Fix misuse of rev attribute on <a> tag
The `rev` attribute is supposed to talk about "ownership" as far as I could found out. This attribute seems not very well defined in the HTML spec and its usage in rustdoc is suboptimal.
It was found out in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87149.
r? `@JohnTitor`
Update cargo
13 commits in 3ebb5f15a940810f250b68821149387af583a79e..66a6737a0c9f3a974af2dd032a65d3e409c77aac
2021-07-02 20:35:38 +0000 to 2021-07-14 20:54:28 +0000
- Add format option to `cargo tree` to print the lib_name (rust-lang/cargo#9663)
- Prefer patched versions of dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#9639)
- When a dependency does not have a version, git or path, fails directly (rust-lang/cargo#9686)
- Spot the crate typo easily (rust-lang/cargo#9665)
- remove unnecessary 'collect' (rust-lang/cargo#9616)
- Make it easier to run testsuite with a custom toolchain. (rust-lang/cargo#9679)
- Serialize `cargo fix` (rust-lang/cargo#9677)
- Don't recommend filing issues on rust-lang/cargo for Cargo.toml errors. (rust-lang/cargo#9658)
- Update nightly failure notification. (rust-lang/cargo#9657)
- Update Windows env uppercase key check. (rust-lang/cargo#9654)
- Unignore fix_edition_2021. (rust-lang/cargo#9662)
- Warning when using features in patch (rust-lang/cargo#9666)
- Unify cargo and rustc's error reporting (rust-lang/cargo#9655)
Add -Zfuture-incompat-test to assist with testing future-incompat reports.
This adds a `-Zfuture-incompat-test` cli flag to assist with testing future-incompatible reports. This flag causes all lints to be treated as a future-incompatible lint, and will emit a report for them. This is being added so that Cargo's testsuite can reliably test the reporting infrastructure. Right now, Cargo relies on using array_into_iter as a test subject. Since the breaking "future incompatible" lints are never intended to last forever, this means Cargo's testsuite would always need to keep changing to choose different lints (for example, #86330 proposed dropping that moniker for array_into_iter). With this flag, Cargo's tests can trigger any lint and check for the report.
Added Arc::try_pin
This helper is in line with other other allocation helpers on Arc.
I didn't think this would require an RFC or broader discussion, let me know if that's incorrect.
Reuse CrateNum for proc-macro crates even when cross-compiling
Proc-macros are always compiled for the host, so this should be the same
in every way as recompiling the crate.
I am not sure why the previous code special-cased the target, since the
compiler properly gives an error when trying to load a crate for a
different host:
```
error[E0461]: couldn't find crate `dependency` with expected target triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--> /home/joshua/rustc4/src/test/ui/cfg-dependent.rs:8:2
|
LL | dependency::is_64();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the following crate versions were found:
crate `dependency`, target triple i686-unknown-linux-gnu: /home/joshua/rustc4/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/cfg-dependent/auxiliary/libdependency.so
```
I think another possible fix is to remove the check altogether. But I'm
not sure, and this fix works, so I'm not making the larger change here.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56935.
r? `@petrochenkov` cc `@alexcrichton`
Proc-macros are always compiled for the host, so this should be the same
in every way as recompiling the crate.
I am not sure why the previous code special-cased the target, since the
compiler properly gives an error when trying to load a crate for a
different host:
```
error[E0461]: couldn't find crate `dependency` with expected target triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--> /home/joshua/rustc4/src/test/ui/cfg-dependent.rs:8:2
|
LL | dependency::is_64();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the following crate versions were found:
crate `dependency`, target triple i686-unknown-linux-gnu: /home/joshua/rustc4/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/cfg-dependent/auxiliary/libdependency.so
```
I think another possible fix is to remove the check altogether. But I'm
not sure, and this fix works, so I'm not making the larger change here.
Update compiler-builtins to 0.1.47
Bumped to `0.1.47` to resolve missing symbols on `aarch` when linking
`cargo`. This was due to a recent change in a `cargo` dependency on
`curl` (upstream C library added code that uses the uncommon `long
double` type).
r? `@tmandry`
Make the specialized Fuse still deal with None
Fixes#85863 by removing the assumption that we'll never see a cleared iterator in the `I: FusedIterator` specialization. Now all `Fuse` methods check for the possibility that `self.iter` is `None`, and the specialization only avoids _setting_ that to `None` in `&mut self` methods.
Bumped to `0.1.47` to resolve missing symbols on `aarch` when linking
`cargo`. This was due to a recent change in a `cargo` dependency on
`curl` (upstream C library added code that uses the uncommon `long
double` type).
Fix codeblocks overflow
Fixes#87043.
Instead of completely relying on `pulldown-cmark` (and its potential changes), I decided to move the generation of codeblocks HTML directly in rustdoc so we can unify the DOM and the CSS classes.
r? `@Nemo157`
expand: Support helper attributes for built-in derive macros
This is needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86735 (derive macro `Default` should have a helper attribute `default`).
With this PR we can specify helper attributes for built-in derives using syntax `#[rustc_builtin_macro(MacroName, attributes(attr1, attr2, ...))]` which mirrors equivalent syntax for proc macros `#[proc_macro_derive(MacroName, attributes(attr1, attr2, ...))]`.
Otherwise expansion infra was already ready for this.
The attribute parsing code is shared between proc macro derives and built-in macros (`fn parse_macro_name_and_helper_attrs`).
Handle non-integer const generic parameters in debuginfo type names.
This PR fixes an ICE introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85269 which started emitting const generic arguments for debuginfo names but did not cover the case where such an argument could not be evaluated to a flat string of bits.
The fix implemented in this PR is very basic: If `try_eval_bits()` fails for the constant in question, we fall back to generating a stable hash of the constant and emit that instead. This way we get a (virtually) unique name and side step the problem of generating a string representation of a potentially complex value.
The downside is that the generated name will be rather opaque. E.g. the regression test adds a function `const_generic_fn_non_int<()>` which is then rendered as `const_generic_fn_non_int<{CONST#fe3cfa0214ac55c7}>`. I think it's an open question how to deal with this more gracefully.
I'd be interested in ideas on how to do this better.
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc `@dpaoliello` (do you see any problems with this approach?)
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` & `@nagisa` (who I've seen comment on debuginfo issues recently -- anyone else?)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86893
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87085 (Search result colors)
- #87090 (Make BTreeSet::split_off name elements like other set methods do)
- #87098 (Unignore some pretty printing tests)
- #87099 (Upgrade `cc` crate to 1.0.69)
- #87101 (Suggest a path separator if a stray colon is found in a match arm)
- #87102 (Add GUI test for "go to first" feature)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
create method overview docs for core::option and core::result
The `Option` and `Result` types have large lists of methods. They each could use an overview page of methods grouped by category. These proposed overviews include "truth tables" for the underappreciated boolean operators/combinators of these types. The methods are already somewhat categorized in the source, but some logical groupings are broken up by the necessities of putting related methods in different `impl` blocks, for example.
This is based on #86209, but those are small changes and unlikely to conflict.
