Update `rand` in the stdlib tests, and remove the `getrandom` feature from it.
The main goal is actually removing `getrandom`, so that eventually we can allow running the stdlib test suite on tier3 targets which don't have `getrandom` support. Currently those targets can only run the subset of stdlib tests that exist in uitests, and (generally speaking), we prefer not to test libstd functionality in uitests, which came up recently in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104095 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104185. Additionally, the fact that we can't update `rand`/`getrandom` means we're stuck with the old set of tier3 targets, so can't test new ones.
~~Anyway, I haven't checked that this actually does allow use on tier3 targets (I think it does not, as some work is needed in stdlib submodules) but it moves us slightly closer to this, and seems to allow at least finally updating our `rand` dep, which definitely improves the status quo.~~ Checked and works now.
For the most part, our tests and benchmarks are fine using hard-coded seeds. A couple tests seem to fail with this (stuff manipulating the environment expecting no collisions, for example), or become pointless (all inputs to a function become equivalent). In these cases I've done a (gross) dance (ab)using `RandomState` and `Location::caller()` for some extra "entropy".
Trying to share that code seems *way* more painful than it's worth given that the duplication is a 7-line function, even if the lines are quite gross. (Keeping in mind that sharing it would require adding `rand` as a non-dev dep to std, and exposing a type from it publicly, all of which sounds truly awful, even if done behind a perma-unstable feature).
See also some previous attempts:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86963 (in particular https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86963#issuecomment-885438936 which explains why this is non-trivial)
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89131
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96626#issuecomment-1114562857 (I tried in that PR at the same time, but settled for just removing the usage of `thread_rng()` from the benchmarks, since that was the main goal).
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104185
- Probably more. It's very tempting of a thing to "just update".
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
rustdoc: remove no-op mobile CSS `.content { margin-left: 0 }`
This rule was added to override non-zero left margin on `.content`, which was removed in 135281ed15 and the margin-left was put on the docblock.
Point out span where we could introduce higher-ranked lifetime
Somewhat addresses #105422, but not really. We don't have that much useful information here since we're still in resolution :^(
Maybe this suggestion isn't worth it. If the reviewer has an idea how we can get a more succinct binder information for a structured suggestion, it would be appreciated.
Fix process-panic-after-fork.rs to pass on newer versions of Android.
The test process-panic-after-fork.rs was checking that abort() resulted in SIGSEGV on Android. This non-standard behavior was fixed back in 2013, so let's fix the test to also accept the standard behavior on Android.
Migrate `codegen_ssa` to diagnostics structs - [Part 3]
Completes migrating `codegen_ssa` module except 2 outstanding errors that depend on other crates:
1. [`rustc_middle::mir::interpret::InterpError`](b6097f2e1b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/error.rs (L475)): I saw `rustc_middle` is unassigned, I am open to take this work.
2. `codegen_llvm`'s use of `fn span_invalid_monomorphization_error`, which I started to replace in the [last commit](9a31b3cdda) of this PR, but would like to know the team's preference on how we should keep replacing the other macros:
2.1. Update macros to expect a `Diagnostic`
2.2. Remove macros and expand the code on each use.
See [some examples of the different options in this experimental commit](64aee83e80)
_Part 2 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103792_
r? ``@davidtwco``
Cc ``@compiler-errors``
Migrating rustc_infer to session diagnostics (part 3)
``@rustbot`` label +A-translation
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100717
Seems like a part of static_impl_trait.rs emits suggestions in a loop, and note.rs needs to have two instances of the same subdiagnostic, so these will need to wait until we have eager translation/list support.
Other than that, there is only error_reporting/mod.rs left to migrate.
Add help diag. for `const = Enum` missing braces around `Enum`
Previously it was not clear why this errored or if it was even supported, as there was no diagnostic that suggested wrapping it in braces.
Thus, add a simple diagnostic that suggests wrapping enum variants in braces.
Fixes#105927
rustdoc: remove no-op CSS `.rustdoc.source .sidebar { width: 0 }`
This CSS was added in dc2c972334, before 6a5f8b1aef when the sidebars were merged.
Now that they are merged, the source sidebar is being pushed off-screen anyway, so giving it zero width doesn't do much.
Handle non-existent upstream master branches in `x fmt`
People who do have a remote for `rust-lang/rust` but don't have the master branch checked out there used to get this error when running `x fmt`:
> fatal: ambiguous argument 'rust/master': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
> Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
> 'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
> rust/master
Which is not exactly helpful.
Now, we fall back to `origin/master` (hoping that at least that remote exists) for that case. If there is still some error, we just fall back to `x fmt .` and print a warning.
r? `@jyn514`
Add default and latest stable edition to --edition in rustc (attempt 2)
Fixes#106041
No longer leaks string like my first attempt PR, #106094 - uses LazyLock to construct a `&'static str`
It will now output the default edition and latest stable edition in the help message for the `--edition` flag.
Going to request the same reviewer as the first attempt for continuity - r? `@Nilstrieb`
Fix rustdoc source code rendering for `#[path = "../path/to/mod.rs"]` links
Fixes#103517
While generating the location for modules source HTML to be saved at, a `..` path component appeared to be translated to `/up/`.
Additionally, while generating the navigation sidebar, `..` path components were ignored. This means that (as in the issue above), a *real* directory structure of:
```
sys/
unix/
mod.rs <-- contains #![path = "../unix/mod.rs]
cmath.rs
```
was rendered as:
```
sys/
unix/
mod.rs
unix/
cmath.rs <-- links to sys/unix/unix/cmath.rs.html, 404
```
While the *files* were stored as
```
sys/
unix/
mod.rs.html
up/
unix/
cmath.rs.html
```
Improve include macro documentation
As outlined in #106118, the `include!` macro is a SEO problem when it comes to the Rust documentation. Beginners may see it as a replacement to `include` syntax in other languages. I feel like this documentation should quite explicitly link to the modules' documentation.
The primary goal of this PR is to address that issue by adding a warning to the documentation. While I was here, I also added some other parts. This included a `Uses` section and some (intra doc) links to other relevant topics.
I hope this can help beginners to Rust more quickly understand some multi-file project intricacies.
# References
- Syntax for the warning: 58accc6da3/tracing/src/lib.rs (L55)
refactor: clean up `errors.rs` and `error_codes_check.rs`
`errors.rs` is basically unused now, `error_codes_check.rs` is useful but not well commented, etc. It also doesn't check certain things which are certainly not correct. For example, `E0505` has a UI test in `src/test/ui/error-codes/` but that test actually outputs `E0504`?! Other issues like these exist. I've implemented these with "warnings" which are a bit rough around the edges but should be removed eventually.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez` (again not sure if you want to review but its relevant to you)
This CSS was added in dc2c972334,
before 6a5f8b1aef when the sidebars
were merged.
Now that they are merged, the source sidebar is being pushed
off-screen anyway, so giving it zero width doesn't do much.
