Run name-anon-globals after LTO passes as well
If we're going to emit bitcode (through ThinLTOBuffer), then we need to ensure that anon globals are named. This was already done after optimization passes, but also has to happen after LTO passes, as we always emit the final result in a ThinLTO-compatible manner.
I added the test as `run-make`. The important bit is that we emit bitcode in some way (e.g. `--crate-type rlib` or `--emit=llvm-bc`). Please tell me if there is a better way to test for that.
Fixes#51947
Make `process_obligations`' computation of `completed` optional.
It's only used in tests.
This reduces instruction counts on several benchmarks by 0.5--1%.
Don't print opt fuel messages to stdout because it breaks Rustbuild
Rustbuild passes `--message-format json` to the compiler invocations
which causes JSON to be emitted on stdout. Printing optimization fuel
messages to stdout breaks the json and causes Rustbuild to fail.
Work around this by emitting optimization fuel related messages on
stderr instead.
Choose predicates without inference variables over those with them
Fixes#54705
When constructing synthetic auto trait impls, we may come across
multiple predicates involving the same type, trait, and substitutions.
Since we can only display one of these, we pick the one with the 'most
strict' lifetime paramters. This ensures that the impl we render the
user is actually valid (that is, a struct matching that impl will
actually implement the auto trait in question).
This commit exapnds the definition of 'more strict' to take into account
inference variables. We always choose a predicate without inference
variables over a predicate with inference variables.
[CI] Run a `thumbv7m-none-eabi` binary using `qemu-system-arm` [IRR-2018-embedded]
## What's included?
- Run a `thumbv7m-none-eabi` binary using `qemu-system-arm`
- We are using `cortex-m-rt = "=0.5.4"` which does not use `proc_macro`.
(reason: stage2 build of rustc does not work well with `proc_macro` in `run-make` phase.)
- We are using GNU LD for now.
## Blocker
All resolved.
- ~[Waiting] `#[panic_handler]` is not available in stable.~
- [Merged] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53619
- ~[Waiting] https://github.com/japaric/lm3s6965evb: does not compile on stable.~
- [OK] dependent crate ~`panic-abort`~ `panic-halt`: already moved to use `#[panic_handler]`.
## Update
`#[panic_handler]` will be stabilized in Rust 1.30.
CC @kennytm @jamesmunns @nerdyvaishali
If we're going to emit bitcode (through ThinLTOBuffer), then we
need to ensure that anon globals are named. This was already done
after optimization passes, but also has to happen after LTO passes,
as we always emit the final result in a ThinLTO-compatible manner.
Fixes#51947.
NLL Diagnostic Review 3: Missing errors for borrows of union fields
Fixes#55675.
This PR modifies a test to make it more robust (it also fixes indentation on a doc comment, but that's not the point of the PR). See the linked issue for details.
r? @pnkfelix
Fix tracking issue numbers for some unstable features
And also remove deprecated unstable `#[panic_implementation]` attribute that was superseded by stable `#[panic_handler]` and doesn't have an open tracking issue.
std: Enable usage of `thread_local!` through imports
The `thread_local!` macro delegated to an internal macro but it didn't
do so in a macros-and-the-module-system compatible fashion, meaning if a
`#![no_std]` crate imported `std` and tried to use `thread_local!` it
would fail due to missing a lookup of an internal macro.
This commit switches the macro to instead use `$crate` to invoke other
macros, ensuring that it'll work when `thread_local!` is imported alone.
std: Improve codegen size of accessing TLS
Some code in the TLS implementation in libstd stores `Some(val)` into an
`&mut Option<T>` (effectively) and then pulls out `&T`, but it currently
uses `.unwrap()` which can codegen into a panic even though it can never
panic. With sufficient optimizations enabled (like LTO) the compiler can
see through this but this commit helps it along in normal mode
(`--release` with Cargo by default) to avoid codegen'ing the panic path.
This ends up improving the optimized codegen on wasm by ensuring that a
call to panic pulling in more file size doesn't stick around.
Use lld directly for Fuchsia target
Fuchsia already uses lld as the default linker, so there's no reason
to always invoke it through Clang, instead we can simply invoke lld
directly and pass the set of flags that matches Clang.
Fuchsia already uses lld as the default linker, so there's no reason
to always invoke it through Clang, instead we can simply invoke lld
directly and pass the set of flags that matches Clang.
NLL has increased precision in its analysis of drop order, and we want
the test annotations to deliberately reflect this by having fewer
ERROR annotations for NLL than for AST-borrowck. The best way to get
this effect is via `// revisions`.
As a drive-by, also added uses of all the borrows just to make it
clear that NLL isn't somehow sidestepping things by using shorter
borrows than you might have otherwise expected. (Of course, the added
uses do not make all that much difference since the relevant types all
declare `impl Drop` and thus those drops have implicit uses anyway.)
This is a variant of `ui/borrowck/borrowck-closures-mut-of-imm.rs`
that I used to help identify what changes I needed to make to the
latter file in order to recover its instances of E0524 under NLL.
(Basically this test includes the changes you'd need to make to
`ui/borrowck/borrowck-closures-mut-of-imm.rs` in order to get rid of
occurrences of E0596. And then I realized that one needs to add
invocations of the closures in order to properly extend the mutable
reborrows in a manner such that NLL will roughly match AST-borrowck.)
This is based on the feedback from estebank:
"""
I believe that test can be removed outright. It'd be impossible for a
new change to go through that breaks this kind of output without it
being picked up by multiple other `stderr` tests. This is an artifact
of the transition period to the "new" output style.
"""
see: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52663#issuecomment-422155551