Add macro_braces lint to check for irregular brace use in certain macros
The name is a bit long but this sounds good as `#[allow(unconventional_macro_braces)]` and it seems more clear that we are talking about the macro call not macro definitions, any feedback let me know. Thanks!
fixes#7278
changelog: Add ``[`unconventional_macro_braces`]`` lint that checks for uncommon brace usage with macros.
Rename unconventional -> nonstandard, add config field
Add standard_macro_braces fields so users can specify macro names and
brace combinations to lint for in the clippy.toml file.
Fix errors caused by nonstandard_macro_braces in other lint tests
Fix users ability to override the default nonstandard macro braces
Add type position macros impl `check_ty`
Add `needless_bitwise_bool` lint
fixes#6827fixes#1594
changelog: Add ``[`needless_bitwise_bool`]`` lint
Creates a new `bitwise_bool` lint to convert `x & y` to `x && y` when both `x` and `y` are booleans. I also had to adjust thh `needless_bool` lint slightly, and fix a couple failing dogfood tests. I made it a correctness lint as per flip1995's comment [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/3385#issuecomment-434715723), from a previous WIP attempt at this lint.
New lint: `unused_async`
changelog: Adds a lint, `unused_async`, which checks for async functions with no await statements
`unused_async` is a lint that reduces code smell and overhead by encouraging async functions to be refactored into synchronous functions.
Fixes#7176
### Examples
```rust
async fn get_random_number() -> i64 {
4 // Chosen by fair dice roll. Guaranteed to be random.
}
```
Could be written as:
```rust
fn get_random_number() -> i64 {
4 // Chosen by fair dice roll. Guaranteed to be random.
}
```
Something like this, however, should **not** be caught by clippy:
```rust
#[async_trait]
trait AsyncTrait {
async fn foo();
}
struct Bar;
#[async_trait]
impl AsyncTrait for Bar {
async fn foo() {
println!("bar");
}
}
```
The most recent changelog update 037ddf282b accompanying the 1.52 release added a second "Rust 1.52" section header, with the result that the Rust release announcement https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/05/06/Rust-1.52.0.html is linking to the "current beta" changelog section for Clippy rather than the stable changelog. I don't know the release process but based on previous changes to this file, I assume the correct thing to do is to mark the topmost section as being for Rust 1.53, not 1.52.
Add lint to check for boolean comparison in assert macro calls
This PR adds a lint to check if an assert macro is using a boolean as "comparison value". For example:
```rust
assert_eq!("a".is_empty(), false);
```
Could be rewritten as:
```rust
assert!(!"a".is_empty());
```
PS: The dev guidelines are amazing. Thanks a lot for writing them!
changelog: Add `bool_assert_comparison` lint
* Added expression check for shared_code_in_if_blocks
* Finishing touches for the shared_code_in_if_blocks lint
* Applying PR suggestions
* Update lints yay
* Moved test into subfolder
Lint: filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
Fixes#6061
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog:
* add new lint for filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
First Rust PR, so I'm sure I've violated some idioms. Happy to change anything.
I'm getting one test failure locally -- a stderr diff for `compile_test`. I'm having a hard time seeing how I could be causing it, so I'm tentatively opening this in the hopes that it's an artifact of my local setup against `rustc`. Hoping it can at least still be reviewed in the meantime.
I'm gathering that since this is a method lint, and `.filter(...).map(...)` is already checked, the means of implementation needs to be a little different, so I didn't exactly follow the setup boilerplate. My way of checking for method calls seems a little too direct (ie, "is the second element of the expression literally the path for `Option::is_some`?"), but it seems like that's how some other lints work, so I went with it. I'm assuming we're not concerned about, eg, closures that just end up equivalent to `Option::is_some` by eta reduction.
Add the from_str_radix_10 lint
changelog: added the new `from_str_radix_10` which sometimes replaces calls to `primitive::from_str_radix` to `str::parse`
This is ready to be merged, although maybe the category should be `pedantic` instead of `style`? I'm not sure where it fits better.
Closes#6713.
New lint: default_numeric_fallback
fixes#6064
r? `@flip1995`
As we discussed in [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Issue.20.236064/near/224647188) and [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Issue.20clippy.236064/near/224746333), I start implementing this lint from the strictest version.
