Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift
This time there are a bunch of bugfixes, some new llvm intrinsic implementations and refactorings to the build system in preparation for running cg_clif tests as part of `./x.py test`.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
Update cargo
8 commits in 70898e522116f6c23971e2a554b2dc85fd4c84cd..cc0a320879c17207bbfb96b5d778e28a2c62030d 2022-12-05 19:43:44 +0000 to 2022-12-14 14:46:57 +0000
- artifact deps should works when target field specified coexists with `optional = true` (rust-lang/cargo#11434)
- Add `home` crate to cargo crates (rust-lang/cargo#11359)
- Use proper git URL for GitHub repos (rust-lang/cargo#11475)
- Fixes flock(fd, LOCK_UN) emulation on Solaris. (rust-lang/cargo#11474)
- Allow Check targets needed for optional doc-scraping to fail without killing the build (rust-lang/cargo#11450)
- fix: gleaning rustdocflags from `target.cfg(…)` is not supported (rust-lang/cargo#11323)
- Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#11470)
- resolver.md: Fix naming in example (rust-lang/cargo#11469)
r? `@ghost`
8 commits in 70898e522116f6c23971e2a554b2dc85fd4c84cd..cc0a320879c17207bbfb96b5d778e28a2c62030d
2022-12-05 19:43:44 +0000 to 2022-12-14 14:46:57 +0000
- artifact deps should works when target field specified coexists with `optional = true` (rust-lang/cargo#11434)
- Add `home` crate to cargo crates (rust-lang/cargo#11359)
- Use proper git URL for GitHub repos (rust-lang/cargo#11475)
- Fixes flock(fd, LOCK_UN) emulation on Solaris. (rust-lang/cargo#11474)
- Allow Check targets needed for optional doc-scraping to fail without killing the build (rust-lang/cargo#11450)
- fix: gleaning rustdocflags from `target.cfg(…)` is not supported (rust-lang/cargo#11323)
- Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#11470)
- resolver.md: Fix naming in example (rust-lang/cargo#11469)
Add a test for #92481
The test was copied ad-hoc from #92481, but I can't get the test to pass, because of needing to get twice the same error on the last line of the source.
Closes#92481
Use more LFS functions.
On Linux, use mmap64, open64, openat64, and sendfile64 in place of their non-LFS counterparts.
This is relevant to #94173.
With these changes (together with rust-lang/backtrace-rs#501), the simple binaries I produce with rustc seem to have no non-LFS functions, so maybe #94173 is fixed. But I can't be sure if I've missed something and maybe some non-LFS functions could sneak in somehow.
rustdoc: simplify popover CSS
* Merge the color-changing block into the regular rules, which was probably written that way because it used to be in the theme files, but has no reason to be written this way now that it's in rustdoc.css
* Get rid of redundant `display: block`, since `position: absolute` blockifies the layout anyway.
fold instead of obliterating args
Fixes#105608
we call `const_eval_resolve` on the following constant:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Unevaluated {
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Value(0x0),
_,
]
}
_,
],
```
when expanded out to `ConstKind::Expr` there are no infer vars so we attempt to evaluate it after replacing infer vars with garbage, however the current logic for replacing with garbage replaces _the whole arg containing the infer var_ rather than just the infer var. This means that after garbage replacement has occured we attempt to evaluate:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
PLACEHOLDER,
PLACEHOLDER,
],
```
Which then leads to ctfe being unable to evaluate the const. With this PR we attempt to evaluate:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Unevaluated {
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Value(0x0),
PLACEHOLDER,
]
}
PLACEHOLDER,
],
```
which ctfe _can_ handle.
I am not entirely sure why this function is supposed to replace params with placeholders rather than just inference vars 🤔
Illegal sized bounds: only suggest mutability change if needed
In a scenario like
```rust
struct Type;
pub trait Trait {
fn function(&mut self)
where
Self: Sized;
}
impl Trait for Type {
fn function(&mut self) {}
}
fn main() {
(&mut Type as &mut dyn Trait).function();
}
```
the problem is Sized, not the mutability of self. Thus don't emit the "you need &T instead of &mut T" note, or the other way around, as all it does is just invert the mutability of whatever was supplied.
Fixes#103622.
Refine when invalid prefix case error arises
Fix cases where the "invalid base prefix for number literal" error arises with suffixes that look erroneously capitalized but which are actually invalid.
Add docs for question mark operator for Option
As a beginner learning rust, it took me a while to figure out what `?` was doing with Options. I think the documentation of this could be improved.
I've used the question mark documentation from the `Result` type as a template here, and tried to come up with a simple example as well.
