Support `cargo dev bless` for tests with revisions
changelog: internal: Support `cargo dev bless` for tests with revisions
Previously bless wouldn't pick up the saved stderr from `target/debug/tests/manual_assert.stage-id.edition2021.stderr` or `target/debug/tests/manual_assert.stage-id.edition2018.stderr` due to there being multiple revisions of the test output
This tweaks compile-test so the built files end up in e.g. `target/debug/tests/ui`, `target/debug/tests/ui-cargo` rather than share the `tests` dir. `cargo dev bless` then uses that to update all the `.stdout/stdout/fixed` files it can find
Also removes an empty file I found, and the logic to remove empty outputs as compiletest doesn't produce empty `.stdout/stderr` files
Factor out several utils, add `path_def_id`
changelog: none
This is generally an effort to reduce the total number of utils. `path_def_id` is added which I believe is more "cross-cutting" and also complements `path_to_local`. Best reviewed one commit at a time.
Added:
* `path_def_id`
* `path_res`
Removed:
* `is_qpath_def_path`
* `match_any_diagnostic_items`
* `expr_path_res`
* `single_segment_path`
* `differing_macro_contexts`
* `is_ty_param_lang_item`
* `is_ty_param_diagnostic_item`
* `get_qpath_generics`
Renamed:
* `path_to_res` to `def_path_res`
* `get_qpath_generic_tys` to `qpath_generic_tys`
CC `@Jarcho` since this relates to some of your work and you may have input.
warn if we find multiple clippy configs
Fixes#8323
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: warn if we find multiple clippy configs
Add lint `transmute_undefined_repr`
Partially implements #3999 and #546
This doesn't consider `enum`s at all right now as those are going to be a pain to deal with. This also allows `#[repr(Rust)]` structs with only one non-zero sized fields. I think those are technically undefined when transmuted.
changelog: Add lint `transmute_undefined_repr`
Add `explicit_write` suggestions for `write!`s with format args
changelog: Add [`explicit_write`] suggestions for `write!`s with format args
Fixes#4542
```rust
writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();
```
Now suggests:
```
error: use of `writeln!(stderr(), ...).unwrap()`
--> $DIR/explicit_write.rs:36:9
|
LL | writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `eprintln!("macro arg {}", one!())`
```
---------
r? `@camsteffen` (again, sorry 😛) for the `FormatArgsExpn` change
Before this change `inputs_span` returned a span pointing to just `1` in
```rust
macro_rules! one {
() => { 1 };
}
`writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();`
```
And the `source_callsite` of that span didn't include the format string, it was just `one!()`
make unwrap_used also trigger on .get().unwrap()
fixes#8124
changelog: make the [unwrap_used] lint trigger for code of the form such as `.get(i).unwrap()` and `.get_mut(i).unwrap()`
[explicit_counter_loop] suggests `.into_iter()`, despite that triggering [into_iter_on_ref] in some cases
I have modified `fn make_iterator_snippet` in clippy_lints/src/loops/utils.rs ,so this change has some little influence on another lint [manual_flatten] .
fixes#8155
---
changelog: Fix that [`explicit_counter_loop`] suggests `into_iter()` despite that triggering [`into_iter_on_ref`] in some cases
Format `if_chain` invocations in clippy_utils
Not realizing it was [already obsolete](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8360), I built a [tool to format inside `if_chain` invocations](https://crates.io/crates/rustfmt_if_chain).
This PR applies the tool to clippy_utils. (If you apply it to clippy_lints, the changes are extensive.)
Anyway, I'm making it known here in case anyone wants to use it while `if-let` chain support is developed for `rustfmt`. (There could be a few Clippy PRs between now and then, and IMHO, the code looks better with the `if_chain` invocations formatted.)
Cheers.
---
changelog: none
single_match: Don't lint non-exhaustive matches; support tuples
`single_match` lint:
* Don't lint exhaustive enum patterns without a wild.
Rationale: The definition of the enum could be changed, so the user can get non-exhaustive match after applying the suggested lint (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8282#issuecomment-1013566068 for context).
* Lint `match` constructions with tuples (as suggested at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8282#issuecomment-1015621148)
Closes#8282
---
changelog: [`single_match`]: Don't lint exhaustive enum patterns without a wild.
changelog: [`single_match`]: Lint `match` constructions with tuples
