Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when
evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that
introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at
unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`).
In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls.
We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a
note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like
in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`).
Address part of #89418.
This function parameter attribute was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44866 as an intermediate step in implementing `impl Trait`, it's not necessary or used anywhere by itself.
Fix span for non-satisfied trivial trait bounds
The spans for "trait bound not satisfied" errors in trivial trait bounds referenced the entire item (fn, impl, struct) before.
Now they only reference the obligation itself (`String: Copy`)
Address #90869
Fixes incorrect handling of TraitRefs when emitting suggestions.
Closes#90804 , although there were more issues here that were hidden by the thing that caused this ICE.
Underlying problem was that substitutions were being thrown out, which not only leads to an ICE but also incorrect diagnostics. On top of that, in some cases the self types from the root obligations were being mixed in with those from derived obligations.
This makes a couple diagnostics arguable worse ("`B<C>` does not implement `Copy`" instead of "`C` does not implement `Copy`") but the worse diagnostics are at least still correct and that downside is in my opinion clearly outweighed by the benefits of fixing the ICE and unambiguously wrong diagnostics.
The spans for "trait bound not satisfied" errors in trivial trait bounds referenced the entire item (fn, impl, struct) before.
Now they only reference the obligation itself (`String: Copy`)
Address #90869
When suggesting references, substitutions were being forgotten and some types were misused. This led to at
least one ICE and other incorrectly emitted diagnostics. This has been fixed; in some cases this leads to
diagnostics changing, and tests have been adjusted.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #89561 (Type inference for inline consts)
- #90035 (implement rfc-2528 type_changing-struct-update)
- #90613 (Allow to run a specific rustdoc-js* test)
- #90683 (Make `compiler-docs` only control the default instead of being a hard off-switch)
- #90685 (x.py: remove fixme by deleting code)
- #90701 (Record more artifact sizes during self-profiling.)
- #90723 (Better document `Box` and `alloc::alloc::box_free` connection)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Type inference for inline consts
Fixes#78132Fixes#78174Fixes#81857Fixes#89964
Perform type checking/inference of inline consts in the same context as the outer def, similar to what is currently done to closure.
Doing so would require `closure_base_def_id` of the inline const to return the outer def, and since `closure_base_def_id` can be called on non-local crate (and thus have no HIR available), a new `DefKind` is created for inline consts.
The type of the generated anon const can capture lifetime of outer def, so we couldn't just use the typeck result as the type of the inline const's def. Closure has a similar issue, and it uses extra type params `CK, CS, U` to capture closure kind, input/output signature and upvars. I use a similar approach for inline consts, letting it have an extra type param `R`, and then `typeof(InlineConst<[paremt generics], R>)` would just be `R`. In borrowck region requirements are also propagated to the outer MIR body just like it's currently done for closure.
With this PR, inline consts in expression position are quitely usable now; however the usage in pattern position is still incomplete -- since those does not remain in the MIR borrowck couldn't verify the lifetime there. I have left an ignored test as a FIXME.
Some disucssions can be found on [this Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/260443-project-const-generics/topic/inline.20consts.20typeck).
cc `````@spastorino````` `````@lcnr`````
r? `````@nikomatsakis`````
`````@rustbot````` label A-inference F-inline_const T-compiler
Use `is_global` in `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`
This manifistated in #90195 with compiler being unable to keep
one candidate for a trait impl, if where is a global impl and more
than one trait bound in the where clause.
Before #87280 `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` was using
`TypeFoldable::is_global()` that was enough to discard the two
`ParamCandidate`s. But #87280 changed it to use
`TypeFoldable::is_known_global()` instead, which is pessimistic, so
now the compiler drops the global impl instead (because
`is_known_global` is not sure) and then can't decide between the
two `ParamCandidate`s.
Switching it to use `is_global` again solves the issue.
Fixes#90195.
Revert "Add rustc lint, warning when iterating over hashmaps"
Fixes perf regressions introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90235 by temporarily reverting the relevant PR.
This manifistated in #90195 with compiler being unable to keep
one candidate for a trait impl, if where is a global impl and more
than one trait bound in the where clause.
