Stabilize by-value `[T; N]` iterator `core::array::IntoIter`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65798
This is unblocked now that `min_const_generics` has been stabilized in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79135.
This PR does *not* include the corresponding `IntoIterator` impl, which is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65819. Instead, an iterator can be constructed through the `new` method.
`new` would become unnecessary when `IntoIterator` is implemented and might be deprecated then, although it will stay stable.
Implement missing `AsMut<str>` for `str`
Allows `&mut str` to be taken by a Generic which requires `T` such that `T: AsMut<str>`. Motivating example:
```rust
impl<'i, T> From<T> for StructImmut<'i> where
T: AsRef<str> + 'i,
{
fn from(asref: T) -> Self {
let string: &str = asref.as_ref();
// ...
}
}
impl<'i, T> From<T> for StructMut<'i> where
T: AsMut<str> + 'i,
{
fn from(mut asmut: T) -> Self {
let string: &mut str = asmut.as_mut();
// ...
}
}
```
The Immutable form of this structure can be constructed by `StructImmut::from(s)` where `s` may be a `&String` or a `&str`, because `AsRef<str>` is implemented for `str`. However, the mutable form of the structure can be constructed in the same way **only** with a `&mut String`, and **not** with a `&mut str`.
This change does have some precedent, because as can be seen in [the Implementors](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.AsMut.html#implementors), `AsMut<[T]>` is implemented for `[T]` as well as for `Vec<T>`, but `AsMut<str>` is implemented only for `String`. This would complete the symmetry.
As a trait implementation, this should be immediately stable.
stabilise `cargo test -- --include-ignored`
stabilise `cargo test -- --include-ignored`
On stable there's no way to run ignored tests as well as the normal tests.
An example use case where stabilising this would help:
Exercism has some initial tests and then some additional ignored tests that people run currently with --ignore but currently they can't run all the tests in one go without being on nightly. It would be a little more ergonomic if this flag was stablilised.
( Fixes #65770 )
I built with ./x.py build -i library/test - but as libtest is a dylib is there an easy way to invoke it manually to check it's working as expected? (I've updated the automated tests.)
Revert dist-x86_64-linux update to Clang 11
This reverts commit cb6787ae82, reversing changes made to 0248c6f178.
The change causes errors when linking rustc shared objects with the binutils linker.
Fixes#81554.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
clashing_extern_declarations: Use symbol interning to avoid string alloc.
Use symbol interning as a hack to avoid allocating a string for every symbol name we store in the seen set. This hopefully addresses the minor perf regression described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80009#issuecomment-763526902.
r? `@nagisa`
Update dist-various to Ubuntu 20.04
This updates the dist-various-1 and dist-various-2 images to Ubuntu
20.04. This requires some adjustments:
* `DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive` required for apt install.
* `team-gcc-argm-embedded` PPA does not support focal. However,
we can simply use the distro-provided `gcc-arm-none-eabi`. Per
the comment, the PPA was only used to get a newer version.
* rumprun has to be updated to avoid a linker error.
* We need to build rumrun with `NOGCCERROR`, which disables use
of `-Werror` and allows building with a newer compiler.
* We need to install `libtinfo5`, which appears to be a dependency
of the clang used during the fuchsia build.
* We need to switch to `g++-8` rather than `g++-7`, as at least
`g++-7-arm-linux-gnueabi` is not available on focal.
* We need to upgrade to GCC 6.5 for the Solaris build, as GCC 6.4
does not support the newer libisl version.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Don't clone LLVM submodule when download-ci-llvm is set
Previously, `downloading_llvm` would check `self.build` while it was
still an empty string, and think it was always false. This fixes the
check.
This addresses the worst part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76653. There are still some large submodules being downloaded (in particular, `rustc-by-example` is 146 MB, and all the submodules combined are 311 MB), but this is a lot better than the whopping 1.4 GB before.
