In particular, I found that the disclaimer (promised in the second paragraph) doesn't stand out right now. I think the extra headers help with scanning this document, and making it easier to discern which steps are relevant to my particular flow through the options.
In particular, I found that the disclaimer (promised in the second paragraph) doesn't stand out right now. I think the extra headers help with scanning this document, and making it easier to discern which steps are relevant to my particular flow through the options.
I'm currently reading the rust book and this variable name tripped me up.
Because it was called "input", I thought at first it might contain the line
read by read_line(). This new variable name will be more instructive to rust
beginners.
Since the "Book" already avoids jQuery in its inline script tags and playpen.js is tiny, I figured I would convert it to plain old JS as well.
Side note: This is a separate issue, but another thing I noticed in my testing is that the "⇱" character doesn't display correctly in Chrome on Windows 7. (Firefox and IE work fine; other browsers not tested)
r? @steveklabnik
Edit: Github didn't like the "script" tag above
Edit 2: Actually, now IE seems to render "⇱" fine for me. Odd.
I'm surprised that bitwise operators `&`, `|` and `^` are implemented for `bool` arguments, because inspection of boolean's bits is not something that should be encouraged and because `&&` -> `&` is a common typo, but if they are implemented, then their behavior should be documented.
The "unit value" is a value of the "unit type," not the "unit value type." Regardless of correctness, this straight syntax is easier to grok.
Part of #16676
Sorry if something's off here, it's my first pull request to rust!
Use result of the computation to prevent the compiler from optimising
too much. Change `_x` to `x` and therefore remove the paragraph about
the underscore.
Fixes#25855.
r? @steveklabnik
Use result of the computation to prevent the compiler from optimising
too much. Change `_x` to `x` and therefore remove the paragraph about
the underscore.
Fixes#25855.
Explain the --bin flag in terms of the difference
between shipping binary and library code
I'm not sure if my explanation is even quite correct, but as a newbie coming from Ruby, this is my best guess. (In Rubyland, libraries always ship with the source code because there's no other form you can ship. :) )
In the discussion of returning closures, it seems like the example code got simplified, but only the later copies got fixed. The final working code has `factory` returning `|x| x + num`, but the earlier code has `|x| vec.push(x)`.
The first form seemed to have more distracting characteristics, and the code wasn't right anyway, so I changed them to all use the second form, and updated the error messages.
r? @steveklabnik
Doc patch for #26120. Extra words here, because "value" is repeated.
I haven't read about whether/how it should go to stable (sorry), but I think it would help newcomers.
Thanks,