Before #87280 `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` was using
`TypeFoldable::is_global()` that was enough to discard the two
`ParamCandidate`s. But #87280 changed it to use
`TypeFoldable::is_known_global()` instead, which is pessimistic, so
now the compiler drops the global impl instead (because
`is_known_global` is not sure) and then can't decide between the
two `ParamCandidate`s.
Switching it to use `is_global` again solves the issue.
Fixes#90195.
Use the "nice E0277 errors"[1] for `!Send` `impl Future` from foreign crate
Partly address #78543 by making the error quieter.
We don't have access to the `typeck` tables from foreign crates, so we
used to completely skip the new code when checking foreign crates. Now,
we carry on and don't provide as nice output (we don't clarify *what* is
making the `Future: !Send`), but at least we no longer emit a sea of
derived obligations in the output.
[1]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2019/10/11/AsyncAwait-Not-Send-Error-Improvements.html
r? `@tmandry`
Partly address #78543 by making the error quieter.
We don't have access to the `typeck` tables from foreign crates, so we
used to completely skip the new code when checking foreign crates. Now,
we carry on and don't provide as nice output (we don't clarify *what* is
making the `Future: !Send`), but at least we no longer emit a sea of
derived obligations in the output.
[1]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2019/10/11/AsyncAwait-Not-Send-Error-Improvements.html
Implement coherence checks for negative trait impls
The main purpose of this PR is to be able to [move Error trait to core](https://github.com/rust-lang/project-error-handling/issues/3).
This feature is necessary to handle the following from impl on box.
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> { ... }
```
Without having negative traits affect coherence moving the error trait into `core` and moving that `From` impl to `alloc` will cause the from impl to no longer compiler because of a potential future incompatibility. The compiler indicates that `&str` _could_ introduce an `Error` impl in the future, and thus prevents the `From` impl in `alloc` that would cause overlap with `From<E: Error> for Box<dyn Error>`. Adding `impl !Error for &str {}` with the negative trait coherence feature will disable this error by encoding a stability guarantee that `&str` will never implement `Error`, making the `From` impl compile.
We would have this in `alloc`:
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> {} // A
impl<E> From<E> for Box<dyn Error> where E: Error {} // B
```
and this in `core`:
```rust
trait Error {}
impl !Error for &str {}
```
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This PR was built on top of `@yaahc` PR #85764.
Language team proposal: to https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/96
This doesn't work properly yet, we would probably need to implement an
`assembly_neg_candidates` and consider things like `T: !AB` as `T: !A`
|| `T: !B`
Adopt let_else across the compiler
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
```
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
To simplify it to:
```
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
By adopting the `let_else` feature (cc #87335).
The PR also updates the syn crate because the currently used version of the crate doesn't support `let_else` syntax yet.
Note: Generally I'm the person who *removes* usages of unstable features from the compiler, not adds more usages of them, but in this instance I think it hopefully helps the feature get stabilized sooner and in a better state. I have written a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205) on the tracking issue about my experience and what I feel could be improved before stabilization of `let_else`.
Remove redundant member-constraint check
impl trait will, for each lifetime in the hidden type, register a "member constraint" that says the lifetime must be equal or outlive one of the lifetimes of the impl trait. These member constraints will be solved by borrowck
But, as you can see in the big red block of removed code, there was an ad-hoc check for member constraints happening at the site where they get registered. This check had some minor effects on diagnostics, but will fall down on its feet with my big type alias impl trait refactor. So we removed it and I pulled the removal out into a (hopefully) reviewable PR that works on master directly.
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
To simplify it to:
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
By adopting the let_else feature.
Add `const_eval_select` intrinsic
Adds an intrinsic that calls a given function when evaluated at compiler time, but generates a call to another function when called at runtime.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/issues/7 for previous discussion.
r? `@oli-obk.`
Prevent error reporting from outputting a recursion error if it finds an ambiguous trait impl during suggestions
Closes#89275
This fixes the compiler reporting a recursion error during another already in progress error by trying to make a conversion method suggestion and encounters ambiguous trait implementations that can convert a the original type into a type that can then be recursively converted into itself via another method in the trait.
