Refactor lints in methods module
This PR refactors methods lints other than the lints I refactored in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/6826 and moves some functions to methods/utils.rs.
Basically, I follow the instruction described in #6680.
**For ease of review, I refactored step by step, keeping each commit small.**
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6886
cc: `@phansch,` `@flip1995,` `@Y-Nak`
changelog: Move lints in methods module to their own modules and some function to methods/utils.rs.
search_is_some: add checking for `is_none()`
fixes: #6815
changelog: search_is_some: add checking for `is_none()`.
To be honest I don't know what is the process of renaming the lints. Appreciate any feedback if that needs to be handled differently. Thanks!
Fix bad suggestion for `match_single_binding` lint
Fix a bad suggestion that needs curly braces when the target `match` is the body of an arm.
Fixes#6572
changelog: none
`match_wildcard` improvements
fixes: #6604fixes: #5733fixes: #6862#5733 is only fixed in the normal case, if different paths are used for the variants then the same problem will occur. It's cause by `def_path_str` returning an utterly useless result. I haven't dug into why yet.
For #6604 there should be some discussion before accepting this. It's easy enough to change the message rather than disable the lint for `Option` and `Result`.
changelog: Attempt to find a common path prefix for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
changelog: Don't lint op `Option` and `Result` for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
changelog: Consider `or` patterns and `Self` prefix for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
Deprecate `intrinsics::drop_in_place` and `collections::Bound`, which accidentally weren't deprecated
Fixes#82080.
I've taken the liberty of updating the `since` values to 1.52, since an unobservable deprecation isn't much of a deprecation (even the detailed release notes never bothered to mention these deprecations).
As mentioned in the issue I'm *pretty* sure that using a type alias for `Bound` is semantically equivalent to the re-export; [the reference implies](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/type-aliases.html) that type aliases only observably differ from types when used on unit structs or tuple structs, whereas `Bound` is an enum.
ast/hir: Rename field-related structures
I always forget what `ast::Field` and `ast::StructField` mean despite working with AST for long time, so this PR changes the naming to less confusing and more consistent.
- `StructField` -> `FieldDef` ("field definition")
- `Field` -> `ExprField` ("expression field", not "field expression")
- `FieldPat` -> `PatField` ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Various visiting and other methods working with the fields are renamed correspondingly too.
The second commit reduces the size of `ExprKind` by boxing fields of `ExprKind::Struct` in preparation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80080.
Don't lint on `Result` and `Option` types.
Considers `or` patterns.
Considers variants prefixed with `Self`
Suggestions will try to find a common prefix rather than just using the full path
Write literal suggestion
fixes: #6768
changelog: Add suggestion to `write_literal` and `print_literal` lints
changelog: Change `use_debug` to point only at the format string
StructField -> FieldDef ("field definition")
Field -> ExprField ("expression field", not "field expression")
FieldPat -> PatField ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Also rename visiting and other methods working on them.
wrong_self_convention: fix lint in case of `to_*_mut` method
fixes#6758
changelog: wrong_self_convention: fix lint in case of `to_*_mut` method. When a method starts with `to_` and ends with `_mut`, clippy expects a `&mut self` parameter, otherwise `&self`.
Any feedback is welcome. I was also thinking if shouldn't we treat `to_` the same way as `as_`. Namely to accept `self` taken: `&self` or `&mut self`.
replace span_lint with span_lint_and_sugg along with error message
fixes: #6874
changelog: none
apologies if this may not be the most idiomatic way of doing it, any advice on changes (if any) would be greatly appreciated.
mem_replace_with_default: recognize some std library ctors
fixes#6562
changelog: mem_replace_with_default: recognize some common constructors equivalent to `Default::default()`
Fix suggestion for `explicit_deref_methods`. Sometimes `&**` is needed, sometimes nothing is needed.
Allow `explicit_deref_methods` to trigger in a few new contexts.
`explicit_deref_methods` will now consider ufcs calls
inconsistent_struct_constructor: try to make message and lint description a bit clearer
changelog: inconsistent_struct_constructor: try to make message and lint description a bit clearer
r? `@ghost`
Fix false positives on procedural macros of `missing_inline_in_public_items` lint
Fixes#6486.
changelog: Fix false positives on procedural macros of `missing_inline_in_public_items` lint.