Don't print error output from rustup when detecting default build triple
Before, it could print this error if no toolchain was configured:
```
error: no default toolchain configured
error: backtrace:
error: stack backtrace:
0: error_chain::backtrace:👿:InternalBacktrace::new
1: rustup::config::Cfg::toolchain_for_dir
2: rustup_init::run_rustup_inner
3: rustup_init::main
4: std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}}
5: main
6: __libc_start_main
7: _start
```
rustdoc: Remove unnecessary optional
Previously, the HTML output format was represented by both
`Some(OutputFormat::Html)` and `None` so there's no need to have an
optional. Instead, `OutputFormat::Html` is explicitly the default and we
no longer have a "tri-state enum".
r? `````@GuillaumeGomez`````
cfg(version): treat nightlies as complete
This PR makes cfg(version) treat the nightlies
for version 1.n.0 as 1.n.0, even though that nightly
version might not have all stabilizations and features
of the released 1.n.0. This is done for greater
convenience for people who want to test a newly
stabilized feature on nightly, or in other words,
give newly stabilized features as many eyeballs
as possible.
For users who wish to pin nightlies, this commit adds
a -Z assume-incomplete-release option that they can
enable if they run into any issues due to this change.
Implements the suggestion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64796#issuecomment-640851454
Slight simplification of chars().count()
Slight simplification: No need to call len(), we can just count the number of non continuation bytes.
I can't see any reason not to do this, can you?
Support FRU pattern with `[feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]`
In case of a functional record update syntax for creating a structure, `ExprUseVisitor` to only detect the precise use of some of the field in the `..x` part of the syntax. However, when we start building MIR, we
1. First, build the place for `x`
2. and then, add precise field projections so that only some parts of `x` end up getting read.
When `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled, and FRU is used within a closure `x` won't be completely captured, and therefore the first step will fail. This PR updates `mir_build` to create a place builder in the first step and then create place from the builder only after applying the field projection.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/32
r? ``````@nikomatsakis``````
Stabilize `unsigned_abs`
Resolves#74913.
This PR stabilizes the `i*::unsigned_abs()` method, which returns the absolute value of an integer _as its unsigned equivalent_. This has the advantage that it does not overflow on `i*::MIN`.
I have gone ahead and used this in a couple locations throughout the repository.
Stabilize raw ref macros
This stabilizes `raw_ref_macros` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73394), which is possible now that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74355 is fixed.
However, as I already said in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73394#issuecomment-751342185, I am not particularly happy with the current names of the macros. So I propose we also change them, which means I am proposing to stabilize the following in `core::ptr`:
```rust
pub macro const_addr_of($e:expr) {
&raw const $e
}
pub macro mut_addr_of($e:expr) {
&raw mut $e
}
```
The macro name change means we need another round of FCP. Cc `````@rust-lang/libs`````
Fixes#73394
Consider Scalar to be a bool only if its unsigned
This seems right, given that conceptually bools are unsigned, but the
implications of this change may have more action at distance that I'm
not sure how to exhaustively consider.
For instance there are a number of cases where code attaches range
metadata if `scalar.is_bool()` holds. Supposedly it would no longer be
attached to the `repr(i8)` enums? Though I'm not sure why booleans are
being special-cased here in the first place...
Fixes#80556
cc `@eddyb`
Add `core::stream::Stream`
[[Tracking issue: #79024](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79024)]
This patch adds the `core::stream` submodule and implements `core::stream::Stream` in accordance with [RFC2996](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2996). The RFC hasn't been merged yet, but as requested by the libs team in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2996#issuecomment-725696389 I'm filing this PR to get the ball rolling.
## Documentatation
The docs in this PR have been adapted from [`std::iter`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/index.html), [`async_std::stream`](https://docs.rs/async-std/1.7.0/async_std/stream/index.html), and [`futures::stream::Stream`](https://docs.rs/futures/0.3.8/futures/stream/trait.Stream.html). Once this PR lands my plan is to follow this up with PRs to add helper methods such as `stream::repeat` which can be used to document more of the concepts that are currently missing. That will allow us to cover concepts such as "infinite streams" and "laziness" in more depth.
## Feature gate
The feature gate for `Stream` is `stream_trait`. This matches the `#[lang = "future_trait"]` attribute name. The intention is that only the APIs defined in RFC2996 will use this feature gate, with future additions such as `stream::repeat` using their own feature gates. This is so we can ensure a smooth path towards stabilizing the `Stream` trait without needing to stabilize all the APIs in `core::stream` at once. But also don't start expanding the API until _after_ stabilization, as was the case with `std::future`.
