 have been filed and are ref'd in a FIXME.
This is hoped to resolve#42929, #44672, and #45777.
Fix examples of Duration::subsec_millis and Duration::subsec_micros
Update examples of `Duration::subsec_millis` and `Duration::subsec_micros`, because they are not for these two methods actually.
Fix docs for OsStr
At present, there are two small issues with the [docs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ffi/struct.OsStr.html) for std::ffi::OsStr:
- The docs say "OsStr is to OsString as String is to &str: the former in each pair are borrowed references; the latter are owned strings.". The latter pair is mixed up: String is the owned variant whereas &str is the borrowed reference.
- The doc links to String and &str are broken and render as [String] and [&str].
This PR fixes these issues.
Make libtest build on CloudABI.
Just like on UNIX systems, we need to use sysconf() to obtain the number
of CPUs. Extend the existing cfg()'s to match CloudABI as well.
Glued tokens can themselves be joint.
When gluing two tokens, the second of which is joint, the result should also be
joint.
This fixes an issue with joining three `Dot` tokens to make a `DotDotDot` - the
intermediate `DotDot` would not be joint and therefore we would not attempt to
glue the last `Dot` token, yielding `.. .` instead of `...`.
r? @jseyfried
Add -Ztime-passes line for dep-graph loading.
We measure how much time the background thread spends on loading the dep-graph but not how long the main thread is blocked while the background thread is still working. Let's change that!
Use the new fs_read_write functions in rustc internals
Uses `fs::read` and `fs::write` (added by #45837) where appropriate, to simplify code and dog-food these new APIs. This also improves performance, when combined with #47324.
Fix panic strings.
- Fix panic string in `check_ast_crate`.
- Update panic string for Duration subtraction on overflow/underflow.
Not sure if the changes to `Duration` are helpful/needed. Mostly just a nit.
Otherwise this is just a one character change :)
On another note: I hit the panic in `check_ast_crate` when compiling
[m-labs/smoltcp] with the following:
```
cargo test --doc --no-default-features --features "std socket-raw"`
```
[m-labs/smoltcp]: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp
Treat #[path] files as mod.rs files
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46936, cc @briansmith, @SergioBenitez, @nikomatsakis.
This (insta-stable) change treats files included via `#[path = "bla.rs"] mod foo;` as though they were `mod.rs` files. Namely, it allows them to include `mod` statements and looks for the child modules in sibling directories, rather than in relative `modname/childmodule.rs` files as happens for non-`mod.rs` files.
This change makes the `non_modrs_mods` feature backwards compatible with the existing usage in https://github.com/briansmith/ring, several versions of which are currently broken in beta. If we decide to merge, this change should be backported to beta.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37872
r? @jseyfried
Skip linker-output-non-utf8 test on Apple
This test fails on APFS filesystems with the following error:
```shell
mkdir: /Users/ryan/Code/rust/build/x86_64-apple-darwin/test/run-make/linker-output-non-utf8.stage2-x86_64-apple-darwin/zzz�: Illegal byte sequence
```
The mkdir does succeed on an HFS+ volume mounted on the same system:
```shell
$ mkdir zzz$$'\xff'
$ ls
zzz47432\xff
```
This is due to APFS now requiring that all paths are valid UTF-8. As APFS will be the default filesystem for all new Darwin-based systems the most straightforward fix is to skip this test on Darwin as well as Windows.
Update musl to 1.1.18
According to http://www.musl-libc.org/download.html:
This release corrects regressions in glob() and armv4t build failure
introduced in the previous release, and includes an important bug fix
for posix_spawnp in the presence of a large PATH environment variable.
Show only stderr diff when a ui test fails
Addresses #46826.
This PR will print the normalized output if expected text is empty otherwise it will just print the diff.
Should we also show a few (actual == expected) lines above & below when displaying the diff? What about indicating line numbers as well so one can quickly check mismatch lines in .stderr file?
Fix nested imports not included in the save_analysis output
This PR fixes#46823.
The bug was caused by the old access level checking code, which checked against the root UseTree even for nested trees. The problem with that is, for nested trees the root is lowered as an empty `ListStem`, which is not reachable by definition. The new code computes the access level with each tree's own ID, and with the root tree's visibility.
I tested this manually and it works, but I'm not really satisfied with that. I looked at the existing tests though, and no one checked for the save_analysis output as far as I can see. How should I proceed with that? I think having a test about this would be really nice.
rustfmt libarena/lib.rs
Note: it's my very first pull request. I'm trying to do something very simple to see how it works here, even if it's a tiny change or maybe it's not correct (sorry if it is the case).
r? @nrc
macros: improve 1.0/2.0 interaction
This PR supports using unhygienic macros from hygienic macros without breaking the latter's hygiene.
```rust
// crate A:
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! m1 { () => {
f(); // unhygienic: this macro needs `f` in its environment
fn g() {} // (1) unhygienic: `g` is usable outside the macro definition
} }
// crate B:
#![feature(decl_macro)]
extern crate A;
use A::m1;
macro m2() {
fn f() {} // (2)
m1!(); // After this PR, `f()` in the expansion resolves to (2), not (3)
g(); // After this PR, this resolves to `fn g() {}` from the above expansion.
// Today, it is a resolution error.
}
fn test() {
fn f() {} // (3)
m2!(); // Today, `m2!()` can see (3) even though it should be hygienic.
fn g() {} // Today, this conflicts with `fn g() {}` from the expansion, even though it should be hygienic.
}
```
Once this PR lands, you can make an existing unhygienic macro hygienic by wrapping it in a hygienic macro. There is an [example](b766fa887d) of this in the tests.
r? @nrc
Add iterator method specialisations to Range*
Add specialised implementations of `max` for `Range`, and `last`, `min` and `max` for `RangeInclusive`, all of which lead to significant advantages in the generated assembly on x86.
Note that adding specialisations of `min` and `last` for `Range` led to no benefit, and adding `sum` for `Range` and `RangeInclusive` led to type inference issues (though this is possibly still worthwhile considering the performance gain).
This addresses some of the concerns in #39975.
