Commit Graph

18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeffrey Seyfried
da41e583d6 Fix fallout in tests 2016-03-30 22:00:48 +00:00
Alex Crichton
760b93adc0 Fallout from the libcollections movement 2014-06-05 13:55:11 -07:00
Richo Healey
1f1b2e42d7 std: Rename strbuf operations to string
[breaking-change]
2014-05-27 12:59:31 -07:00
Richo Healey
553074506e core: rename strbuf::StrBuf to string::String
[breaking-change]
2014-05-24 21:48:10 -07:00
Patrick Walton
95e310abdc test: Remove all uses of ~str from the test suite. 2014-05-14 14:58:00 -07:00
Richo Healey
919889a1d6 Replace all ~"" with "".to_owned() 2014-04-18 17:25:34 -07:00
kud1ing
871ffd1c05 more backticks 2014-01-12 10:35:10 +01:00
Graydon Hoare
d1affff623 Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup. 2012-12-10 17:32:58 -08:00
Michael Sullivan
6822ec3eb4 Treat bare vector and string literals as fixed length vecs. Closes #2922. 2012-07-14 14:30:48 -07:00
Michael Sullivan
f5e69d611e Change the pretty printer to print vstores for strs in prefix notation. 2012-07-13 17:03:54 -07:00
Michael Sullivan
7b26503566 Make str be treated as str/~. 2012-07-12 00:21:04 -07:00
Brian Anderson
6217ce958e Print the type of istrs as 'str' in error messages. Issue #855 2011-09-02 22:11:46 -07:00
Brian Anderson
913667ba25 Fix the error-patterns in 2 cfail tests. Issue #855 2011-09-01 17:19:36 -07:00
Brian Anderson
518dc52f85 Reformat
This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to
[] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-20 11:04:00 -07:00
Brian Anderson
c53402846e Remove all xfail-stage0 directives
While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any
of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody
should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-08-03 10:55:59 -07:00
Marijn Haverbeke
df7f21db09 Reformat for new syntax 2011-07-27 15:54:33 +02:00
Brian Anderson
2573fe7026 The Big Test Suite Overhaul
This replaces the make-based test runner with a set of Rust-based test
runners. I believe that all existing functionality has been
preserved. The primary objective is to dogfood the Rust test
framework.

A few main things happen here:

1) The run-pass/lib-* tests are all moved into src/test/stdtest. This
is a standalone test crate intended for all standard library tests. It
compiles to build/test/stdtest.stageN.

2) rustc now compiles into yet another build artifact, this one a test
runner that runs any tests contained directly in the rustc crate. This
allows much more fine-grained unit testing of the compiler. It
compiles to build/test/rustctest.stageN.

3) There is a new custom test runner crate at src/test/compiletest
that reproduces all the functionality for running the compile-fail,
run-fail, run-pass and bench tests while integrating with Rust's test
framework. It compiles to build/test/compiletest.stageN.

4) The build rules have been completely changed to use the new test
runners, while also being less redundant, following the example of the
recent stageN.mk rewrite.

It adds two new features to the cfail/rfail/rpass/bench tests:

1) Tests can specify multiple 'error-pattern' directives which must be
satisfied in order.

2) Tests can specify a 'compile-flags' directive which will make the
test runner provide additional command line arguments to rustc.

There are some downsides, the primary being that Rust has to be
functioning pretty well just to run _any_ tests, which I imagine will
be the source of some frustration when the entire test suite
breaks. Will also cause some headaches during porting.

Not having individual make rules, each rpass, etc test no longer
remembers between runs whether it completed successfully. As a result,
it's not possible to incrementally fix multiple tests by just running
'make check', fixing a test, and repeating without re-running all the
tests contained in the test runner. Instead you can filter just the
tests you want to run by using the TESTNAME environment variable.

This also dispenses with the ability to run stage0 tests, but they
tended to be broken more often than not anyway.
2011-07-24 15:34:34 -07:00
Brian Anderson
cfaa0f4b91 Fail typechecking for bad binop/type combinations
Includes assignment operations. Add regression tests for lots of less useful,
less used or unexpected combinations, as well as a selection of compile-fail
tests. Closes #500 (again!)
2011-06-25 19:42:59 -07:00