In this PR, I'll allow the below two cases to pass the lint to reduce FPs.
1. Appearances of unsuffixed numeric literals in `Local` if `Local` has a type annotation, for example:
```rust
// Good.
let x: i32 = 1;
// Also good.
let x: (i32, i32) = if cond {
(1, 2)
} else {
(2, 3)
};
```
2. Appearances of unsuffixed numeric literals in args of `Call` or `MethodCall` if corresponding arguments of their signature have concrete types, for example:
```rust
fn foo_mono(x: i32) -> i32 {
x
}
fn foo_poly<T>(t: T) -> t {
t
}
// Good.
let x = foo_mono(13);
// Still bad.
let x: i32 = foo_poly(13);
```
changelog: Added restriction lint: `default_numeric_fallback`
Add new lint `filter_map_identity`
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only includes internal changes, you can just write
`changelog: none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR.
-->
This commit adds a new lint named filter_map_identity.
This lint is the same as `flat_map_identity` except that it checks for the usage of `filter_map`.
---
Closes#6643
changelog: Added a new lint: `filter_map_identity`
This commit adds a new lint named `filter_map_identity`. This lint is
the same as `flat_map_identity` except that it checks for `filter_map`.
Closes#6643
New Lint: Manual Flatten
This is a draft PR for [Issue 6564](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6564).
r? `@camsteffen`
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Add new lint [`manual_flatten`] to check for loops over a single `if let` expression with `Result` or `Option`.
New Lint: inspect_then_for_each
**Work In Progress**
This PR addresses [Issue 5209](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5209) and adds a new lint called `inspect_then_for_each`.
Current seek some guidance.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
---
changelog: Add [`inspect_for_each`] lint for the use of `inspect().for_each()` on `Iterators`.
New lint: vec_init_then_push
fixes: #1483
This will trigger on `new`, `default`, and `with_capacity` when the given capacity is less than or equal to the number of push calls. Is there anything else this should trigger on?
changelog: Added lint: `vec_init_then_push`
This splits up clippy::collapsible_if into collapsible_if for
if x {
if y { }
}
=>
if x && y { }
and collapsible_else_if for
if x {
} else {
if y { }
}
=>
if x {
} else if y {
}
so that we can lint for only the latter but not the first if we desire.
changelog: collapsible_if: split up linting for if x {} else { if y {} } into collapsible_else_if lint
Add lint print_stderr
Resolves#6348
Almost identical to print_stdout, this lint applies to the `eprintln!` and `eprint!` macros rather than `println!` and `print!`.
changelog: Add new lint [`print_stderr`]. [`println_empty_string`] and [`print_with_newline`] now apply to `eprint!()` and `eprintln!()` respectively.
Also fix review comments:
- Use const arrays and iterate them for the method/function names
- merge 2 if_chain's into one using a rest pattern
- remove unnecessary unsafe block in test
And make the lint only point to the count expression instead of the entire function call
run `cargo dev new_lint --category correctness --name suspicious_chained_operators --pass early`
add (currently failing) tests for suspicious_chained_operators
add some tests to answer a question that came up during implementation
write usage code for functions we'll need to find or create
Complete left-right tracking TODO
get it compiling with several `todo!` invocations.