Updated OverflowError struct to be an enum so I could differentiate between passes - it's no longer a ZST but I don't think that should be a problem as they only generate when there's an error in compiling code anyway
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #89298 (Issue 89193 - Fix ICE when using `usize` and `isize` with SIMD gathers )
- #89461 (Add `deref_into_dyn_supertrait` lint.)
- #89477 (Move items related to computing diffs to a separate file)
- #89559 (RustWrapper: adapt for LLVM API change)
- #89585 (Emit item no type error even if type inference fails)
- #89596 (Make cfg imply doc(cfg))
- #89615 (Add InferCtxt::with_opaque_type_inference to get_body_with_borrowck_facts)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `deref_into_dyn_supertrait` lint.
Initial implementation of #89460. Resolves#89190.
Maybe also worth a beta backport if necessary.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Consider unfulfilled obligations in binop errors
When encountering a binop where the types would have been accepted, if
all the predicates had been fulfilled, include information about the
predicates and suggest appropriate `#[derive]`s if possible.
Fix#84515.
When encountering a binop where the types would have been accepted, if
all the predicates had been fulfilled, include information about the
predicates and suggest appropriate `#[derive]`s if possible.
Point at trait(s) that needs to be `impl`emented.
Move generic error message to separate branches
This decomposes an error message in generic constants into more specific branches, for better
readability.
r? ``@lcnr``
Fixed numerus of error message
When there are redundant trait requirements and these are hidden, a message is generated by the following code snippet:
`format!("{} redundant requirements hidden", count)`
But if there is only a single hidden requirement, it will still print this message in plural instead of singular.
Correctly handle supertraits for min_specialization
Supertraits of specialization markers could circumvent checks for
min_specialization. Elaborating predicates prevents this.
r? ````@nikomatsakis````
Make diangostic item naming consistent
Right now there is about a 50/50 split of naming diagnostic items as `vec_type` vs `Vec`. So it is hard to guess a diagnostic item name with confidence. I know it's not great to change these retroactively, but I think it will be much easier to maintain consistency after consistency is established.
Coerce const FnDefs to implement const Fn traits
You can now pass a FnDef to a function expecting `F` where `F: ~const FnTrait`.
r? ``@oli-obk``
``@rustbot`` label T-compiler F-const_trait_impl
Don't normalize opaque types with escaping late-bound regions
Fixes#88862
Turns out, this has some really bad perf implications in large types (issue #88862). While we technically can handle them fine, it doesn't change test output either way. For now, revert with an added benchmark. Future attempts to change this back will have to consider perf.
Needs a perf run once https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/pull/1033 is merged
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Turns out, this has some really bad perf implications in large types (issue #88862). While we technically can handle them fine, it doesn't change test output either way. For now, revert with an added benchmark. Future attempts to change this back will have to consider perf.
Be explicit about using Binder::dummy
This is somewhat of a late followup to the binder refactor PR. It removes `ToPredicate` and `ToPolyTraitImpls` that hide the use of `Binder::dummy`. While this does make code a bit more verbose, it allows us be more careful about where we create binders.
Another alternative here might be to add a new trait `ToBinder` or something with a `dummy()` fn. Which could still allow grepping but allows doing something like `trait_ref.dummy()` (but I also wonder if longer-term, it would be better to be even more explicit with a `bind_with_vars(ty::List::empty())` *but* that's not clear yet.
r? ``@nikomatsakis``
Revise never type fallback algorithm
This is a rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84573, but dropping the stabilization of never type (and the accompanying large test diff).
Each commit builds & has tests updated alongside it, and could be reviewed in a more or less standalone fashion. But it may make more sense to review the PR as a whole, I'm not sure. It should be noted that tests being updated isn't really a good indicator of final behavior -- never_type_fallback is not enabled by default in this PR, so we can't really see the full effects of the commits here.
This combines the work by Niko, which is [documented in this gist](https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/7a07b265dc12f5c3b3bd0422018fa660), with some additional rules largely derived to target specific known patterns that regress with the algorithm solely derived by Niko. We build these from an intuition that:
* In general, fallback to `()` is *sound* in all cases
* But, in general, we *prefer* fallback to `!` as it accepts more code, particularly that written to intentionally use `!` (e.g., Result's with a Infallible/! variant).
