`question_mark` don't lint on `if let Err` with `else`
cc #9518
AFAICT the only time this would be a valid suggestion is the rather esoteric
```rust
let _ = if let Err(e) = x {
return Err(e);
} else {
// no side effects
x.unwrap()
}
```
which doesn't seem worth checking to me. Please correct me if I'm missing something.
changelog: [`question_mark`] don't lint on `if let Err` with `else`
move `UNINLINED_FORMAT_ARGS` to pedantic
As discussed in zulip, we are moving this lint to pedantic to be backported
changelog: [`UNINLINED_FORMAT_ARGS`]: move to pedantic
Fix `needless_borrow` false positive
The PR fixes the false positive exposed by `@BusyJay's` example in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9111#issuecomment-1277114280
The current approach is described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9674#issuecomment-1289294201 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9674#issuecomment-1292225232.
The original approach appears below.
---
The proposed fix is to flag only "simple" trait implementations involving references, a concept
that I introduce next.
Intuitively, a trait implementation is "simple" if all it does is dereference and apply the trait
implementation of a type named by a type parameter. `AsRef` provides a good example of a simple
implementation: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.AsRef.html#impl-AsRef%3CU%3E-for-%26T
We can make this idea more precise as follows. Given a trait implementation, first determine
whether the implementation is "used defined." If so, then examine its nested obligations.
Consider the implementation simple if-and-only-if:
- there is at least one nested obligation for the same trait
- for each type `X` in the nested obligation's substitution, either `X` is the same as that of
the original obligation's substitution, or the original type is `&X`
For example, the following implementation from `@BusyJay's` example is "complex" (i.e., not simple)
because it produces no nested obligations:
```rust
impl<'a> Extend<&'a u8> for A { ... }
```
On the other hand, the following slightly modified implementation is simple, because it produces
a nested obligation for `Extend<X>`:
```rust
impl<'a, X> Extend<&'a X> for A where A: Extend<X> { ... }
```
How does flagging only simple implementations help? One way of interpreting the false positive in
`@BusyJay's` example is that it separates a reference from a concrete type. Doing so turns a
successful type inference into a failing one. By flagging only simple implementations, we
separate references from type variables only, thereby eliminating this class of false positives.
Note that `Deref` is a special case, as the obligations generated for it already involve the
underlying type.
r? `@Jarcho` (Sorry to keep pinging you with `needless_borrow` stuff. But my impression is no one knows this code better than you.)
changelog: fix `needless_borrow` false positive
Previously the following wrong suggestion was given
```rust
impl Error for std::fmt::Error {
fn custom<T: std::fmt::Display>(_msg: T) -> Self {
- std::fmt::Error // Should lint
+ Self::Error // Should lint
}
}
```
Also remove known problem line related to #4140 since it's been closed, and refactor the lint
Remove `lib.register_*` and `src/docs*` in `cargo dev update_lints`
Follow up to #9709 / #9541
There's a good number of PRs with some leftover `src/docs` files for example, and as a reviewer it's something we're used to ignoring so it can easily slip through
r? `@flip1995`
changelog: none
update Miri
I had to use a hacked version of josh to create this, so let's be careful with merging this and maybe wait a bit to see if the josh issue becomes more clear. But the history looks good to me, we are not adding duplicates of rustc commits that were previously mirrored to Miri.
Also I want to add some cross-testing of Miri in x.py.
Track `clippy.toml` and `Cargo.toml` in `file_depinfo`
Causes cargo to re-run clippy when those paths are modified
Also tracks the path to `clippy-driver` in debug mode to remove the workarounds in `cargo dev lint` and `lintcheck` (cc `@matthiaskrgr)`
changelog: Automatically re-run Clippy if `Cargo.toml` or `clippy.toml` are modified
Fixes#2130Fixes#8512
r? `@flip1995`
Causes cargo to re-run clippy when those paths are modified
Also tracks the path to `clippy-driver` in debug mode to remove the
workarounds in `cargo dev lint` and `lintcheck`
make ignored internally mutable types for `mutable-key` configurable
We had some false positives where people would create their own types that had interior mutability unrelated to hash/eq. This addition lets you configure this as e.g. `arc-like-types=["bytes::Bytes"]`
This fixes#5325 by allowing users to specify the types whose innards like `Arc` should be ignored (the generic types are still checked) for the sake of detecting inner mutability.
r? `@Alexendoo`
---
changelog: Allow configuring types to ignore internal mutability in `mutable-key`
Update `from_raw_with_void_ptr` to support types other than `Box`
This PR updates the `from_raw_with_void_ptr` lint, which covered
`Box::from_raw`, to also cover the `from_raw` static method of the
`Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
It also improves the description and error messages of this lint.
---
changelog: [`from_raw_with_void_ptr`]: Now works with the `Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
add new lint `seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind `
changelog: `seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind`: new lint to suggest using `rewind` instead of `seek` to start
Resolve#8600
We had some false positives where people would create their own types
that had interior mutability unrelated to hash/eq. This addition lets
you configure this as e.g. `arc-like-types=["bytes::Bytes"]`
Add lint to tell about let else pattern
Adds a lint to tell the user if the let_else pattern should be used.
~~The PR is blocked probably on rustfmt support, as clippy shouldn't suggest features that aren't yet fully supported by all tools.~~ Edit: I guess adding it as a restriction lint for now is the best option, it can be turned into a style lint later.
---
changelog: addition of a new lint to check for manual `let else`
Sometimes type annotations are needed for type inferrence to work,
or because of coercions. We don't know this, and we also don't
want users to possibly repeat the entire pattern.
