They don't implement FnLikeNode anymore, instead are handled differently
further up in the call tree. Also, keep less information (just def ids
for the args).
Setup two tasks, one of which only processes the signatures, in order to
isolate the typeck entries for signatures from those for bodies.
Fixes#36078Fixes#37720
This used to work with the rustc_clean attribute, but doesn't anymore
since my rebase; but I don't know enough about the type checking to find
out what's wrong. The dep graph looks like this:
ItemSignature(xxxx) -> CollectItem(xxxx)
CollectItem(xxxx) -> ItemSignature(xxxx)
ItemSignature(xxxx) -> TypeckItemBody(yyyy)
HirBody(xxxx) -> CollectItem(xxxx)
The cycle between CollectItem and ItemSignature looks wrong, and my
guess is the CollectItem -> ItemSignature edge shouldn't be there, but
I'm not sure how to prevent it.
Support `?Sized` in where clauses
Implemented as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20503#issuecomment-258677026 - `?Trait` bounds are moved on type parameter definitions when possible, reported as errors otherwise.
(It'd be nice to unify bounds and where clauses in HIR, but this is mostly blocked by rustdoc now - it needs to render bounds in pleasant way and the best way to do it so far is to mirror what was written in source code.)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20503
r? @nikomatsakis
Avoid loading needless proc-macro dependencies
Fixes#37958 when no proc-macros are exported; in particular, without `pub extern crate proc_macros;`, `#![feature(macro_reexport)]`, or `#![feature(use_extern_macros)]`.
I opened https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/3334 for exported proc macros.
r? @alexcrichton
[7/n] rustc: desugar UFCS in HIR and don't use DefMap for associated resolutions.
_This is part of a series ([prev](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37412) | [next](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37688)) of patches designed to rework rustc into an out-of-order on-demand pipeline model for both better feature support (e.g. [MIR-based](https://github.com/solson/miri) early constant evaluation) and incremental execution of compiler passes (e.g. type-checking), with beneficial consequences to IDE support as well.
If any motivation is unclear, please ask for additional PR description clarifications or code comments._
<hr>
Previously, a path like `T::Assoc::method`, while equivalent to `<<T>::Assoc>::method`, wasn't desugared in any way at the HIR level and everything inspecting it had to either deal with knowing only `T` (before typeck) or knowing only the definition of `method` (after typeck).
Such a path also had only one `NodeId` and associated resolution during typeck modified `DefMap`, in a way that would be hard for incremental recompilation to track, and inconvenient for partial type conversions from HIR to `Ty`, which are required to break faux-cycles in on-demand type collection.
The desugarings performed by this PR are as follows:
* `use a::{b,c};` is flattened to `use a as _; use a::b; use a::c;`
* as resolution is complete, `use a as _;` doesn't do anything, except get checked for stability
* `Vec::new` (an expression) becomes `Vec<..>::new<..>`, to distinguish it from `<Vec>::new<..>`
* the "infer all parameters" `<..>` form is internal and not even pretty-printed
* used when there are no type parameters at all, in an expression or pattern path segment
* `T::A::B` becomes `<<T>::A>::B` in a type, and `<<T<..>>::A<..>>::B<..>` in an expression/pattern
* one additional `hir::Ty` node is created for each prefix, starting with the fully-resolved type (`T`) and extending it with each segment (e.g. `<T>::A`)
* fully-resolved paths contain their `Def` in HIR, getting rid of the `DefMap` and absolving incremental recompilation of needing to manually look up nodes to handle that side information
Not keeping the `DefMap` around meant that associated resolutions had to be stored somewhere else:
* expressions and patterns use a new `NodeId -> Def` map in `ty::Tables`
* compatible with the future per-body (constant / `fn` / closure) `Tables`
* types are accessible via `Ty` and the usual per-item generics / predicates / type
* `rustdoc` and `save-analysis` are the only situations which insist on mapping syntactical types to semantical ones, or at least understand the resolution of associated types, therefore the type conversion cache, i.e. a `NodeId -> Ty` map, is exposed by typeck for this purpose
* stability had to be split into a pass that runs on HIR and checks the results of name resolution, and impromptu checks triggered by `typeck` for associated paths, methods, fields, etc.
* privacy using semantic types results in accurate reachability for `impl Trait`, which fixes#35870, and thorough introspection of associated types, which may allow relaxing private-in-public checking on bounds, while keeping the intended ban on projections with private type parameters
cc @petrochenkov
Use displacement instead of initial bucket in HashMap code
Use displacement instead of initial bucket in HashMap code. It makes the code a bit cleaner and also saves a few instructions (handy since it'll be using some to do some sort of adaptive behavior soon).