Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt tests.
This PR makes compiletest run LLVM `FileCheck` tool on mir-opt tests.
The check is *run by default*, except if disabled using `// skip-filecheck` comment. This ensures that we do not have a silently broken test. For now, the check is only run on the output of `--emit=mir`, ie. on PreCodegen MIR.
I give an example on `reference_prop.rs`.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@RalfJung`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85180
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116650 (add some comments and some cleanup around Miri intptrcast)
- #116896 (Only check in a single place if a pass is enabled.)
- #116906 (Use v0.0.0 in compiler crates)
- #116921 (fix(bootstrap) info message show correct path now)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Use v0.0.0 in compiler crates
I may be totally off base here, but my understanding is that it's conventional to use v0.0.0 to reflect the unversioned nature of the compiler crates. Fix that for some of the compiler crates that were created recently.
Make TCP connect handle EINTR correctly
According to the [POSIX](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/connect.html) standard, if connect() is interrupted by a signal that is caught while blocked waiting to establish a connection, connect() shall fail and set errno to EINTR, but the connection request shall not be aborted, and the connection shall be established asynchronously. When the connection has been established asynchronously, select() and poll() shall indicate that the file descriptor for the socket is ready for writing.
The previous implementation differs from the recomendation: in a case of the EINTR we tried to reconnect in a loop and sometimes get EISCONN error (this problem was originally detected on MacOS).
1. More details about the problem in an [article](http://www.madore.org/~david/computers/connect-intr.html).
2. The original [issue](https://git.picodata.io/picodata/picodata/tarantool-module/-/issues/157).
Add `-Zstack-protector` test for Windows targets
Add variants of the `stack-protector-heuristics-effect.rs` test for 32-bit and 64-bit MSVC Windows and update the original test to run on GNU Windows targets.
I added two tests instead of trying to modify the original because:
- MSVC uses a different function name (`__security_check_cookie` to perform the test rather than doing the test inline and calling `__stack_chk_fail`).
- LLVM's stack protection pass doesn't currently support generating checks for [frames with funclet based EH personality](37fd3c96b9/llvm/lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp (L103C1-L109C4)).
- 32-bit Windows uses classic EH while 64-bit Windows uses table-based EH which results in slightly different codegen.
[CI run with test passing on {i686,x86_64}-{msvc,mingw}](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/6275450644/job/17042958375?pr=116037)
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116663 (Don't ICE when encountering unresolved regions in `fully_resolve`)
- #116761 (Fix podman detection in CI scripts)
- #116795 (Add `#[track_caller]` to `Option::unwrap_or_else`)
- #116829 (Make `#[repr(Rust)]` incompatible with other (non-modifier) representation hints like `C` and `simd`)
- #116883 (Change my name in mailmap)
- #116908 (Tweak wording of type errors involving type params)
- #116912 (Some renaming nits for `rustc_type_ir`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Change my name in mailmap
I changed some things about my distro (my GPG key, along with the git username). This PR sets my committer name as `blyxyas` for those commits so that it is the same as my reviewer name in `thanks`.
Fix podman detection in CI scripts
When docker-podman compat was set up in a way that causes "docker" to be the argv[0] of podman, the previous detection did not work. This was for example the case in the compat package from nixpkgs.
This checks the output and should work everywhere.
I tested it locally by executing
```sh
if [[ "$id" != 0 && "$(docker version)" =~ Podman ]]; then
echo yes
else
echo no
fi
```
which printed `no` before, and `yes` now.
fixes#113129
r? cuviper
Don't ICE when encountering unresolved regions in `fully_resolve`
We can encounter unresolved regions due to unconstrained impl lifetime arguments because `collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys` runs before WF actually checks that the impl is well-formed.
Fixes#116525
Panic when the global allocator tries to register a TLS destructor
Using a `RefCell` avoids the undefined behaviour encountered in #116390 and reduces the amount of `unsafe` code in the codebase.
Bump `COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE` to deny + warn in deps
1.73 is the first place this shows up in stable (recall that there was only 1 regression), so let's bump this to deny on nightly.
r? lcnr
coverage: Move most per-function coverage info into `mir::Body`
Currently, all of the coverage information collected by the `InstrumentCoverage` pass is smuggled through MIR in the form of individual `StatementKind::Coverage` statements, which must then be reassembled by coverage codegen.
That's awkward for a number of reasons:
- While some of the coverage statements do care about their specific position in the MIR control-flow graph, many of them don't, and are just tacked onto the function's first BB as metadata carriers.
- MIR inlining can result in coverage statements being duplicated, so coverage codegen has to jump through hoops to avoid emitting duplicate mappings.
- MIR optimizations that would delete coverage statements need to carefully copy them into the function's first BB so as not to omit them from coverage reports.
- The order in which coverage codegen sees coverage statements is dependent on MIR optimizations/inlining, which can cause unnecessary churn in the emitted coverage mappings.
- We don't have a good way to annotate MIR-level functions with extra coverage info that doesn't belong in a statement.
---
This PR therefore takes most of the per-function coverage info and stores it in a field in `mir::Body` as `Option<Box<FunctionCoverageInfo>>`.
(This adds one pointer to the size of `mir::Body`, even when coverage is not enabled.)
Coverage statements still need to be injected into MIR in some cases, but only when they actually affect codegen (counters) or are needed to detect code that has been optimized away as unreachable (counters/expressions).
---
By the end of this PR, the information stored in `FunctionCoverageInfo` is:
- A hash of the function's source code (needed by LLVM's coverage map format)
- The number of coverage counters added by coverage instrumentation
- A table of coverage expressions, associating each expression ID with its operator (add or subtract) and its two operands
- The list of mappings, associating each covered code region with a counter/expression/zero value
---
~~This is built on top of #115301, so I'll rebase and roll a reviewer once that lands.~~
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
