Enforce the shadowing restrictions from RFC 1560 for today's macros
This PR enforces a weakened version of the shadowing restrictions from RFC 1560. More specifically,
- If a macro expansion contains a `macro_rules!` macro definition that is used outside of the expansion, the defined macro may not shadow an existing macro.
- If a macro expansion contains a `#[macro_use] extern crate` macro import that is used outside of the expansion, the imported macro may not shadow an existing macro.
This is a [breaking-change]. For example,
```rust
macro_rules! m { () => {} }
macro_rules! n { () => {
macro_rules! m { () => {} } //< This shadows an existing macro.
m!(); //< This is inside the expansion that generated `m`'s definition, so it is OK.
} }
n!();
m!(); //< This use of `m` is outside the expansion, so it causes the shadowing to be an error.
```
r? @nrc
Restrict where in the tree platform-specific cfgs may be mentioned
With the ports of Rust never ending, it's important that we keep things tidy. The main thing this PR does is introduce a new "pal" (platform abstraction layer) tidy check that limits where platform-specific CFGs may appear.
This is intended to maintain existing standards of code organization
in hopes that the standard library will continue to be refactored to
isolate platform-specific bits, making porting easier; where "standard
library" roughly means "all the dependencies of the std and test
crates".
This generally means placing restrictions on where `cfg(unix)`,
`cfg(windows)`, `cfg(target_os)` and `cfg(target_env)` may appear,
the basic objective being to isolate platform-specific code to the
platform-specific `std::sys` modules, and to the allocation,
unwinding, and libc crates.
Following are the basic rules, though there are currently
exceptions:
- core may not have platform-specific code
- liballoc_system may have platform-specific code
- liballoc_jemalloc may have platform-specific code
- libpanic_abort may have platform-specific code
- libpanic_unwind may have platform-specific code
- other crates in the std facade may not
- std may have platform-specific code in the following places
- sys/unix/
- sys/windows/
- os/
There are plenty of exceptions today though, noted in the whitelist.
The end-state, IMO, is for the standard library to be portable by porting only `std::sys` (possibly extracted to its own crate), an allocator crate, an unwinder crate, and possibly a libc crate (if std depends on it); but that outcome is far off and independent of the utility of enforcing where such code lives today.
cc @rust-lang/libs
This is intended to maintain existing standards of code organization
in hopes that the standard library will continue to be refactored to
isolate platform-specific bits, making porting easier; where "standard
library" roughly means "all the dependencies of the std and test
crates".
This generally means placing restrictions on where `cfg(unix)`,
`cfg(windows)`, `cfg(target_os)` and `cfg(target_env)` may appear,
the basic objective being to isolate platform-specific code to the
platform-specific `std::sys` modules, and to the allocation,
unwinding, and libc crates.
Following are the basic rules, though there are currently
exceptions:
- core may not have platform-specific code
- liballoc_system may have platform-specific code
- liballoc_jemalloc may have platform-specific code
- libpanic_abort may have platform-specific code
- libpanic_unwind may have platform-specific code
- other crates in the std facade may not
- std may have platform-specific code in the following places
- sys/unix/
- sys/windows/
- os/
There are plenty of exceptions today though, noted in the whitelist.
Refactor layout to store offsets of fields, not offsets after fields
This is the next PR moving us towards being able to reorder struct fields.
The old code implicitly stored the offset of the first field. This is inadequate because the first field may no longer be offset 0 in future. This PR refactors `layout` to use a `offsets` vector instead of a `offset_after_field` vector.
Documentation change to macros.rs for `includes!`
I'm not sure if this documentation is clear or extensive enough, but this is just to get started on the problem, fixes issue #36387.
This commit makes the return type of AstBuilder.stmt_let_typed match the return type of other AstBuilder.stmt* functions. This avoids unnecessary boxing/unboxing whenever Stmt's are stored in a Vec, which is the default use case.nnThis is a potentially plugin breaking change.
Fix RUSTC_VERSION for 'documenting' build stage.
Previously the `env!("RUSTC_VERSION")` requirement would break the "Documenting rustc_metadata" stage of the rustc build, since that environment variable is only defined during the main build.
r? @eddyb
Working asmjs and wasm targets
This patch set results in a working standard library for the asmjs-unknown-emscripten and wasm32-unknown-emscripten targets. It is based on the work of @badboy and @rschulman.
It does a few things:
- Updates LLVM with the emscripten [fastcomp](https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm/pull/50) patches, which include the pnacl IR legalizer and the asm.js backend. This patch is thought not to have any significant effect on existing targets.
- Teaches rustbuild to correctly link C code with emscripten
- Updates gcc-rs to work correctly with emscripten
- Teaches rustbuild to run crate tests for emscripten with node
- Modifies Thread::new to return an error on emscripten, to facilitate debugging a common failure mode
- Modifies libtest to run in single-threaded mode for emscripten
- Ignores a host of tests that don't work yet, mostly dealing with threads and I/O
- Updates libc with wasm32 definitions (presently the same as asmjs)
- Adds a wasm32-unknown-emscripten target that feeds the output of LLVM's asmjs backend through emcc to generate wasm
Notes and caveats:
- This is only known to work with `--enable-rustbuild`.
- The wasm32 target can't be tested correctly yet because of issues in compiletest and limitations in node https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/issues/4542, but hello.rs does seem to work when run on node via the binaryen interpreter
- This requires an up to date installation of the emscripten sdk from its incoming branch
- Unwinding is very broken
- When enabling the emscripten targets jemalloc is disabled for all targets, which results in test failures for the host
Next steps are to fix the jemalloc issue, start building the two emscripten targets on the auto builders, then start producing nightlies.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36317 tracks work on this.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36515
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36515
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36356
rustc: More fixes for arch-independent hashing
In another attempt to fix#36793 this commit attempts to head off any future
problems by adding a custom `WidentUsizeHasher` which will widen any hashing of
`isize` and `usize` to a `u64` as necessary. This obviates the need for a
previous number of `as u64` annotations and will hopefully protect us against
future problems here.
Closes#36793 (hopefully)
Previously the `env!("RUSTC_VERSION")` requirement would break the
"Documenting rustc_metadata" stage of the rustc build, since that
environment variable is only defined during the main build.
In another attempt to fix#36793 this commit attempts to head off any future
problems by adding a custom `WidentUsizeHasher` which will widen any hashing of
`isize` and `usize` to a `u64` as necessary. This obviates the need for a
previous number of `as u64` annotations and will hopefully protect us against
future problems here.
Closes#36793 (hopefully)
This is a hack to support building targets that don't support jemalloc
alongside hosts that do. The jemalloc build is controlled by a feature
of the std crate, and if that feature changes between targets, it
invalidates the fingerprint of std's build script (this is a cargo
bug); so we must ensure that the feature set used by std is the same
across all targets, which means we have to build the alloc_jemalloc
crate for targets like emscripten, even if we don't use it.