Improve needless_borrowed_ref docs
changelog: none
I think "borrowed ref" is a confusing description for this lint. Destructuring a reference is the opposite of borrowing. So I updated the wording throughout the docs. Unfortunately this nit applies to the name of the lint itself, but I won't bother changing that. One motivation for these changes is to clarify the difference between this lint and `needless_borrow` (they are actually quite different). Let me know if I need to clarify anything or if you disagree with any changes.
Refactor casts lint
Ref: #6724
Changes:
1. Separate the `casts` group from the `types` group.
2. Reorganize the lints of the `casts` group into their own modules.
Notes:
1. I didn't `fix` #6874 in order to maintain this PR as small as possible.
---
changelog: none
or-patterns: disallow in `let` bindings
~~Blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81869~~
Disallows top-level or-patterns before type ascription. We want to reserve this syntactic space for possible future generalized type ascription.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Opt-in to rustc_private for `rust-analyzer`
rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer#7891
changelog: none
This will also help priroda and any other package which depends on the `miri` library crate.
This gets rid of the following paths:
* OS_STRING
* TO_OWNED
* TO_STRING
Also removes some usages of:
* PATH_BUF
And the now completely unused `clippy_lints::types::is_ty_param_path`
Fix `manual_map` false positives
fixes: #6795fixes: #6797fixes: #6811fixes: #6819
changelog: Fix false positives for `manual_map` when `return`, `break`, `continue`, `yield`, `await`, and partially moved values are used.
changelog: Don't expand macros in suggestions for `manual_map`
Fix false positive for unit_arg lint
Fixes#6447
To avoid false positives don't complain about unit args when they come from a path expression, e.g. a local variable.
**Note:** This is my first contribution to Clippy, so I might have messed up somewhere. Any feedback is welcome and I'm happy to work out any kinks.
---
changelog: Do not lint unit arguments when they come from a path expression.
or_fun_call: fix suggestion for `or_insert(vec![])`
fixes#6748
changelog: or_fun_call: fix suggestion for `or_insert(vec![])` on `std::collections::hash_map::Entry` or `std::collections::btree_map::Entry`
Applies for `std::collections::hash_map::Entry` and `std::collections::btree_map::Entry`
Example:
Previously, for the following code:
`let _ = hash_map.entry("test".to_owned()).or_insert(vec![]);`
clippy would suggest to use:
`or_insert_with(vec![])`, which causes a compiler error (E0277).
Now clippy suggests:
`or_insert_with(Vec::new)`
move upper_case_acronyms back to style, but make the default behaviour less aggressive by default (can be unleashed via config option)
Previous discussion in the bi-weekly clippy meeting for reference: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Meeting.202021-02-23/near/227458019
Move the `upper_case_acronyms` lint back to the style group.
Only warn on fully-capitalized names by default.
Add add a clippy-config option `upper-case-acronyms-aggressive: true/false` to enabled more aggressive linting on
all substrings that could be capitalized acronyms.
---
changelog: reenable upper_case_acronyms by default but make the more aggressive linting opt-in via config option
Moves the lint back from pedantic to style group.
The lint default now only warns on names that are completely capitalized, like "WORD"
and only if the name is longer than 2 chars (so that names where each of the letter represents a word are still distinguishable).
For example: FP (false positive) would still be "valid" and not warned about (but EOF would warn).
A "upper_case_acronyms_aggressive: true/false" config option was added that restores the original lint behaviour to warn
on any kind of camel case name that had more than one capital letter following another capital letter.
The lint does point out inconsistency with the Rust naming convention,
but the fact that rustc does not warn about the inconsistency by default
means that clippy probably should not warn by default either.
changelog: move upper_case_acronyms lint from style to pedantic group.
Inconsistent struct constructor
fixes: #6352
r? `@matthiaskrgr`
I added the lint that checks for the struct constructors where the order of the field init shorthands is inconsistent with that in the struct definition.
changelog: Add style lint: `inconsistent_struct_constructor`
Fix FP in inherent_to_string when the function has generic parameters
Minimal example of the false positive:
````
struct G;
impl G {
fn to_string<const _N: usize>(&self) -> String {
"G.to_string()".to_string()
}
}
fn main() {
let g = G;
g.to_string::<1>();
}
````
Clippy emits an `inherent_to_string` warning, and suggests that we implement `Display` for `G` instead. However, this is not possible, since the generic parameter _N only exists in this function, not in `G` itself. This particular example uses const generics, which is where the issue is most likely to come up, but this PR skips the lint if the `to_string` function has any kind of generic parameters.
changelog: Fix FP in `inherent_to_string`
Change unnecessary_wraps to pedantic
changelog: Change unnecessary_wraps to pedantic
There seems to be enough evidence that this lint is not wanted as warn-by-default. Attempted before at #6380. False positives at #6721 and #6427. Actually requested to change the category at #6726.
