This commit adds a "hack" to the session to track whether we're a rustdoc
session or not. If we're rustdoc then we skip the expansion to add the
rustc-macro infrastructure.
Closes#36820
Fix BufRead::read_until documentation.
Second paragraph already fully explains what happens when EOF is
encountered. The third paragraph (removed one) is spurious and
misleading.
Fixed wrong link in release notes
The link for the pull request updating hash_map to implement Debug was a copy of the previous link, this changes the link to the correct PR.
Suggesting a change to a comment that puzzled me
While reading this, the comment made it difficult for me to simply absorb the concept. It interrupted my reading flow, and I think this expresses the same meaning, but reads a bit better. It's trivial, but makes it easier for me to move on to the next line.
add wrapper for discriminant_value, take 2
[This is #34785 reopened, since @bors apparently gave up on that thread.]
add wrapper for discriminant_value intrinsic
Implementation of [RFC 1696](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1696-discriminant.md).
Wraps the `discriminant_value` intrinsic under the name `std::mem::discriminant`. In order to avoid prematurely leaking information about the implementation of enums, the return value is an opaque type, generic over the enum type, which implements Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, and Debug (notably not PartialOrd). There is currently no way to get the value out excepting printing the debug representation.
The wrapper is safe and can be stabilized soon as per discussion in #24263.
cc @aturon
r? @nagisa
Resolve the callee type in check_call before autoderef
If the callee type is an associated type, then it needs to be normalized
before trying to deref it. This matches the behaviour of
`check_method_call` for autoderef behaviour in calls.
Fixes#36786
Clean up hasher discussion on HashMap
* We never want to make guarantees about protecting against attacks.
* "True randomness" is not the right terminology to be using in this
context.
* There is significantly more nuance to the performance of SipHash than
"somewhat slow".
r? @steveklabnik
Follow up to discussion on #35371