refactor to a set of incomplete functions that don't expect to be able to edit a `Span`
create placeholder for `suggestion_with_swapped_ident` function and correct some comments
add `inside_larger_boolean_expression` test
fill out `get_ident` and `suggestion_with_swapped_ident`
Implementi the `IdentIter`
start on implementing the `IdentIter`
handle the `ExprKind::Path` case in `IdentIter`
on second thought, make the iterator type dynamic so we don't need an explicit type for each one we will need
handle `ExprKind::MacCall` in `IdentIter`
Try handling `box x` expressions
restructure `IdentIter`
set `self.done` when returning `None`
Handle `ExprKind::Array`
reduce duplication with a macro that we expect to use several more times
handle ExprKind::Call
add `new_p` convenience method
handle `MethodCall`
handle `Tup` and `Binary`
handle `Unary`
simplify by not returning an additional `Expr` from the `IdentIter`
add cross product test against false positives
rename suspicious_chained_operators to suspicious_operation_groupings within files
For the record, the exact commands run were:
find . -type f -name "*.md" -exec sed -i 's/suspicious_chained_operators/suspicious_operation_groupings/g' {} +
find . -type f -name "*.rs" -exec sed -i 's/suspicious_chained_operators/suspicious_operation_groupings/g' {} +
find . -type f -name "*.rs" -exec sed -i 's/SUSPICIOUS_CHAINED_OPERATORS/SUSPICIOUS_OPERATION_GROUPINGS/g' {} +
find . -type f -name "*.rs" -exec sed -i 's/SuspiciousChainedOperators/SuspiciousOperationGroupings/g' {} +
Also:
rename file to match module name
rename test file to match lint name
start implementing `IdentDifference` creation
add `IdentIter` utility
use `ident_iter::IdentIter`
fix bug in `suggestion_with_swapped_ident`
add `inside_if_statements` test
implement `Add` `todo`s
register `SuspiciousOperationGroupings` lint pass
fill in `chained_binops`, and fill in a stopgap version of `ident_difference_expr`, but then notice that the lint does not seem to ever be run in the tests
run `cargo dev update_lints` and not that the `suspicious_operation_groupings` lint still does not seem to be run
fix base index incrementing bug
fix paired_identifiers bug, and remove ident from `Single`
change help prefix and note our first successful lint messages!
add odd_number_of_pairs test
get the `non_boolean_operators` test passing, with two copies of the error message
extract `is_useless_with_eq_exprs` so we can know when `eq_op` will already handle something
add `not_caught_by_eq_op` tests since `s1.b * s1.b` was (reasonably) not caught by `eq_op`
cover the case where the change should be made on either side of the expression with `not_caught_by_eq_op` tests
produce the expected suggestion on the `not_caught_by_eq_op_middle_change_left` test
confirm that the previous tests still pass and update references
fix early continue bug and get `not_caught_by_eq_op_middle_change_right` passing
note that `not_caught_by_eq_op_start` already passes
fix bugs based on misunderstanding of what `Iterator::skip` does, and note that `not_caught_by_eq_op_end` now passes
add several parens tests and make some of them pass
handle parens inside `chained_binops_helper` and note that this makes several tests pass
get `inside_larger_boolean_expression_with_unsorted_ops` test passing by extracting out `check_same_op_binops` function
also run `cargo dev fmt`
note that `inside_function_call` already passes
add another `if_statement` test
remove the matching op requirement, making `inside_larger_boolean_expression_with_unsorted_ops` pass
prevent non-change suggestions from being emitted
get the `Nested` tests passing, and remove apparently false note about eq_op
add a test to justify comment in `ident_difference_expr_with_base_location` but find that the failure mode seems different than expected
complete `todo` making `do_not_give_bad_suggestions_for_this_unusual_expr` pass and add some more tests that already pass
add test to `eq_op`
note that `inside_fn_with_similar_expression` already passes
fix `inside_an_if_statement` and note that it already passes
attempt to implement if statement extraction and notice that we don't seem to handle unary ops correctly
add `maximum_unary_minus_right_tree` test and make it pass
add two tests and note one of them passes
filter out unary operations in several places, and find that the issue seems to be that we don't currently recognize the error in `multiple_comparison_types_and_unary_minus` even so.
remove filtering that was causing bad suggestions
remove tests that were deemed too much for now
run `cargo dev fmt`
correct eq_op post-merge
fill out the description and delete debugging code
run `cargo dev update_lints`
update eq_op references
add parens to work around rustfmt issue #3666 and run rustfmt
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/3666#issuecomment-714612257
update references after formatting
fix dogfood issues
fix multi-cursor edit
fix missed dogfood error
fix more dogfood pedantic issues, including function length
even more nesting
insert hidden definition of Vec3 so docs compile
add spaces to second struct def
reword test description comment
Co-authored-by: llogiq <bogusandre@gmail.com>
add local `use BinOpKind::*;`
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: llogiq <bogusandre@gmail.com>
switch `SUSPICIOUS_OPERATION_GROUPINGS` to a style lint
run `cargo dev update_lints`
put both usages of `op_types` in the same closure to satisfy `borrowck`
fix compile error
