add `Vec::extend_from_within` method under `vec_extend_from_within` feature gate
Implement <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2714>
### tl;dr
This PR adds a `extend_from_within` method to `Vec` which allows copying elements from a range to the end:
```rust
#![feature(vec_extend_from_within)]
let mut vec = vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4];
vec.extend_from_within(2..);
assert_eq!(vec, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4]);
vec.extend_from_within(..2);
assert_eq!(vec, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 0, 1]);
vec.extend_from_within(4..8);
assert_eq!(vec, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 0, 1, 4, 2, 3, 4]);
```
### Implementation notes
Originally I've copied `@Shnatsel's` [implementation](690742a0de/src/lib.rs (L74)) with some minor changes to support other ranges:
```rust
pub fn append_from_within<R>(&mut self, src: R)
where
T: Copy,
R: RangeBounds<usize>,
{
let len = self.len();
let Range { start, end } = src.assert_len(len);;
let count = end - start;
self.reserve(count);
unsafe {
// This is safe because `reserve()` above succeeded,
// so `self.len() + count` did not overflow usize
ptr::copy_nonoverlapping(
self.get_unchecked(src.start),
self.as_mut_ptr().add(len),
count,
);
self.set_len(len + count);
}
}
```
But then I've realized that this duplicates most of the code from (private) `Vec::append_elements`, so I've used it instead.
Then I've applied `@KodrAus` suggestions from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79015#issuecomment-727200852.
Update armhf-gnu to Ubuntu 20.04
This requires updating the used Linux kernel to avoid an assembler
error, the used busybox version to avoid a linker error, the used
rootfs to match the host version and the qemu flags to work with
the newer version.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Update cargo
5 commits in c3abcfe8a75901c7c701557a728941e8fb19399e..e099df243bb2495b9b197f79c19f124032b1e778
2021-01-25 16:16:43 +0000 to 2021-02-01 16:24:34 +0000
- Impl warn for locked install without Cargo.lock (rust-lang/cargo#9108)
- Document -Z extra-link-arg. (rust-lang/cargo#9121)
- Flip 'foo' and 'bar' to be consistent (rust-lang/cargo#9120)
- Don't try to parse MSRV if feature is not enabled (rust-lang/cargo#9115)
- simplify char range check (rust-lang/cargo#9110)
Fix primitive search in parameters and returned values
Part of #60485.
Fixes#74780.
Replacing #74879.
cc `@camelid` `@jyn514` `@CraftSpider`
r? `@ollie27`
Add visitors for checking #[inline]
Add visitors for checking #[inline] with struct field
Fix test for #[inline]
Add visitors for checking #[inline] with #[macro_export] macro
Add visitors for checking #[inline] without #[macro_export] macro
Add use alias with Visitor
Fix lint error
Reduce unnecessary variable
Co-authored-by: LingMan <LingMan@users.noreply.github.com>
Change error to warning
Add warning for checking field, arm with #[allow_internal_unstable]
Add name resolver
Formatting
Formatting
Fix error fixture
Add checking field, arm, macro def
Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift
The highlight of this sync are abi compatibility with cg_llvm allowing mixing of cg_clif and cg_llvm compiled crates and switching to the x64 cranelift backend based on the new backend framework.
r? ``@ghost``
``@rustbot`` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
Fix calling convention for CRT startup
My PR #81478 used the wrong calling convention for a set of
functions that are called by the CRT. These functions need to use
`extern "C"`.
This would only affect x86, which is the only target (that I know of)
that has multiple calling conventions.
```@bors``` r? ```@m-ou-se```
Avoid building LLVM just for llvm-dwp
When the LLVM backend is disabled, the llvm-project submodule is not checked out by default. This breaks the bootstrap test for cg_clif. As cg_clif doesn't support split debuginfo anyway llvm-dwp is not necessary. Other backends would likely not want to build LLVM just for llvm-dwp either.
Fixes https://github.com/bjorn3/rustc_codegen_cranelift/issues/1119
Indicate both start and end of pass RSS in time-passes output
Previously, only the end of pass RSS was indicated. This could easily
lead one to believe that the change in RSS from one pass to the next was
attributable to the second pass, when in fact it occurred between the
end of the first pass and the start of the second.
Also, improve alignment of columns.