When evaluating Niko's proposed algorithm, we find that there are certain cases where fallback to `!` leads to compilation failures in real-world code, and fallback to `()` fixes those errors. In order to allow for stabilization, we need to fix a good portion of these patterns.
The final rule set this PR proposes is that, by default, we fallback from `?T` to `!`, with the following exceptions:
1. `?T: Foo` and `Bar::Baz = ?T` and `(): Foo`, then fallback to `()`
2. Per [Niko's algorithm](https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/7a07b265dc12f5c3b3bd0422018fa660#proposal-fallback-chooses-between--and--based-on-the-coercion-graph), the "live" `?T` also fallback to `()`.
The first rule is necessary to address a fairly common pattern which boils down to something like the snippet below. Without rule 1, we do not see the closure's return type as needing a () fallback, which leads to compilation failure.
```rust
#![feature(never_type_fallback)]
trait Bar { }
impl Bar for () { }
impl Bar for u32 { }
fn foo<R: Bar>(_: impl Fn() -> R) {}
fn main() {
foo(|| panic!());
}
```
r? `@jackh726`
Lazy TAIT preparation cleanups
Check that TAIT generics are fully generic in mir typeck instead of wf-check, as wf-check can by definition only check TAIT in return position and not account for TAITs defined in the body of the function
r? `@spastorino` `@nikomatsakis`
fix non_blanket_impls iteration order
We sometimes iterate over all `non_blanket_impls`, not sure if this is observable outside
of error messages (i.e. as incremental bugs). This should fix the underlying issue of #86986.
second attempt of #88718
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Migrate in-tree crates to 2021
This replaces #89075 (cherry picking some of the commits from there), and closes#88637 and fixes#89074.
It excludes a migration of the library crates for now (see tidy diff) because we have some pending bugs around macro spans to fix there.
I instrumented bootstrap during the migration to make sure all crates moved from 2018 to 2021 had the compatibility warnings applied first.
Originally, the intent was to support cargo fix --edition within bootstrap, but this proved fairly difficult to pull off. We'd need to architect the check functionality to support running cargo check and cargo fix within the same x.py invocation, and only resetting sysroots on check. Further, it was found that cargo fix doesn't behave too well with "not quite workspaces", such as Clippy which has several crates. Bootstrap runs with --manifest-path ... for all the tools, and this makes cargo fix only attempt migration for that crate. We can't use e.g. --workspace due to needing to maintain sysroots for different phases of compilation appropriately.
It is recommended to skip the mass migration of Cargo.toml's to 2021 for review purposes; you can also use `git diff d6cd2c6c87 -I'^edition = .20...$'` to ignore the edition = 2018/21 lines in the diff.
Don't use projection cache or candidate cache in intercrate mode
Fixes#88969
It appears that *just* disabling the evaluation cache (in #88994)
leads to other issues involving intercrate mode caching. I suspect
that since we now always end up performing the full evaluation
in intercrate mode, we end up 'polluting' the candidate and projection
caches with results that depend on being in intercrate mode in some way.
Previously, we might have hit a cached evaluation (stored during
non-intercrate mode), and skipped doing this extra work in
intercrate mode.
The whole situation with intercrate mode caching is turning into
a mess. Ideally, we would remove intercrate mode entirely - however,
this might require waiting on Chalk.
Register normalization obligations instead of immediately normalizing in opaque type instantiation
For lazy TAIT we will need to instantiate opaque types from within `rustc_infer`, which cannot invoke normalization methods (they are in `rustc_trait_resolution`). So before we move the logic over to `rustc_infer`, we need make sure no normalization happens anymore. This PR resolves that by just registering normalization obligations and continuing.
This PR is best reviewed commit by commit
I also included f7ad36e which is just an independent cleanup that touches the same code and reduces diagnostics noise a bit
r? `@nikomatsakis` cc `@spastorino`
Fixes#88969
It appears that *just* disabling the evaluation cache (in #88994)
leads to other issues involving intercrate mode caching. I suspect
that since we now always end up performing the full evaluation
in intercrate mode, we end up 'polluting' the candidate and projection
caches with results that depend on being in intercrate mode in some way.
Previously, we might have hit a cached evaluation (stored during
non-intercrate mode), and skipped doing this extra work in
intercrate mode.
