Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101162 (Migrate rustc_resolve to use SessionDiagnostic, part # 1)
- #103386 (Don't allow `CoerceUnsized` into `dyn*` (except for trait upcasting))
- #103405 (Detect incorrect chaining of if and if let conditions and recover)
- #103594 (Fix non-associativity of `Instant` math on `aarch64-apple-darwin` targets)
- #104006 (Add variant_name function to `LangItem`)
- #104494 (Migrate GUI test to use functions)
- #104516 (rustdoc: clean up sidebar width CSS)
- #104550 (fix a typo)
Failed merges:
- #104554 (Use `ErrorGuaranteed::unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` less)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add variant_name function to `LangItem`
Clippy has an internal lint that checks for the usage of hardcoded def paths and suggests to replace them with a lang or diagnostic item, if possible. This was implemented with a hack, by getting all the variants of the `LangItem` enum and then index into it with the position of the `LangItem` in the `items` list. This is no longer possible, because the `items` list can't be accessed anymore.
Follow up to #103603
cc `@camsteffen`
r? `@oli-obk`
This is blocking the sync between Clippy and Rust. I'm not sure if this is the best solution here, or if I should add a method `items()` to `LanguageItems` and keep the code in Clippy unchanged.
Convert predicates into Predicate in the Obligation constructor
instead of having almost all callers do that.
This reduces a bit of boilerplate, and also paves the way for my work towards https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/531 (as it makes it easier to accept both goals and clauses where right now it only accepts predicates).
Clippy has an internal lint that checks for the usage of hardcoded def
paths and suggests to replace them with a lang or diagnostic item, if
possible. This was implemented with a hack, by getting all the variants
of the `LangItem` enum and then index into it with the position of the
`LangItem` in the `items` list. This is no longer possible, because the
`items` list can't be accessed anymore.
Record `LocalDefId` in HIR nodes instead of a side table
This is part of an attempt to remove the `HirId -> LocalDefId` table from HIR.
This attempt is a prerequisite to creation of `LocalDefId` after HIR lowering (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96840), by controlling how `def_id` information is accessed.
This first part adds the information to HIR nodes themselves instead of a table.
The second part is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103902
The third part will be to make `hir::Visitor::visit_fn` take a `LocalDefId` as last parameter.
The fourth part will be to completely remove the side table.
Use `token::Lit` in `ast::ExprKind::Lit`.
Instead of `ast::Lit`.
Literal lowering now happens at two different times. Expression literals are lowered when HIR is crated. Attribute literals are lowered during parsing.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Instead of `ast::Lit`.
Literal lowering now happens at two different times. Expression literals
are lowered when HIR is crated. Attribute literals are lowered during
parsing.
This commit changes the language very slightly. Some programs that used
to not compile now will compile. This is because some invalid literals
that are removed by `cfg` or attribute macros will no longer trigger
errors. See this comment for more details:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102944#issuecomment-1277476773
improve `filesearch::get_or_default_sysroot`
`fn get_or_default_sysroot` is now improved and used in `miri` and `clippy`, and tests are still passing as they should. So we no longer need to implement custom workarounds/hacks to find sysroot in tools like miri/clippy.
Resolves https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98832
re-opened from #103581
Track where diagnostics were created.
This implements the `-Ztrack-diagnostics` flag, which uses `#[track_caller]` to track where diagnostics are created. It is meant as a debugging tool much like `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`.
For example, the following code...
```rust
struct A;
struct B;
fn main(){
let _: A = B;
}
```
...now emits the following error message:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src\main.rs:5:16
|
5 | let _: A = B;
| - ^ expected struct `A`, found struct `B`
| |
| expected due to this
-Ztrack-diagnostics: created at compiler\rustc_infer\src\infer\error_reporting\mod.rs:2275:31
```
Accept `TyCtxt` instead of `TyCtxtAt` in `Ty::is_*` functions
Functions in answer:
- `Ty::is_freeze`
- `Ty::is_sized`
- `Ty::is_unpin`
- `Ty::is_copy_modulo_regions`
This allows to remove a lot of useless `.at(DUMMY_SP)`, making the code a bit nicer :3
r? `@compiler-errors`
spastorino noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so
those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of
`def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left
that alone.
privacy: Rename "accessibility levels" to "effective visibilities"
And a couple of other naming and comment tweaks.
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054
For `enum Level` I initially used naming `enum EffectiveVisibilityLevel`, but it was too long and inconvenient because it's used pretty often.
So I shortened it to just `Level`, if it needs to be used from some context where this name would be ambiguous, then it can be imported with renaming like `use rustc_middle::privacy::Level as EffVisLevel` or something.
update Miri
I had to use a hacked version of josh to create this, so let's be careful with merging this and maybe wait a bit to see if the josh issue becomes more clear. But the history looks good to me, we are not adding duplicates of rustc commits that were previously mirrored to Miri.
Also I want to add some cross-testing of Miri in x.py.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102287 (Elaborate supertrait bounds when triggering `unused_must_use` on `impl Trait`)
- #102922 (Filtering spans when emitting json)
- #103051 (translation: doc comments with derives, subdiagnostic-less enum variants, more derive use)
- #103111 (Account for hygiene in typo suggestions, and use them to point to shadowed names)
- #103260 (Fixup a few tests needing asm support)
- #103321 (rustdoc: improve appearance of source page navigation bar)
Failed merges:
- #103209 (Diagnostic derives: allow specifying multiple alternative suggestions)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Uplift `clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles` lint into rustc
This PR, as the title suggests, uplifts [`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`] lint into rustc. This lint warns for code like this:
```rust
for _ in Some(1) {}
for _ in Ok::<_, ()>(1) {}
```
i.e. directly iterating over `Option` and `Result` using `for` loop.
There are a number of suggestions that this PR adds (on top of what clippy suggested):
1. If the argument (? is there a better name for that expression) of a `for` loop is a `.next()` call, then we can suggest removing it (or rather replacing with `.by_ref()` to allow iterator being used later)
```rust
for _ in iter.next() {}
// turns into
for _ in iter.by_ref() {}
```
2. (otherwise) We can suggest using `while let`, this is useful for non-iterator, iterator-like things like [async] channels
```rust
for _ in rx.recv() {}
// turns into
while let Some(_) = rx.recv() {}
```
3. If the argument type is `Result<impl IntoIterator, _>` and the body has a `Result<_, _>` type, we can suggest using `?`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
for _ in f()? {}
```
4. To preserve the original behavior and clear intent, we can suggest using `if let`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
if let Some(_) = f() {}
```
(P.S. `Some` and `Ok` are interchangeable depending on the type)
I still feel that the lint wording/look is somewhat off, so I'll be happy to hear suggestions (on how to improve suggestions :D)!
Resolves#99272
[`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_loops_over_fallibles
rename `ImplItemKind::TyAlias` to `ImplItemKind::Type`
The naming of this variant seems inconsistent given that this is not really a "type alias", and the associated type variant for `TraitItemKind` is just called `Type`.