Closes#6726
Teach SpanlessEq binding IDs
changelog: Fix collapsible_match false positive
Fixes#6740
This PR changes the way `SpanlessEq` determines whether two local variables are the same. Instead of checking that the names match, it checks that the `HirId`s match. If local bindings are declared within the expressions that are being compared, `SpanlessEq` will remember bindings that correspond to each other in a `FxHashMap<HirId, HirId>`. This makes `SpanlessEq` more flexible while also fixing false positives.
Example: `{ let x = 1; x + 2 }` is equal to `{ let y = 1; y + 2 }`.
CC `@xFrednet` I think this will resolve some concerns in #6463
Add the from_str_radix_10 lint
changelog: added the new `from_str_radix_10` which sometimes replaces calls to `primitive::from_str_radix` to `str::parse`
This is ready to be merged, although maybe the category should be `pedantic` instead of `style`? I'm not sure where it fits better.
Closes#6713.
ast: Keep expansion status for out-of-line module items
I.e. whether a module `mod foo;` is already loaded from a file or not.
This is a pre-requisite to correctly treating inner attributes on such modules (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81661).
With this change AST structures for `mod` items diverge even more for AST structure for the crate root, which previously used `ast::Mod`.
Therefore this PR removes `ast::Mod` from `ast::Crate` in the first commit, these two things are sufficiently different from each other, at least at syntactic level.
Customization points for visiting a "`mod` item or crate root" were also removed from AST visitors (`fn visit_mod`).
`ast::Mod` itself was refactored away in the second commit in favor of `ItemKind::Mod(Unsafe, ModKind)`.
Fix for issue 6640
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: unnecessary_wraps will now suggest to remove unnecessary wrapped return unit type, like Option<()>
fixes#6640
Replace if-let and while-let with `if let` and `while let`
This pull request replaces if-let and while-let with `if let` and `while let`.
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82205
New lint: default_numeric_fallback
fixes#6064
r? `@flip1995`
As we discussed in [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Issue.20.236064/near/224647188) and [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Issue.20clippy.236064/near/224746333), I start implementing this lint from the strictest version.
In this PR, I'll allow the below two cases to pass the lint to reduce FPs.
1. Appearances of unsuffixed numeric literals in `Local` if `Local` has a type annotation, for example:
```rust
// Good.
let x: i32 = 1;
// Also good.
let x: (i32, i32) = if cond {
(1, 2)
} else {
(2, 3)
};
```
2. Appearances of unsuffixed numeric literals in args of `Call` or `MethodCall` if corresponding arguments of their signature have concrete types, for example:
```rust
fn foo_mono(x: i32) -> i32 {
x
}
fn foo_poly<T>(t: T) -> t {
t
}
// Good.
let x = foo_mono(13);
// Still bad.
let x: i32 = foo_poly(13);
```
changelog: Added restriction lint: `default_numeric_fallback`
Do not lint when the closure is called using an iterator
Fix FP when the closure is used in an iterator for `blocks_in_if_conditions` lint
FIxes: #1141
changelog: none
Rework use_self impl based on ty::Ty comparison #3410 | Take 2
This builds on top of #5531
I already reviewed and approved the commits by `@montrivo.` So only the review of my commits should be necessary.
I would also appreciate your review `@montrivo,` since you are familiar with the challenges here.
Fixes#3410 and Fixes#4143 (same problem)
Fixes#2843Fixes#3859Fixes#4734 and fixes#6221Fixes#4305Fixes#5078 (even at expression level now 🎉)
Fixes#3881 and Fixes#4887 (same problem)
Fixes#3909
Not yet: #4140 (test added)
All the credit for the fixes goes to `@montrivo.` I only refactored and copy and pasted his code.
changelog: rewrite [`use_self`] lint and fix multiple (8) FPs. One to go.
