feat: add multiple getters mode in `generate_getter`
This commit adds two modes to generate_getter action.
First, the plain old working on single fields.
Second, working on a selected range of fields.
Should partially solve #13246
If this gets approved will create a separate PR for setters version of the same
### Points to help in review:
- `generate_getter_from_record_info` contains code which is mostly taken from assist before refactor
- Same goes for `parse_record_fields`
- There are changes in other assists, as one of the methods in utils named `find_struct_impl` is changed, before it used to accept a single `fn_name`, now it takes a list of function names to check against. All old impls are updated to create a small list to pass their single element.
### Assumptions:
- If any of the fields have an implementation, the action will quit.
fix: Don't catch the server activation error
We are are rethrowing and showing errors higher up in the call stack already. This just ate the error hiding the stacktrace unnecessarily.
Implement invocation strategy config
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/10793
This allows to change how we run build scripts (and `checkOnSave`), exposing two configs:
- `once`: run the specified command once in the project root (the working dir of the server)
- `per_workspace`: run the specified command per workspace in the corresponding workspace
This also applies to `checkOnSave` likewise, though `once_in_root` is useless there currently, due to https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/11007
Revert "feat: Diagnose some incorrect usages of the question mark operator"
Reverts rust-lang/rust-analyzer#13354
It seems like we are getting stuck with inference variables here, not just placeholders and errors so there is probably more wrong here that I don't understand. Reverting seems like the best solution right now as I don't have the time to look into this this week.
The reason for that was that we were calculating the crate defmaps
of the file we are saving by accident causing us to get stuck waiting
on their expensive computation, while we only need the relevant crate
id.
feat: Diagnose some incorrect usages of the question mark operator
Trying to figure out how the type stuff in r-a works some more, I think I am doing this correct here but I am not quite sure :)
Bump chalk
There's a bug in current chalk that prevents us from properly supporting GATs, which is supposed to be fixed in v0.86. Note the following:
- v0.86 is only going to be released next Sunday so I'll keep this PR as draft until then.
- This doesn't compile without https://github.com/rust-lang/chalk/pull/779, which I hope will be included in v0.86. I confirmed this compiles with it locally.
Two breaking changes from v0.84:
- `TypeFolder` has been split into `TypeFolder` and `FallibleTypeFolder` (https://github.com/rust-lang/chalk/pull/772)
- `ProjectionTy::self_type_parameter()` has been removed (https://github.com/rust-lang/chalk/pull/778)
Two breaking changes:
- `TypeFolder` has been split into `TypeFolder` and `FallibleTypeFolder`
- `ProjectionTy::self_type_parameter()` has been removed