Sample of output:
```
time: 0.739; rss: 607MB -> 637MB item_types_checking
time: 8.429; rss: 637MB -> 775MB item_bodies_checking
time: 11.063; rss: 470MB -> 775MB type_check_crate
time: 0.232; rss: 775MB -> 777MB match_checking
time: 0.139; rss: 777MB -> 779MB liveness_and_intrinsic_checking
time: 0.372; rss: 775MB -> 779MB misc_checking_2
time: 8.188; rss: 779MB -> 1019MB MIR_borrow_checking
time: 0.062; rss: 1019MB -> 1021MB MIR_effect_checking
```
Add error message for private fn
Attempts to add a more detailed error when a `const_evaluatable` fn from another scope is used inside of a scope which cannot access it.
r? ````@lcnr````
Let io::copy reuse BufWriter buffers
This optimization will allow users to implicitly set the buffer size for io::copy by wrapping the writer into a `BufWriter` if the default block size is insufficient, which should fix#49921
Due to min_specialization limitations this approach only works with `BufWriter` but not for `BufReader<R>` since `R` is unconstrained and thus the necessary specialization on `R: Read` is not always applicable. Once specialization becomes more powerful this optimization could be extended to look at the reader and writer side and use whichever buffer is larger.
Implement Rust 2021 panic
This implements the Rust 2021 versions of `panic!()`. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80162 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3007.
It does so by replacing `{std, core}::panic!()` by a bulitin macro that expands to either `$crate::panic::panic_2015!(..)` or `$crate::panic::panic_2021!(..)` depending on the edition of the caller.
This does not yet make std's panic an alias for core's panic on Rust 2021 as the RFC proposes. That will be a separate change: c5273bdfb2 That change is blocked on figuring out what to do with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80846 first.
Implement <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2714>, changes from the RFC:
- Rename the method `append_from_within` => `extend_from_within`
- Loose :Copy bound => :Clone
- Specialize in case of :Copy
This commit also adds `Vec::split_at_spare` private method and use it to implement
`Vec::spare_capacity_mut` and `Vec::extend_from_within`. This method returns 2
slices - initialized elements (same as `&mut vec[..]`) and uninitialized but
allocated space (same as `vec.spare_capacity_mut()`).
My PR #81478 used the wrong calling convention for a set of
functions that are called by the CRT. These functions need to use
`extern "C"`.
This would only affect x86, which is the only target (that I know of)
that has multiple calling conventions.
Edit multiple error code Markdown files
Makes small edits to several error code files. Fixes some missing punctuation. Changes some wording, grammar, and formatting for clarity and readability.
Adds a link to the rustup book in E0658.
Add a test for #71202Closes#71202
---
Note that the test normally generates this warning:
```
warning: cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types
--> test.rs:10:5
|
10 | / const ITEM_IS_COPY: [(); 1 - {
11 | | trait NotCopy {
12 | | const VALUE: bool = false;
13 | | }
... |
26 | | <IsCopy<T>>::VALUE
27 | | } as usize] = [];
| |_____________________^
|
= note: `#[warn(const_evaluatable_unchecked)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #76200 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76200>
```
I added `allow(const_evaluatable_unchecked)`, but maybe we just don't want to add a test for this as the program is not really valid?
Don't link with --export-dynamic on wasm32-wasi
Remove --export-dynamic from the link arguments on the wasm32-wasi
target, as it emits spurious exports and increases code size.
Leave it in place for wasm32-unknown-unknown and
wasm32-unknown-emscripten. Even though it isn't a great solution
there, users are likely depending on its behavior there.
Remove const_in_array_repeat
Fixes#80371. Fixes#81315. Fixes#80767. Fixes#75682.
I thought there might be some issue with `Repeats(_, 0)`, but if you increase the items in the array it still ICEs. I'm not sure if this is the best fix but it does fix the given issue.
2229: Fix issues with move closures and mutability
This PR fixes two issues when feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is used.
1. Can't mutate using a mutable reference
2. Move closures try to move value out through a reference.
To do so, we
1. Compute the mutability of the capture and store it as part of the `CapturedPlace` that is written in TypeckResults
2. Restrict capture precision. Note this is temporary for now, to allow the feature to be used with move closures and ByValue captures and might change depending on discussions with the lang team.
- No Derefs are captured for ByValue captures, since that will result in value behind a reference getting moved.
- No projections are applied to raw pointers since these require unsafe blocks. We capture
them completely.
r? `````@nikomatsakis`````
