When we have a resolution error when looking at a fully qualified path
on a type, look for all associated functions on inherent impls that
return `Self` and mention them to the user.
Fix#69512.
Stabilize `const_maybe_uninit_zeroed` and `const_mem_zeroed`
Make `MaybeUninit::zeroed` and `mem::zeroed` const stable. Newly stable API:
```rust
// core::mem
pub const unsafe fn zeroed<T>() ->;
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub const fn zeroed() -> MaybeUninit<T>;
}
```
This relies on features based around `const_mut_refs`. Per `@RalfJung,` this should be OK since we do not leak any `&mut` to the user.
For this to be possible, intrinsics `assert_zero_valid` and `assert_mem_uninitialized_valid` were made const stable.
Tracking issue: #91850
Zulip discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/.60const_mut_refs.60.20dependents
r? libs-api
`@rustbot` label -T-libs +T-libs-api +A-const-eval
cc `@RalfJung` `@oli-obk` `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Make sure that predicates with unmentioned bound vars are still considered global in the old solver
In the old solver, we consider predicates with late-bound vars to not be "global":
9c8a2694fa/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs (L1840-L1844)
The implementation of `has_late_bound_vars` was modified in #115834 so that we'd properly anonymize binders that had late-bound vars but didn't reference them. This fixed an ICE.
However, this also led to a behavioral change in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117056#issuecomment-1775014545 for a couple of crates, which now consider `for<'a> GL33: Shader` (note the binder var that is *not* used in the predicate) to not be "global". This forces associated types to not be normalizable due to the old trait solver being dumb.
This PR distinguishes types which *reference* late-bound vars and binders which *have* late-bound vars. The latter is represented with the new type flag `TypeFlags::HAS_BINDER_VARS`, which is used when we only care about knowing whether binders have vars in their bound var list (even if they're not used, like for binder anonymization).
This should fix (after beta backport) the `luminance-gl` and `luminance-webgl` crates in #117056.
r? types
**(priority is kinda high on a review here given beta becomes stable on November 16.)**
Hint optimizer about try-reserved capacity
This is #116568, but limited only to the less-common `try_reserve` functions to reduce bloat in debug binaries from debug info, while still addressing the main use-case #116570
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #110340 (Deref docs: expand and remove "smart pointer" qualifier)
- #116894 (Guarantee that `char` has the same size and alignment as `u32`)
- #117534 (clarify that the str invariant is a safety, not validity, invariant)
- #117562 (triagebot no-merges: exclude different case)
- #117570 (fallback for `construct_generic_bound_failure`)
- #117583 (Remove `'tcx` lifetime on `PlaceholderConst`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fallback for `construct_generic_bound_failure`
Fixes#117547
This case regressed at #115882.
In this context, `generic_param_scope` is produced by `RPITVisitor` and not included by `hir_owner`. Therefore, I've added a fallback to address this.
Make `core::mem::zeroed` const stable. Newly stable API:
// core::mem
pub const unsafe fn zeroed<T>() -> T;
This is stabilized with `const_maybe_uninit_zeroed` since it is a simple
wrapper.
In order to make this possible, intrinsics `assert_zero_valid` was made
const stable under `const_assert_type2`.
`assert_mem_uninitialized_valid` was also made const stable since it is
under the same gate.
Update the alignment checks to match rust-lang/reference#1387
Previously, we had a special case to not check `Rvalue::AddressOf` in this pass because we weren't quite sure if pointers needed to be aligned in the Place passed to it: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112026
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1387 merged, this PR updates this pass to match. The behavior of the check is nearly unchanged, except we also avoid inserting a check for creating references. Most of the changes in this PR are cleanup and new tests.
Cleanup `rustc_mir_build/../check_match.rs`
The file had become pretty unwieldy, with a fair amount of duplication. As a bonus, I discovered that we weren't running some pattern checks in if-let chains.
I recommend looking commit-by-commit. The last commit is a whim, I think it makes more sense that way but I don't hold this opinion strongly.
They've been deprecated for four years.
This commit includes the following changes.
- It eliminates the `rustc_plugin_impl` crate.
- It changes the language used for lints in
`compiler/rustc_driver_impl/src/lib.rs` and
`compiler/rustc_lint/src/context.rs`. External lints are now called
"loaded" lints, rather than "plugins" to avoid confusion with the old
plugins. This only has a tiny effect on the output of `-W help`.
- E0457 and E0498 are no longer used.
- E0463 is narrowed, now only relating to unfound crates, not plugins.
- The `plugin` feature was moved from "active" to "removed".
- It removes the entire plugins chapter from the unstable book.
- It removes quite a few tests, mostly all of those in
`tests/ui-fulldeps/plugin/`.
Closes#29597.
Fix incorrect trait bound restriction suggestion
Suggest
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait<T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait + <T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++++
```
Fix#117501.
