This commit cleans out a large amount of deprecated APIs from the standard
library and some of the facade crates as well, updating all users in the
compiler and in tests as it goes along.
Rationale for this, is that I lurked `ulimit -c unlimited` into my .profile to debug an unrelated crash, that I kept forgetting to set before hand. I then ran the test suite and discovered that I had 150 gigs of core dumps in `/cores`.
Very open to another approach, or to setting the limit to something higher than 0, but I think it would be nice if the build system tried to save you from yourself here.
This commit stabilizes the `std::num` module:
* The `Int` and `Float` traits are deprecated in favor of (1) the
newly-added inherent methods and (2) the generic traits available in
rust-lang/num.
* The `Zero` and `One` traits are reintroduced in `std::num`, which
together with various other traits allow you to recover the most
common forms of generic programming.
* The `FromStrRadix` trait, and associated free function, is deprecated
in favor of inherent implementations.
* A wide range of methods and constants for both integers and floating
point numbers are now `#[stable]`, having been adjusted for integer
guidelines.
* `is_positive` and `is_negative` are renamed to `is_sign_positive` and
`is_sign_negative`, in order to address #22985
* The `Wrapping` type is moved to `std::num` and stabilized;
`WrappingOps` is deprecated in favor of inherent methods on the
integer types, and direct implementation of operations on
`Wrapping<X>` for each concrete integer type `X`.
Closes#22985Closes#21069
[breaking-change]
r? @alexcrichton
This commit stabilizes the `std::num` module:
* The `Int` and `Float` traits are deprecated in favor of (1) the
newly-added inherent methods and (2) the generic traits available in
rust-lang/num.
* The `Zero` and `One` traits are reintroduced in `std::num`, which
together with various other traits allow you to recover the most
common forms of generic programming.
* The `FromStrRadix` trait, and associated free function, is deprecated
in favor of inherent implementations.
* A wide range of methods and constants for both integers and floating
point numbers are now `#[stable]`, having been adjusted for integer
guidelines.
* `is_positive` and `is_negative` are renamed to `is_sign_positive` and
`is_sign_negative`, in order to address #22985
* The `Wrapping` type is moved to `std::num` and stabilized;
`WrappingOps` is deprecated in favor of inherent methods on the
integer types, and direct implementation of operations on
`Wrapping<X>` for each concrete integer type `X`.
Closes#22985Closes#21069
[breaking-change]
This functions swaps the order of arguments to a few functions that previously
took (output, input) parameters, but now take (input, output) parameters (in
that order).
The affected functions are:
* ptr::copy
* ptr::copy_nonoverlapping
* slice::bytes::copy_memory
* intrinsics::copy
* intrinsics::copy_nonoverlapping
Closes#22890
[breaking-change]
Based on the comment from @apasel422 in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/23791#issuecomment-87095298.
Where @apasel422 proposed
```
Moves the value out of the option if it is `Some`, or panics if it is `None`.
```
I include in this PR the version
```
Moves the value `v` out of the `Option` if it is `Some(v)`, or panics if it is `None`.
```
which
- is a little bit more precise about what value is actually returned
- uses `Option` over just "option" in the part `out of the [Option]
r? @steveklabnik, @apasel422
Disallow writing through mutable pointers stored in non-mut Box.
Fix#14270
The fix works by making `cmt::freely_aliasable` result more fine-grained.
Instead of encoding the aliasability (i.e. whether the cmt is uniquely writable or not) as an option, now pass back an enum indicating either: 1. freely-aliasable (thus not uniquely-writable), 2. non-aliasable (thus uniquely writable), or 3. unique but immutable (and thus not uniquely writable, according to proposal from issue #14270.)
This is all of course a giant hack that will hopefully go away with an eventually removal of special treatment of `Box<T>` (aka `ty_unique`) from the compiler.
Due to a long-standing conservative approach to trait exports, all traits are
considered exported. However, the missing_docs lint uses the export map to
determine if something is public and ought to have documentation. This commit
modifies the lint to check if traits are private before emitting the warning.
Closes#11592
Currently if a rustdoc test panics then the fatal error message is not forwarded to the user. This change will have the test runner prefer forwarding anything on the stderr of the test process.
The documentation says that 'The current convention is to use the `test` module
to hold your "unit-style"' but then defines the module as "tests" instead.
Also in the output of the command we can see:
```
test test::it_works ... ok
```
So I think the name of the module was meant to be "test"
To not use `old_io` and `os`, which are deprecated. Since there is no more `MemoryMap` used byte parsing instead to generate the second potential error.
You can see the code working fine [here](http://is.gd/4g0wwp) on the PlayPen.
Due to a long-standing conservative approach to trait exports, all traits are
considered exported. However, the missing_docs lint uses the export map to
determine if something is public and ought to have documentation. This commit
modifies the lint to check if traits are private before emitting the warning.
Closes#11592
This functions swaps the order of arguments to a few functions that previously
took (output, input) parameters, but now take (input, output) parameters (in
that order).
The affected functions are:
* ptr::copy
* ptr::copy_nonoverlapping
* slice::bytes::copy_memory
* intrinsics::copy
* intrinsics::copy_nonoverlapping
Closes#22890
[breaking-change]
The current binary operator code assumed that if the LHS was a scalar (`i32` etc), then the RHS had to match. This is not true with multidispatch. This PR generalizes the existing code to (primarily) use the traits -- this also allows us to defer the precise type-checking when the types aren't fully known. The one caveat is the unstable SIMD types, which don't fit in with the current traits -- in that case, the LHS type must be known to be SIMD ahead of time.
There is one semi-hacky bit in that during writeback, for builtin operators, if the types resolve to scalars (i32 etc) then we clear the method override. This is because we know what the semantics are and it is more efficient to generate the code directly. It also ensures that we can use these overloaded operators in constants and so forth.
cc @japaric
cc @aturon
Fixes#23319 (and others).
Instead of encoding the aliasability (i.e. whether the cmt is uniquely
writable or not) as an option, now pass back an enum indicating
either: 1. freely-aliasable (thus not uniquely-writable),
2. non-aliasble (thus uniquely writable), or 3. unique but immutable
(and thus not uniquely writable, according to proposal from issue
14270.)
This is all of course a giant hack that will hopefully go away with an
eventually removal of special treatment of `Box<T>` (aka `ty_unique`)
from the compiler.
This saves a bunch of a time and will make distributions smaller, as well as
avoiding filling the implementors page with internal garbage. Turn it back on
with `--enable-compiler-docs` if you want them.
(Crates behind the facade are not documented at all)
[breaking-change]
This is due to a [breaking-change] to operators. The primary affected
code is uses of the `Rng` trait where we used to (incorrectly) infer the
right-hand-side type from the left-hand-side, in the case that the LHS
type was a scalar like `i32`. The fix is to add a type annotation like
`x + rng.gen::<i32>()`.
the plan is to treat all binary operators as if they were overloaded,
relying on the fact that we have impls for all the builtin scalar
operations (and no more). But then during writeback we clear the
overload if the types correspond to a builtin op.
This strategy allows us to avoid having to know the types of the
operands ahead of time. It also avoids us overspecializing as we did in
the past.
The documentation says that 'The current convention is to use the `test` module
to hold your "unit-style"' but then defines the module as "tests" instead.
