curl's progress meter would otherwise interfere with sudo's password prompt.
In addition, add the -f flag to make sure 4xx status codes are treated as errors.
r? @brson
The Send bound is an unnecessary restriction, and though provided as a convenience, can't be removed by downstream code.
The removal of this bound is a [breaking-change] since it removes an implicit Send bound on all `E: Error` and all `Error` trait objects.
To migrate, consider if your code actually requires the Send bound and, if so, add it explicitly.
Fixes#23774
r? @aturon
Previously a panic was generated for recursive prints due to a double-borrow of
a `RefCell`. This was solved by the second borrow's output being directed
towards the global stdout instead of the per-thread stdout (still experimental
functionality).
After this functionality was altered, however, recursive prints still deadlocked
due to the overridden `write_fmt` method which locked itself first and then
wrote all the data. This was fixed by removing the override of the `write_fmt`
method. This means that unlocked usage of `write!` on a `Stdout`/`Stderr` may be
slower due to acquiring more locks, but it's easy to make more performant with a
call to `.lock()`.
Closes#23781
Previously a panic was generated for recursive prints due to a double-borrow of
a `RefCell`. This was solved by the second borrow's output being directed
towards the global stdout instead of the per-thread stdout (still experimental
functionality).
After this functionality was altered, however, recursive prints still deadlocked
due to the overridden `write_fmt` method which locked itself first and then
wrote all the data. This was fixed by removing the override of the `write_fmt`
method. This means that unlocked usage of `write!` on a `Stdout`/`Stderr` may be
slower due to acquiring more locks, but it's easy to make more performant with a
call to `.lock()`.
Closes#23781
The Send bound is an unnecessary restriction, and though provided as a
convenience, can't be removed by downstream code.
The removal of this bound is a [breaking-change] since it
removes an implicit Send bound on all `E: Error` and all
`Error` trait objects.
To migrate, consider if your code actually requires the Send
bound and, if so, add it explicitly.
Fixes#23774
`std::dynamic_library` is currently using `std::old_io::Path` specifically. This change brings the API in alignment with `std::fs::File` by having it take `std::path::AsPath`. The Windows code should work, but I admittedly haven't tried it (I don't have a Windows machine readily available right now).
r? @alexcrichton
When testing whether a default method predicates are satisfiable,
combine normalization with this check so that we also skip the
default method if normalization fails. Fixes#23485.
r? @nrc (I tried to address your nit from before as well)
Fixes#11794
I mostly removed superflous examples which use the standard library.
I have one more quesiton here though: threads. They're mostly a library thing, at this point, right?
This commit removes parser support for `extern crate "foo" as bar` as the
renamed crate is now required to be an identifier. Additionally this commit
enables hard errors on crate names that contain hyphens in them, they must now
solely contain alphanumeric characters or underscores.
If the crate name is inferred from the file name, however, the file name
`foo-bar.rs` will have the crate name inferred as `foo_bar`. If a binary is
being emitted it will have the name `foo-bar` and a library will have the name
`libfoo_bar.rlib`.
This commit is a breaking change for a number of reasons:
* Old syntax is being removed. This was previously only issuing warnings.
* The output for the compiler when input is received on stdin is now `rust_out`
instead of `rust-out`.
* The crate name for a crate in the file `foo-bar.rs` is now `foo_bar` which can
affect infrastructure such as logging.
[breaking-change]
This allows `Wrapping<T>` to be used in `assert_eq!`, for example.
One of the tests (compile-fail/xc-private-method.rs) fails, but I can hardly imagine it is related to this change. I would also like to add a tests to ensure that `assert_eq!` compiles and keeps working in the future for `Wrapped<T>` values, but there appear to be no tests in libcore. What would be a good place to add such a test?
Windows gets quite unhappy when a thread fails while the main thread is exiting,
frequently leading to process deadlock. This has been causing quite a few
deadlocks on the windows bots recently. The child threads are presumably failing
because the `println!` is failing due to the main thread being shut down.
Marks as `#[stable}`:
* `ok_or`
* `ok_or_else`
* `iter_mut`
* `cloned`
Similarly to `IteratorExt::cloned`, the `cloned` method is pared down to
work only on `Option<&T>`. Thus, this is a:
[breaking-change]
r? @alexcrichton
Now that `<[_]>::split` is an inherent method, it will trump `BufRead::split`
when `BufRead` is in scope, so there is no longer a conflict. As a result,
calling `slice.split()` will probably always give you precisely what you want!