Pretty print `Fn` traits in `rustc_on_unimplemented`
I don't think that users really ever should need to think about `Fn*` traits' tupled args for a simple trait error.
r? diagnostics
Add all RPITITs when augmenting param-env with GAT bounds in `check_type_bounds`
When checking that associated type definitions actually satisfy their associated type bounds in `check_type_bounds`, we construct a "`normalize_param_env`" which adds a projection predicate that allows us to assume that we can project the GAT to the definition we're checking. For example, in:
```rust
type Foo {
type Bar: Display = i32;
}
```
We would add `<Self as Foo>::Bar = i32` as a projection predicate when checking that `i32: Display` holds.
That `normalize_param_env` was, for some reason, only being used to normalize the predicate before it was registered. This is sketchy, because a nested obligation may require the GAT bound to hold, and also the projection cache is broken and doesn't differentiate projection cache keys that differ by param-envs 😿.
This `normalize_param_env` is also not sufficient when we have nested RPITITs and default trait methods, since we need to be able to assume we can normalize both the RPITIT and all of its child RPITITs to sufficiently prove all of its bounds. This is the cause of #117104, which only starts to fail for RPITITs that are nested 3 and above due to the projection-cache bug above.[^1]
## First fix
Use the `normalize_param_env` everywhere in `check_type_bounds`. This is reflected in a test I've constructed that fixes a GAT-only failure.
## Second fix
For RPITITs, install projection predicates for each RPITIT in the same function in `check_type_bounds`. This fixes#117104.
not sure who to request, so...
r? `@lcnr` hehe feel free to reassign :3
[^1]: The projection cache bug specifically occurs because we try normalizing the `assumed_wf_types` with the non-normalization param-env. This causes us to insert a projection cache entry that keeps the outermost RPITIT rigid, and it trivially satisifes all its own bounds. Super sketchy![^2]
[^2]: I haven't actually gone and fixed the projection cache bug because it's only marginally related, but I could, and it should no longer be triggered here.
Suggest
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait<T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait + <T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++++
```
Fix#117501.
Remove support for alias `-Z symbol-mangling-version`
(This is very similar to the removal of `-Z instrument-coverage` in #117111.)
`-C symbol-mangling-version` was stabilized back in rustc 1.59.0 (2022-02-24) via #90128, with the old unstable flag kept around (with a warning) as an alias to ease migration.
Clarify `Unsize` documentation
The documentation erroneously says that:
```rust
/// - Types implementing a trait `Trait` also implement `Unsize<dyn Trait>`.
/// - Structs `Foo<..., T, ...>` implement `Unsize<Foo<..., U, ...>>` if all of these conditions
/// are met:
/// - `T: Unsize<U>`.
/// - Only the last field of `Foo` has a type involving `T`.
/// - `Bar<T>: Unsize<Bar<U>>`, where `Bar<T>` stands for the actual type of that last field.
```
Specifically, `T: Unsize<U>` is not required to hold -- only the final field must implement `FinalField<T>: Unsize<FinalField<U>>`. This can be demonstrated by the test I added.
---
Second commit fleshes out the documentation a lot more.
Don't check for alias bounds in liveness when aliases have escaping bound vars
I actually have no idea how we *should* be treating aliases with escaping bound vars here... but the simplest behavior is just doing what we used to do before.
r? aliemjay
Fixes#117455
Account for `ref` and `mut` in the wrong place for pattern ident renaming
If the user writes `S { ref field: name }` instead of `S { field: ref name }`, we suggest the correct code.
Fix#72298.
Support enum variants in offset_of!
This MR implements support for navigating through enum variants in `offset_of!`, placing the enum variant name in the second argument to `offset_of!`. The RFC placed it in the first argument, but I think it interacts better with nested field access in the second, as you can then write things like
```rust
offset_of!(Type, field.Variant.field)
```
Alternatively, a syntactic distinction could be made between variants and fields (e.g. `field::Variant.field`) but I'm not convinced this would be helpful.
[RFC 3308 # Enum Support](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3308-offset_of.html#enum-support-offset_ofsomeenumstructvariant-field_on_variant)
Tracking Issue #106655.
Match usize/isize exhaustively with half-open ranges
The long-awaited finale to the saga of [exhaustiveness checking for integers](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50912)!
```rust
match 0usize {
0.. => {} // exhaustive!
}
match 0usize {
0..usize::MAX => {} // helpful error message!
}
```
Features:
- Half-open ranges behave as expected for `usize`/`isize`;
- Trying to use `0..usize::MAX` will tell you that `usize::MAX..` is missing and explain why. No more unhelpful "`_` is missing";
- Everything else stays the same.
This should unblock https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854.
Review-wise:
- I recommend looking commit-by-commit;
- This regresses perf because of the added complexity in `IntRange`; hopefully not too much;
- I measured each `#[inline]`, they all help a bit with the perf regression (tho I don't get why);
- I did not touch MIR building; I expect there's an easy PR there that would skip unnecessary comparisons when the range is half-open.
