Suggest from_utf8_unchecked in const contexts
Unfortunately I couldn't figure out how to check whether a given expression is in an `unsafe` context or not, so I just unconditionally emit the wrapping `unsafe {}` block in the suggestion. If there is an easy way to get it to work better then I would love to hear it.
changelog: Suggest `from_utf8_unchecked` instead of `from_utf8` in const contexts for ``[`transmute_bytes_to_str`]``
refs: #8379
Fix unnecessary_cast suggestion for type aliasses
Fix#6923. The [`unnecessary_cast`] lint now will skip casting to non-primitive type.
changelog: fix lint [`unnecessary_cast `]
`indexing_slicing` should not fire if a valid array index comes from a constant function that is evaluated at compile-time
fix#8348
changelog: [`indexing_slicing`] fewer false positives in `const` contexts and with `const` indices
fix misspelling in diagnostic message of `bytes_nth`
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: fix misspelling in diagnostic message in ``[`bytes_nth`]``
Run fmt test before compile-test/dogfood
I seem to always forget to run `cargo dev fmt` before doing a test. This lets it fail fast rather than going through the much longer compile-test/dogfood tests first
changelog: none
Allow running `cargo dev lint` on a package directory
Allows you run the local clippy in a specified directory, e.g. allowing
```sh
# Lint a ui-cargo test
cargo dev lint tests/ui-cargo/wildcard_dependencies/fail
# Lint some other project
cargo dev lint ~/my-project
```
The `target` directory is set to a tempdir which isn't ideal for medium/large projects as it would be compiled from scratch. This is to avoid cached clippy messages where you `cargo dev lint dir`, change something in clippy, and run `cargo dev lint dir` again
changelog: Dev: `cargo dev lint` can now be run on a package directory
This ensures that the link to the Clippy version in the Rust release
blog post works correctly. The additional `(beta)` behind the previous
beta version breaks that link otherwise.
Don't lint `cast_ptr_alignment` when used for unaligned reads and writes
fixes#2881
Ideally this would trace the usage of the value rather than only looking at the parent expression, but that would require dataflow analysis. e.g.
```rust
let x = ptr as *const u16;
c.read_unaligned(x);
```
Arch specific intrinsic functions need to be checked for ones which could take an unaligned pointer. This can be another PR.
changelog: Don't lint `cast_ptr_alignment` when used for unaligned reads and writes
Rework `undocumented_unsafe_blocks`
fixes: #8264fixes: #8449
One thing came up while working on this. Currently comments on the same line are supported like so:
```rust
/* SAFETY: reason */ unsafe {}
```
Is this worth supporting at all? Anything other than a couple of words doesn't really fit well.
edit: [zulip topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/.60undocumented_unsafe_blocks.60.20same.20line.20comment)
changelog: Don't lint `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` when the unsafe block comes from a proc-macro.
changelog: Don't lint `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` when the preceding line has a safety comment and the unsafe block is a sub-expression.
add `empty_structs_with_brackets`
<!-- Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only includes internal changes, you can just write
`changelog: none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change. Also, it's helpful for us that
the lint name is put into brackets `[]` and backticks `` ` ` ``,
e.g. ``[`lint_name`]``.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[ ] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[ ] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[ ] Added lint documentation
- \[ ] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR.
--
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
-->
Closes#8591
I'm already sorry for the massive diff 😅
changelog: New lint [`empty_structs_with_brackets`]
Remove deps
This remove both `regex` and `cargo_metadata` as dependencies making `clippy_dev` compile ~3x faster (~46s -> ~16s locally). `cargo_metadata` was used to extract the `version` field from `Cargo.toml`, which is done trivially without that. `regex` was used to parse `define_clippy_lint` in `update_lints` which is now done using `rustc_lexer`. This isn't any simpler, but it compiles ~15s faster and runs ~3x faster (~2.1s -> ~0.7s locally).
The next biggest offenders to compile times are `clap` and `winapi` on windows. `clap` could be removed, but re-implementing enough is probably more work than it's worth. `winapi` is used by `opener` and `walkdir` so it's stuck there.
changelog: none
Handle relative paths in module_files lints
The problem being that when clippy is run in the project's directory `lp` would be a relative path, this wasn't caught by the tests as there `lp` is an absolute path. Being a relative path it did not start with `trim_src_path` and so was ignored
Also allowed the removal of some `.to_os_string`/`.to_owned`s
changelog: Fixes [`self_named_module_files`] and [`mod_module_files`] not linting
Fixes#8123, cc `@DevinR528`
single_element_loop: handle arrays for Edition2021
changelog: [`single_element_loop`] handle arrays in Edition 2021, handle `.iter_mut()` and `.into_iter()`, and wrap in parens if necessary
Add `crate_in_macro_def` lint
This PR adds a lint to check for `crate` as opposed to `$crate` used in a macro definition.
I think this can close#4798. That issue focused on the case where the macro author "imports something into said macro."
But I think use of `crate` is likely to be a bug whether it appears in a `use` statement or not. There could be some use case I am failing to see, though. (cc: `@nilscript` `@flip1995)`
changelog: `crate_in_macro_def`