__edit:__ the feature gate has been changed to `async_stream` to match the feature gate proposed in the RFC.
## Conclusion
This PR introduces `core::stream::{Stream, Next}` and re-exports it from `std` as `std::stream::{Stream, Next}`. Landing `Stream` in the stdlib has been a mult-year process; and it's incredibly exciting for this to finally happen!
---
r? `````@KodrAus`````
cc/ `````@rust-lang/wg-async-foundations````` `````@rust-lang/libs`````
Update Python and Clang on x86 dist images
LLVM 12 no longer builds with Python 2, so install Python 3 in
preparation for the upgrade (#81451).
However, Clang 10 does not build with Python 3, so we need update
to Clang 11 as well, which supports both.
Unfortunately, doing so results in errors while linking the
libLLVM.so into other binaries:
> __morestack: invalid needed version 2
This is fixed by using LLD instead. Possibly this is due to a binutils
linker bug, but updating to the latest binutils version does not fix
it.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
cc `@cuviper`
rustdoc tweaking
* Reuse memory
* simplify `next_def_id`, avoid multiple hashing and unnecessary lookups
* remove `all_fake_def_ids`, use the global map instead (probably not a good step toward parallelization, though...)
* convert `add_deref_target` to iterative implementation
* use `ArrayVec` where we know the max number of elements
* minor touchups here and there
* avoid building temporary vectors that get appended to other vectors
At most places I may or may not be doing the compiler's job is this PR.
* Reuse memory
* simplify `next_def_id`, avoid multiple hashing and unnecessary lookups
* remove `all_fake_def_ids`, use the global map instead (probably not a good step toward parallelization, though...)
* convert `add_deref_target` to iterative implementation
* use `ArrayVec` where we know the max number of elements
* minor touchups here and there
* avoid building temporary vectors that get appended to other vectors
At most places I may or may not be doing the compiler's job is this PR.
This seems right, given that conceptually bools are unsigned, but the
implications of this change may have more action at distance that I'm
not sure how to exhaustively consider.
For instance there are a number of cases where code attaches range
metadata if `scalar.is_bool()` holds. Supposedly it would no longer be
attached to the `repr(i8)` enums? Though I'm not sure why booleans are
being special-cased here in the first place...
Fixes#80556
This updates the dist-various-1 and dist-various-2 images to Ubuntu
20.04. This requires some adjustments:
* `DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive` required for apt install.
* `team-gcc-argm-embedded` PPA does not support focal. However,
we can simply use the distro-provided `gcc-arm-none-eabi`. Per
the comment, the PPA was only used to get a newer version.
* rumprun has to be updated to avoid a linker error.
* We need to build rumrun with `NOGCCERROR`, which disables use
of `-Werror` and allows building with a newer compiler.
* We need to install `libtinfo5`, which appears to be a dependency
of the clang used during the fuchsia build.
* We need to switch to `g++-8` rather than `g++-7`, as at least
`g++-7-arm-linux-gnueabi` is not available on focal.
* We need to upgrade to GCC 6.5 for the Solaris build, as GCC 6.4
does not support the newer libisl version.
Before, it could print this error if no toolchain was configured:
```
error: no default toolchain configured
error: backtrace:
error: stack backtrace:
0: error_chain::backtrace:👿:InternalBacktrace::new
1: rustup::config::Cfg::toolchain_for_dir
2: rustup_init::run_rustup_inner
3: rustup_init::main
4: std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}}
5: main
6: __libc_start_main
7: _start
```
Avoid memory allocation when removing dead blocks
Use `reachable_as_bitset` to reuse a bitset from the traversal rather
than allocating it seprately. Additionally check if there are any
unreachable blocks before proceeding.
Pre-canoncalize ExternLocation::ExactPaths
This stores pre-canacolized paths inside `ExternLocation::ExactPaths` so that we don't need to canoncalize them every time we want to compare them to source lib paths.
This is related to #81414.
This commit makes cfg(version) treat the nightlies
for version 1.n.0 as 1.n.0, even though that nightly
version might not have all stabilizations and features
of the released 1.n.0. This is done for greater
convenience for people who want to test a newly
stabilized feature on nightly.
For users who wish to pin nightlies, this commit adds
a -Z assume-incomplete-release option that they can
enable if there are any issues due to this change.
