Currently we have two files implementing bitsets (and 2D bit matrices).
This commit combines them into one, taking the best features from each.
This involves renaming a lot of things. The high level changes are as
follows.
- bitvec.rs --> bit_set.rs
- indexed_set.rs --> (removed)
- BitArray + IdxSet --> BitSet (merged, see below)
- BitVector --> GrowableBitSet
- {,Sparse,Hybrid}IdxSet --> {,Sparse,Hybrid}BitSet
- BitMatrix --> BitMatrix
- SparseBitMatrix --> SparseBitMatrix
The changes within the bitset types themselves are as follows.
```
OLD OLD NEW
BitArray<C> IdxSet<T> BitSet<T>
-------- ------ ------
grow - grow
new - (remove)
new_empty new_empty new_empty
new_filled new_filled new_filled
- to_hybrid to_hybrid
clear clear clear
set_up_to set_up_to set_up_to
clear_above - clear_above
count - count
contains(T) contains(&T) contains(T)
contains_all - superset
is_empty - is_empty
insert(T) add(&T) insert(T)
insert_all - insert_all()
remove(T) remove(&T) remove(T)
words words words
words_mut words_mut words_mut
- overwrite overwrite
merge union union
- subtract subtract
- intersect intersect
iter iter iter
```
In general, when choosing names I went with:
- names that are more obvious (e.g. `BitSet` over `IdxSet`).
- names that are more like the Rust libraries (e.g. `T` over `C`,
`insert` over `add`);
- names that are more set-like (e.g. `union` over `merge`, `superset`
over `contains_all`, `domain_size` over `num_bits`).
Also, using `T` for index arguments seems more sensible than `&T` --
even though the latter is standard in Rust collection types -- because
indices are always copyable. It also results in fewer `&` and `*`
sigils in practice.
The strategy is this:
- we compute SCCs once all outlives constraints are known
- we allocate a set of values **per region** for storing liveness
- we allocate a set of values **per SCC** for storing the final values
- when we add a liveness constraint to the region R, we also add it
to the final value of the SCC to which R belongs
- then we can apply the constraints by just walking the DAG for the
SCCs and union'ing the children (which have their liveness
constraints within)
There are a few intermediate refactorings that I really ought to have
broken out into their own commits:
- reverse the constraint graph so that `R1: R2` means `R1 -> R2` and
not `R2 -> R1`. This fits better with the SCC computation and new
style of inference (`->` now means "take value from" and not "push
value into")
- this does affect some of the UI tests, since they traverse the
graph, but mostly the artificial ones and they don't necessarily
seem worse
- put some things (constraint set, etc) into `Rc`. This lets us root
them to permit mutation and iteration. It also guarantees they don't
change, which is critical to the correctness of the algorithm.
- Generalize various helpers that previously operated only on points
to work on any sort of region element.
This commit alters the `query` function in the dep graph module to preallocate
memory using `with_capacity` instead of relying on automatic growth. Discovered
in #44576 it was found that for the syntex_syntax clean incremental benchmark
the peak memory usage was found when the dep graph was being saved, particularly
the `DepGraphQuery` data structure itself. PRs like #44142 which add more
queries end up just making this much larger!
I didn't see an immediately obvious way to reduce the size of the
`DepGraphQuery` object, but it turns out that `with_capacity` helps quite a bit!
Locally 831 MB was used [before] this commit, and 770 MB is in use at the peak
of the compiler [after] this commit. That's a nice 7.5% improvement! This won't
quite make up for the losses in #44142 but I figured it's a good start.
[before]: https://gist.github.com/alexcrichton/2d2b9c7a65503761925c5a0bcfeb0d1e
[before]: https://gist.github.com/alexcrichton/6da51f2a6184bfb81694cc44f06deb5b
We used to propagate bits in node-id order, which sometimes caused an
excessive number of iterations, especially when macros were present. As
everyone knows, visiting the CFG in RPO bounds the number of iterators
by 1 plus the depth of the most deeply nested loop (times the height of
the lattice, which is 1).
Fixes#43704.
Use where clasues and only where clauses for bounds in the
iterators for Graph.
The rest of the code uses bounds on the generic declarations for
Debug, and we may want to change those to for consistency. I did
not do that here because I don't know whether or not that's a good
idea. But for the iterators, they were inconsistent causing
confusion, at least for me.