Fix suggestions that need parens in `from_iter_instead_of_collect` lint
Fixes broken suggestions that need parens (i.e.: range)
Fixes: #6648
changelog: none
This renames the variants in HIR UnOp from
enum UnOp {
UnDeref,
UnNot,
UnNeg,
}
to
enum UnOp {
Deref,
Not,
Neg,
}
Motivations:
- This is more consistent with the rest of the code base where most enum
variants don't have a prefix.
- These variants are never used without the `UnOp` prefix so the extra
`Un` prefix doesn't help with readability. E.g. we don't have any
`UnDeref`s in the code, we only have `UnOp::UnDeref`.
- MIR `UnOp` type variants don't have a prefix so this is more
consistent with MIR types.
- "un" prefix reads like "inverse" or "reverse", so as a beginner in
rustc code base when I see "UnDeref" what comes to my mind is
something like "&*" instead of just "*".
disallowed_methods: Support functions in addition to methods
## Context:
Hey all! I have a particular use case where I'd like to ban certain functions in a code base I work on. For example, I want to ban `Instant::now()` (among others) as we have a time service for mocking time in deterministic simulation tests. Obviously, it doesn't make sense to include a lint like this for all clippy users. Imagine my excitement when I spotted the new `disallowed_methods` lint in clippy--perfect! Unfortunately, after playing around with it for a bit, I was frustrated to realize that it didn't support functions like `Instant::now()`, so I've added support for them in this PR.
It might also make sense to rename the lint from `disallowed_methods` -> `disallowed_functions`, though I've held off from including that rename in this change, since I'm unsure of clippy's breaking change policy.
## Change
Support functions in addition to methods. In other words, support:
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::new"]` (a function) in addition to
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::leak"]` (a method).
Improve the documentation to clarify that users must specify the full qualified path for each disallowed function, which can be confusing for reexports. Include an example `clippy.toml`.
Simplify the actual lint pass so we can reuse `utils::fn_def_id`.
changelog: disallowed_method: Now supports functions in addition to methods
Add new lint `filter_map_identity`
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only includes internal changes, you can just write
`changelog: none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR.
-->
This commit adds a new lint named filter_map_identity.
This lint is the same as `flat_map_identity` except that it checks for the usage of `filter_map`.
---
Closes#6643
changelog: Added a new lint: `filter_map_identity`
Adds a new lint that checks if there is a semicolon on the last block statement if it returns nothing
changelog: Added a new lint: `SEMICOLON_IF_NOTHING_RETURNED`
fixes#6467
Adds the `SEMICOLON_IF_NOTHING_RETURNED` lint and therefore closes#6467.
Cleanup path-to-local checks
changelog: none
It seemed like too much ceremony going on to check if an expression matches a variable. So I created two util functions `path_to_local(Expr) -> Option<HirId>` and `path_to_local_id(Expr, HirId) -> bool` to make this easier, and used them wherever applicable.
I changed logic in a few places to use `HirId` instead of `Symbol` where it was easy to do so. I believe this is more correct and may even fix some bugs.
I also removed some calls to `qpath_res`. This is not needed if you are only looking for a `Res::Local`.
As a note, I wanted to name the util functions in a way that encourages understanding of the HIR.
Refactor `PrimitiveTypeTable` for Clippy
I removed `PrimitiveTypeTable` and added `PrimTy::ALL` and `PrimTy::from_name` in its place. This allows Clippy to use `PrimTy::from_name` for the `builtin_type_shadow` lint, and a `const` list of primitive types is deleted from Clippy code (the goal). All changes should be a little faster, if anything.
This commit adds a new lint named `filter_map_identity`. This lint is
the same as `flat_map_identity` except that it checks for `filter_map`.
Closes#6643
In other words, support:
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::new"]` (a free function) in
addition to
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::leak"]` (a method).
Improve the documentation to clarify that users must specify the full
qualified path for each disallowed function, which can be confusing for
reexports. Include an example `clippy.toml`.
Simplify the actual lint pass so we can reuse `utils::fn_def_id`.
New Lint: Manual Flatten
This is a draft PR for [Issue 6564](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6564).
r? `@camsteffen`
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Add new lint [`manual_flatten`] to check for loops over a single `if let` expression with `Result` or `Option`.