The whole situation with intercrate mode caching is turning into
a mess. Ideally, we would remove intercrate mode entirely - however,
this might require waiting on Chalk.
This just applies the suggested fixes from the compatibility warnings,
leaving any that are in practice spurious in. This is primarily intended to
provide a starting point to identify possible fixes to the migrations (e.g., by
avoiding spurious warnings).
A secondary commit cleans these up where they are false positives (as is true in
many of the cases).
Disable the evaluation cache when in intercrate mode
It's possible to use the same `InferCtxt` with both
an intercrate and non-intercrate `SelectionContext`. However,
the local (inferctxt) evaluation cache is not aware of this
distinction, so this kind of `InferCtxt` re-use will pollute
the cache wth bad results.
This commit avoids the issue by disabling the evaluation cache
entirely during intercrate mode.
Use explicit log level in tracing instrument macro
Specify a log level in tracing instrument macro explicitly.
Additionally reduce the used log level from a default info level to a
debug level (all of those appear to be developer oriented logs, so there
should be no need to include them in release builds).
inline(always) on check_recursion_limit
r? `@oli-obk`
#88558 caused a regression, this PR adds `#[inline(always)]` to `check_recursion_limit`, a possible suspect of that regression.
Remove concept of 'completion' from the projection cache
Fixes#88910
When we initially store a `NormalizedTy` in the projection cache,
we discard all obligations that we can (while ensuring that we
don't cause any issues with incremental compilation).
Marking a projection cache entry as 'completed' discards all
obligations associated with it. This can only cause problems,
since any obligations stored in the cache are there for a reason
(e.g. they evaluate to `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions`).
This commit removes `complete` and `complete_normalized` entirely.
Improve error message for type mismatch in generator arguments
Fixes#88653. The code example given there is invalid because the `Generator` trait (unlike the `Fn` traits) does not take the generator arguments in tupled-up form (because there can only be one argument, from my understanding). Hence, the type error in the example in #88653 is correct, because the given generator takes a `bool` argument, whereas the function's return type talks about a generator with a `(bool,)` argument.
The error message is both confusing and wrong, though: It is wrong because it displays the wrong "expected signature", and it is confusing because both the "expected" and "found" notes point at the same span. With my changes, I get the following, more helpful output:
```
error[E0631]: type mismatch in generator arguments
--> test.rs:5:22
|
5 | fn foo(bar: bool) -> impl Generator<(bool,)> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected signature of `fn((bool,)) -> _`
6 | |bar| {
| ----- found signature of `fn(bool) -> _`
```
Point at argument instead of call for their obligations
When an obligation is introduced by a specific `fn` argument, point at
the argument instead of the `fn` call if the obligation fails to be
fulfilled.
Move the information about pointing at the call argument expression in
an unmet obligation span from the `FulfillmentError` to a new
`ObligationCauseCode`.
When giving an error about an obligation introduced by a function call
that an argument doesn't fulfill, and that argument is a block, add a
span_label pointing at the innermost tail expression.
Current output:
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `x` in this scope
--> f10.rs:4:14
|
4 | Some(x * 2)
| ^ not found in this scope
error[E0277]: expected a `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<_>`
--> f10.rs:2:31
|
2 | let p = Some(45).and_then({
| ______________________--------_^
| | |
| | required by a bound introduced by this call
3 | | |x| println!("doubling {}", x);
4 | | Some(x * 2)
| | -----------
5 | | });
| |_____^ expected an `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<_>`
|
= help: the trait `FnOnce<({integer},)>` is not implemented for `Option<_>`
```
Previous output:
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `x` in this scope
--> f10.rs:4:14
|
4 | Some(x * 2)
| ^ not found in this scope
error[E0277]: expected a `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<_>`
--> f10.rs:2:22
|
2 | let p = Some(45).and_then({
| ^^^^^^^^ expected an `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<_>`
|
= help: the trait `FnOnce<({integer},)>` is not implemented for `Option<_>`
```
Partially address #27300. Will require rebasing on top of #88546.
cleanup(rustc_trait_selection): remove vestigial code from rustc_on_unimplemented
This isn't allowed by the validator, and seems to be unused.
When it was added in ed10a3faae,
it was used on `Sized`, and that usage is gone.
