confirm using chain in collapsible_span_lint_calls
close#8798
This PR fixes false positive when using chain in `collapsible_span_lint_calls`.
changelog: None
put parentheses around neg_multiply suggestion if needed
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: [`neg_multiply`]: put parentheses around suggestion if needed
`For` example should be used instead `while` in WHILE_LET_ON_ITERATOR
For example should be used instead while in WHILE_LET_ON_ITERATOR
Revert some changes
Fix cargo dev fmt
feat(fix): ignore `todo!` and `unimplemented!` in `if_same_then_else`
close: #8836
take over: #8853
This PR adds check `todo!` and `unimplemented!` in if_same_then_else.
( I thought `unimplemented` should not be checked as well as todo!.)
Thank you in advance.
changelog: ignore todo! and unimplemented! in if_same_then_else
r? `@Jarcho`
Use `RefCell` in `needless_return` tests
changelog: none
The stdio locks no longer fail to compile if the `return` is removed due to them now being `'static` (#9008)
feat(lint): add default_iter_empty
close#8915
This PR adds `default_iter_empty` lint.
This lint checks `std::iter::Empty::default()` and replace with `std::iter::empty()`.
Thank you in advance.
---
changelog: add `default_instead_of_iter_empty` lint.
Update description in clippy_lints/src/default_iter_empty.rs
Co-authored-by: Fridtjof Stoldt <xFrednet@gmail.com>
Update clippy_lints/src/default_iter_empty.rs
Co-authored-by: Alex Macleod <alex@macleod.io>
Update clippy_lints/src/default_iter_empty.rs
Co-authored-by: Alex Macleod <alex@macleod.io>
renamed default_iter_empty to default_instead_of_iter_empty
Avoid duplicate messages
add tests for regression
rewrite 'Why is this bad?'
cargo dev fmt
delete default_iter_empty lint in renamed_lint.rs
rewrite a message in the suggestion
cargo dev update_lints --check
Make `ExprKind::Closure` a struct variant.
Simple refactor since we both need it to introduce additional fields in `ExprKind::Closure`.
r? ``@Aaron1011``
Rework `branches_sharing_code`
fixes#7378
This changes the lint from checking pairs of blocks, to checking all the blocks at the same time. As such there's almost none of the original code left.
changelog: Don't lint `branches_sharing_code` when using different binding names
And likewise for the `Const::val` method.
Because its type is called `ConstKind`. Also `val` is a confusing name
because `ConstKind` is an enum with seven variants, one of which is
called `Value`. Also, this gives consistency with `TyS` and `PredicateS`
which have `kind` fields.
The commit also renames a few `Const` variables from `val` to `c`, to
avoid confusion with the `ConstKind::Value` variant.
