Extract book into a submodule
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39588
We probably don't want to land this till after the beta branches on friday, but would still ❤️ a review from @alexcrichton , since I am a rustbuild noob.
This pr:
1. removes the book
2. adds it back in as a submodule
3. the submodule includes both the old book and the new book
4. it also includes an index page explaining the difference in editions
5. it also includes redirect pages for the old book URLs.
6. so we build all that stuff too.
r? @alexcrichton
Rename TryFrom's associated type and implement str::parse using TryFrom.
Per discussion on the tracking issue, naming `TryFrom`'s associated type `Error` is generally more consistent with similar traits in the Rust ecosystem, and what people seem to assume it should be called. It also helps disambiguate from `Result::Err`, the most common "Err".
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33417#issuecomment-269108968.
`TryFrom<&str>` and `FromStr` are equivalent, so have the latter provide the former to ensure that. Using `TryFrom` in the implementation of `str::parse` means types that implement either trait can use it. When we're ready to stabilize `TryFrom`, we should update `FromStr` to
suggest implementing `TryFrom<&str>` instead for new code.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33417#issuecomment-277175994
and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33417#issuecomment-277253827.
Refs #33417.
Use rls-data crate
This basically pulls out a bunch of data structures used by save-analysis for serialization into an external crate, and pulls that crate in using Rustbuild. The RLS can then share these data structures with the compiler which in some cases will allow more efficient communication between the compiler and the RLS (i.e., without serialisation).
Along the way, I have to pull in rls-span, which is the RLS's way of defining spans (more type-safe than the compiler's built-in way). This is basically just to convert from compiler spans to RLS spans.
I also pull in the crates.io version of rustc-serialize, which is a bit annoying, but seems to be the only way to have serialisable data in an external crate. To make this work, all of the save-analysis crate has to use this version too (cc #40527).
Finally I pull in a line from #40347 to make the unstable crate checking stuff working.
There are a lot of changes to save-analysis but they are all mechanical and trivial - changing from using `From` to `Into` (because of orphan rules) being the main thing.
r? @alexcrichton
macros: improve the `TokenStream` quoter
This PR
- renames the `TokenStream` quoter from `qquote!` to `quote!`,
- uses `$` instead of `unquote` (e.g. `let toks: TokenStream = ...; quote!([$toks])`),
- allows unquoting `Token`s as well as `TokenTree`s and `TokenStream`s (fixes#39746), and
- to preserve syntactic space, requires that `$` be followed by
- a single identifier to unquote, or
- another `$` to produce a literal `$`.
r? @nrc
Implemente overflowing_sh* with new unchecked_sh* intrinsics
Also update some 128 bit builtins to not rely on the constant evaluator to avoid checked operations.
Fixes#40508.
cc @nagisa, @alexcrichton
Note: I still have a build running to see if the 128 bit changes worked (unoptimized builds take *forever* to compile), however at least the overflowing builtins no longer reference `core::panicking::panic`.
Propagate expected type hints through struct literals.
Partial fix for #31260 to maximize backwards-compatibility, i.e. the hint is provided but not coerced to.
The added test works because `{...; x}` with a hint of `T` coerces `x` to `T`, and the reasoning why that is slightly different has to do with DSTs: `&Struct { tail: [x] }: &Struct<[T]>` has a hint of `[T]` for `[x]`, but the inferred type should be `[T; 1]` to succeed later, so `[x]` shouldn't be *forced* to be `[T]`.
*However*, implementing that complete behavior in a backwards-compatible way may be non-trivial, and has not yet been fully investigated, while this PR fixes#40355 and can be backported.
r? @nikomatsakis
Rename TryFrom's associated type and implement str::parse using TryFrom.
Per discussion on the tracking issue, naming `TryFrom`'s associated type `Error` is generally more consistent with similar traits in the Rust ecosystem, and what people seem to assume it should be called. It also helps disambiguate from `Result::Err`, the most common "Err".
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33417#issuecomment-269108968.
`TryFrom<&str>` and `FromStr` are equivalent, so have the latter provide the former to ensure that. Using `TryFrom` in the implementation of `str::parse` means types that implement either trait can use it. When we're ready to stabilize `TryFrom`, we should update `FromStr` to
suggest implementing `TryFrom<&str>` instead for new code.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33417#issuecomment-277175994
and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33417#issuecomment-277253827.
Refs #33417.
Change how the `0` flag works in format!
Now it always implies right-alignment, so that padding zeroes are placed after the sign (if any) and before the digits. In other words, it always takes precedence over explicitly specified `[[fill]align]`. This also affects the '#' flag: zeroes are placed after the prefix (0b, 0o, 0x) and before the digits.
Here's a short summary of how similar format strings work in Python and Rust:
```
:05 :<05 :>05 :^05
Python 3.6 |-0001| |-1000| |000-1| |0-100|
Rust before |-0001| |-1000| |-0001| |-0100|
Rust after |-0001| |-0001| |-0001| |-0001|
:#05x :<#05x :>#05x :^#05x
Python 3.6 |0x001| |0x100| |000x1| |00x10|
Rust before |0x001| |0x100| |000x1| |0x010|
Rust after |0x001| |0x001| |0x001| |0x001|
```
Fixes#39997 [breaking-change]
Fix race condition in fs::create_dir_all
The code would crash if the directory was created after create_dir_all
checked whether the directory already existed. This was contrary to
the documentation which claimed to create the directory if it doesn't
exist, implying (but not stating) that there would not be a failure
due to the directory existing.
Fix a spelling error in HashMap documentation, and slightly reword surrounding text for precision
Noticed while reading docs just now.
It's possible that the prior wording *meant* to state that the seed's randomness depends on the exact instant that the system RNG was created, I guess. But unless there's an API guarantee that this is the case, the wording seems over-precise. Is there a formal API guarantee that would forbid, say, the system RNG from generating all output using the Intel RDRAND instruction? I don't think the quality of output in that case would depend on when the RNG was created. Yet it seems to me like it could well be a valid source of randomness when computing the initial seed.
For that reason, tying the randomness of the seed, to the quality of the RNG's output *at the precise instant the seed is computed*, seems less confining. That instantaneous quality level could be determined by the quality at the instant the RNG was created -- but instantaneous quality need not be low for that precise reason.
minor wording tweak to slice::{as_ptr, as_mut_ptr}
Per #37334, the slice-as-pointer methods mentioned that "modifying the slice may cause its buffer to be reallocated", when in fact modifying the *slice* itself would cause no such change. (It is a borrow, after all!) This is a tweak to the wording of that line to stress it's the *collection* that could cause the buffer to be reallocated.
r? @steveklabnik
Point to let when modifying field of immutable variable
Point at the immutable local variable when trying to modify one of its
fields.
Given a file:
```rust
struct Foo {
pub v: Vec<String>
}
fn main() {
let f = Foo { v: Vec::new() };
f.v.push("cat".to_string());
}
```
present the following output:
```
error: cannot borrow immutable field `f.v` as mutable
--> file.rs:7:13
|
6 | let f = Foo { v: Vec::new() };
| - this should be `mut`
7 | f.v.push("cat".to_string());
| ^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Fix#27593.
Add feature gate for rvalue-static-promotion
Probably needs more tests (which ones?) and there may be other things that need to be done. Also not sure whether the version that introduces the flag is really `1.15.1`.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1414.
Updates #38865.
