Rename `Ty::is_ty_infer` -> `Ty::is_ty_or_numeric_infer`
Makes sure people are aware that they may have a type variable *or* an int/float variable.
r? `@oli-obk` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106322#issuecomment-1376913539 but I could instead implement your solution, let me know.
(This will conflict with #106322 for now, ignore that 😄)
Render missing generics suggestion verbosely
It's a bit easier to read like this, especially ones that are appending new generics onto an existing list, like ": `, T`" which render somewhat poorly inline.
Also don't suggest `dyn` as a type parameter to add, even if technically that's valid in edition 2015.
Migrate `rustc_lint` lint diagnostics
Part 2 of [Migrate `rustc_lint` errors to `SessionDiagnostic`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100776)
r? `@davidtwco`
# TODO
- [x] Refactor some lints manually implementing `DecorateLint` to use `Option<Subdiagnostic>`.
- [x] Add `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` to lint functions in `context.rs`.
- [x] Migrate `hidden_unicode_codepoints.rs`.
- [x] Migrate `UnsafeCode` in `builtin.rs`.
- [x] Migrate the rest of `builtin.rs`.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #105795 (Stabilize `abi_efiapi` feature)
- #106446 ([LSDA] Take ttype_index into account when taking unwind action)
- #106675 (Mark ZST as FFI-safe if all its fields are PhantomData)
- #106740 (Adding a hint on iterator type errors)
- #106741 (Fix reexport of `doc(hidden)` item)
- #106759 (Revert "Make nested RPITIT inherit the parent opaque's generics.")
- #106772 (Re-add mw to review rotation)
- #106778 (Exclude formatting commit from blame)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Revert "Make nested RPITIT inherit the parent opaque's generics."
This reverts commit e2d41f4c97, and adjusts the `tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/nested-rpit.rs` test.
r? `@cjgillot`
fixes#106332, manually verified because it had no minimization :/
reopens#105197
cc #106729
Fix reexport of `doc(hidden)` item
Part of #59368.
It doesn't fix the `doc(inline)` nor the `doc(hidden)` on macro. I'll do it in a follow-up PR.
r? `@notriddle`
Mark ZST as FFI-safe if all its fields are PhantomData
This presents one possible solution to issue: #106629.
This is my first (tentative) contribution to the compiler itself.
I'm looking forward for comments and feedback
Closes: #106629
[LSDA] Take ttype_index into account when taking unwind action
If `cs_action != 0`, we should check the `ttype_index` field in action record. If `ttype_index == 0`, a clean up action is taken; otherwise catch action is taken.
This can fix unwind failure on AIX which uses LLVM's libunwind by default. IIUC, rust's LSDA is borrowed from c++ and I'm assuming itanium-cxx-abi https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/exceptions.pdf should be followed, so the fix follows what libcxxabi does. See ec48682ce9/libcxxabi/src/cxa_personality.cpp (L152) for use of `ttype_index`.
Don't pass `--sysroot` twice if SYSROOT is set
This is useful for rust-lang/rust to allow setting a sysroot that's *only* for build scripts, different from the regular sysroot passed in RUSTFLAGS (since cargo doesn't apply RUSTFLAGS to build scripts or proc-macros).
That said, the exact motivation is not particularly important: this fixes a regression from
5907e9155e (r1060215684).
Note that only RUSTFLAGS is tested in the new integration test; passing --sysroot through `clippy-driver` never worked as far as I can tell, and no one is using it, so I didn't fix it here.
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106394.
---
changelog: other: `SYSROOT` and `--sysroot` can now be set at the same time
[#10149](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10149)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Whne SYSROOT is defined, clippy-driver will insert a --sysroot argument
when calling rustc. However, when a sysroot argument is already defined,
e.g. through RUSTFLAGS=--sysroot=... the `cargo clippy` call would
error. This tests that the sysroot argument is only passed once and that
SYSROOT is ignored in this case.
This is useful for rust-lang/rust to allow setting a sysroot that's
*only* for build scripts, different from the regular sysroot passed in
RUSTFLAGS (since cargo doesn't apply RUSTFLAGS to build scripts or
proc-macros).
That said, the exact motivation is not particularly important: this
fixes a regression from
5907e9155e (r1060215684).
Note that only RUSTFLAGS is tested in the new integration test; passing
--sysroot through `clippy-driver` never worked as far as I can tell, and
no one is using it, so I didn't fix it here.
