Auto merge of #36557 - sfackler:fix-hashdos-docs, r=alexcrichton

Clean up hasher discussion on HashMap

* We never want to make guarantees about protecting against attacks.
* "True randomness" is not the right terminology to be using in this
    context.
* There is significantly more nuance to the performance of SipHash than
    "somewhat slow".

r? @steveklabnik

Follow up to discussion on #35371
This commit is contained in:
bors 2016-09-29 20:25:45 -07:00 committed by GitHub
commit 7660bdf70a

View File

@ -196,15 +196,29 @@ fn test_resize_policy() {
//
// FIXME(Gankro, pczarn): review the proof and put it all in a separate README.md
/// A hash map implementation which uses linear probing with Robin
/// Hood bucket stealing.
/// A hash map implementation which uses linear probing with Robin Hood bucket
/// stealing.
///
/// By default, HashMap uses a somewhat slow hashing algorithm which can provide resistance
/// to DoS attacks. Rust makes a best attempt at acquiring random numbers without IO
/// blocking from your system. Because of this HashMap is not guaranteed to provide
/// DoS resistance since the numbers generated might not be truly random. If you do
/// require this behavior you can create your own hashing function using
/// [BuildHasherDefault](../hash/struct.BuildHasherDefault.html).
/// By default, `HashMap` uses a hashing algorithm selected to provide
/// resistance against HashDoS attacks. The algorithm is randomly seeded, and a
/// reasonable best-effort is made to generate this seed from a high quality,
/// secure source of randomness provided by the host without blocking the
/// program. Because of this, the randomness of the seed is dependant on the
/// quality of the system's random number generator at the time it is created.
/// In particular, seeds generated when the system's entropy pool is abnormally
/// low such as during system boot may be of a lower quality.
///
/// The default hashing algorithm is currently SipHash 1-3, though this is
/// subject to change at any point in the future. While its performance is very
/// competitive for medium sized keys, other hashing algorithms will outperform
/// it for small keys such as integers as well as large keys such as long
/// strings, though those algorithms will typically *not* protect against
/// attacks such as HashDoS.
///
/// The hashing algorithm can be replaced on a per-`HashMap` basis using the
/// `HashMap::default`, `HashMap::with_hasher`, and
/// `HashMap::with_capacity_and_hasher` methods. Many alternative algorithms
/// are available on crates.io, such as the `fnv` crate.
///
/// It is required that the keys implement the [`Eq`] and [`Hash`] traits, although
/// this can frequently be achieved by using `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]`.