This makes sure that the tests in clippy_utils are run in CI.
When looking into this I discovered that two tests were failing and
multiple doc tests were failing. This fixes those tests and enables a
few more doc tests.
Remove `SymbolStr`
This was originally proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74554#discussion_r466203544. As well as removing the icky `SymbolStr` type, it allows the removal of a lot of `&` and `*` occurrences.
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
r? `@oli-obk`
Implement let-else type annotations natively
Tracking issue: #87335Fixes#89688, fixes#89807, edit: fixes #89960 as well
As explained in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89688#issuecomment-940405082, the previous desugaring moved the let-else scrutinee into a dummy variable, which meant if you wanted to refer to it again in the else block, it had moved.
This introduces a new hir type, ~~`hir::LetExpr`~~ `hir::Let`, which takes over all the fields of `hir::ExprKind::Let(...)` and adds an optional type annotation. The `hir::Let` is then treated like a `hir::Local` when type checking a function body, specifically:
* `GatherLocalsVisitor` overrides a new `Visitor::visit_let_expr` and does pretty much exactly what it does for `visit_local`, assigning a local type to the `hir::Let` ~~(they could be deduplicated but they are right next to each other, so at least we know they're the same)~~
* It reuses the code in `check_decl_local` to typecheck the `hir::Let`, simply returning 'bool' for the expression type after doing that.
* ~~`FnCtxt::check_expr_let` passes this local type in to `demand_scrutinee_type`, and then imitates check_decl_local's pattern checking~~
* ~~`demand_scrutinee_type` (the blindest change for me, please give this extra scrutiny) uses this local type instead of of creating a new one~~
* ~~Just realised the `check_expr_with_needs` was passing NoExpectation further down, need to pass the type there too. And apparently this Expectation API already exists.~~
Some other misc notes:
* ~~Is the clippy code supposed to be autoformatted? I tried not to give huge diffs but maybe some rustfmt changes simply haven't hit it yet.~~
* in `rustc_ast_lowering/src/block.rs`, I noticed some existing `self.alias_attrs()` calls in `LoweringContext::lower_stmts` seem to be copying attributes from the lowered locals/etc to the statements. Is that right? I'm new at this, I don't know.
By changing `as_str()` to take `&self` instead of `self`, we can just
return `&str`. We're still lying about lifetimes, but it's a smaller lie
than before, where `SymbolStr` contained a (fake) `&'static str`!
Stabilize `iter::zip`
Hello all!
As the tracking issue (#83574) for `iter::zip` completed the final commenting period without any concerns being raised, I hereby submit this stabilization PR on the issue.
As the pull request that introduced the feature (#82917) states, the `iter::zip` function is a shorter way to zip two iterators. As it's generally a quality-of-life/ergonomic improvement, it has been integrated into the codebase without any trouble, and has been
used in many places across the rust compiler and standard library since March without any issues.
For more details, I would refer to `@cuviper's` original PR, or the [function's documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/fn.zip.html).
fix clippy format using `cargo fmt -p clippy_{lints,utils}`
manually revert rustfmt line truncations
rename to hir::Let in clippy
Undo the shadowing of various `expr` variables after renaming `scrutinee`
reduce destructuring of hir::Let to avoid `expr` collisions
cargo fmt -p clippy_{lints,utils}
bless new clippy::author output
Add new lint to warn when #[must_use] attribute should be used on a method
This lint is somewhat similar to https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#must_use_candidate but also different: it emits a warning by default and only targets methods (so not functions nor associated functions).
Someone suggested it to me after this tweet: https://twitter.com/m_ou_se/status/1466439813230477312
I think it would reduce the number of cases of API misuses quite a lot.
What do you think?
---
changelog: Added new [`return_self_not_must_use`] lint
Fix `any()` not taking reference in `search_is_some` lint
`find` gives reference to the item, but `any` does not, so suggestion is broken in some specific cases.
Fixes: #7392
changelog: [`search_is_some`] Fix suggestion for `any()` not taking item by reference
Improve `strlen_on_c_string`
fixes: #7436
changelog: lint `strlen_on_c_string` when used without a fully-qualified path
changelog: suggest removing the surrounding unsafe block for `strlen_on_c_string` when possible
Support suggestion for #7854
I think the detection of parking_lot's mutex and rwlock is valuable, so submit this pr, please help judge and review, thank you.
Make let_underscore_lock support parking_lot.(Fixes#7854)
changelog: Make let_underscore_lock support parking_lot
I think the detection of parking_lot's mutex and rwlock is valuable, so submit this pr, please help judge and review, thank you.
Make let_underscore_lock support parking_lot.
changelog: Make let_underscore_lock support parking_lot
Lint for bool to integer casts in `cast_lossless`
The lint description says
> Checks for casts between *numerical* types that may be replaced by safe conversion functions.
Which is strictly speaking being violated here, but it seems within the spirit of the lint. I think it is still a useful lint to have, and having a different lint for just this feels excessive. Thoughts?
Fixes#7947
changelog: Lint for bool to integer casts in [`cast_lossless`]
* Finding pattern slices for `avoidable_slice_indexing`
* `avoidable_slice_indexing` analysing slice usage
* Add configuration to `avoidable_slice_indexing`
* Emitting `avoidable_slice_indexing` with suggestions
* Dogfooding and fixing bugs
* Add ui-toml test for `avoidable_slice_indexing`
* Correctly suggest `ref` keywords for `avoidable_slice_indexing`
* Test and document `mut` for `avoid_slice_indexing`
* Handle macros with `avoidable_slice_indexing` lint
* Ignore slices with sub patterns in `avoidable_slice_indexing`
* Update lint description for `avoidable_slice_indexing`
* Move `avoidable_slice_indexing` to nursery
* Added more tests for `avoidable_slice_indexing`
* Update documentation and message for `avoidable_slice_indexing`
* Teach `avoidable_slice_indexing` about `HirId`s and `Visitors`
* Rename lint to `index_refutable_slice` and connected config
Add Clippy version to Clippy's lint list
Hey, hey, the semester is finally over, and I wanted to get back into hacking on Clippy. It has also been some time since our metadata collection monster has been feed. So, this PR adds a new attribute `clippy::version` to document which version a lint was stabilized. I considered using `git blame` but that would be very hacky and probably not accurate.
I'm also thinking that this attribute can be used to have a `clippy::nightly` lint group which is allow-by-default that delays setting the actual lint group until the defined version is reached. Just something to consider regarding #6623🙃
This PR only adds the version to 4 lints to keep it reviewable. I'll do a followup PR to add the version to other lints if the implementation is accepted 🙃
Also, mobile approved xD
---
r? `@flip1995`
cc: #7172closes: #6492
changelog: [Clippy's lint list](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html) now displays the version a lint was added. 🎉
---
Example lint declaration after this update:
```rs
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// [...]
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// // Bad
/// let x = 3.14;
/// // Good
/// let x = std::f32::consts::PI;
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub APPROX_CONSTANT,
correctness,
"the approximate of a known float constant (in `std::fXX::consts`)"
}
```
This commit adds a `no_std` and `no_core` check on `swap` lint and additionally suggest `core::mem::swap` whenever possible.
Remove warning if both `std` and `core` is not present.
Don't destructure args tuple in format_args!
This allows Clippy to parse the HIR more simply since `arg0` is changed to `_args.0`. (cc rust-lang/rust-clippy#7843). From rustc's perspective, I think this is something between a lateral move and a tiny improvement since there are fewer bindings.
r? `@m-ou-se`
