Add TraitObligation::polarity() for better encapsulation

This commit is contained in:
Santiago Pastorino 2021-10-20 14:12:11 -03:00
parent 7568632513
commit 68d444ffa1
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 8131A24E0C79EFAF
3 changed files with 12 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -140,6 +140,10 @@ impl<'tcx> FulfillmentError<'tcx> {
}
impl<'tcx> TraitObligation<'tcx> {
pub fn polarity(&self) -> ty::ImplPolarity {
self.predicate.skip_binder().polarity
}
pub fn self_ty(&self) -> ty::Binder<'tcx, Ty<'tcx>> {
self.predicate.map_bound(|p| p.self_ty())
}

View File

@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
let mut candidates = SelectionCandidateSet { vec: Vec::new(), ambiguous: false };
if obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity == ty::ImplPolarity::Negative {
if obligation.polarity() == ty::ImplPolarity::Negative {
self.assemble_candidates_from_impls(obligation, &mut candidates);
} else {
self.assemble_candidates_for_trait_alias(obligation, &mut candidates);
@ -382,10 +382,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
for bound in matching_bounds {
let wc = self.evaluate_where_clause(stack, bound.value)?;
if wc.may_apply() {
candidates.vec.push(ParamCandidate((
bound,
stack.obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity,
)));
candidates.vec.push(ParamCandidate((bound, stack.obligation.polarity())));
}
}

View File

@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
if let Some(result) = self.check_evaluation_cache(
obligation.param_env,
fresh_trait_ref,
obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity,
obligation.polarity(),
) {
debug!(?result, "CACHE HIT");
return Ok(result);
@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
self.insert_evaluation_cache(
obligation.param_env,
fresh_trait_ref,
obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity,
obligation.polarity(),
dep_node,
result,
);
@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
self.insert_evaluation_cache(
obligation.param_env,
fresh_trait_ref,
obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity,
obligation.polarity(),
dep_node,
provisional_result.max(result),
);
@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
let unbound_input_types =
stack.fresh_trait_ref.value.skip_binder().substs.types().any(|ty| ty.is_fresh());
if stack.obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity != ty::ImplPolarity::Negative {
if stack.obligation.polarity() != ty::ImplPolarity::Negative {
// This check was an imperfect workaround for a bug in the old
// intercrate mode; it should be removed when that goes away.
if unbound_input_types && self.intercrate {
@ -1130,8 +1130,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
if let ImplCandidate(def_id) = candidate {
ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation == tcx.impl_polarity(*def_id)
|| !self.allow_negative_impls
&& stack.obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity
== tcx.impl_polarity(*def_id)
&& stack.obligation.polarity() == tcx.impl_polarity(*def_id)
} else {
true
}
@ -1199,9 +1198,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
fn is_knowable<'o>(&mut self, stack: &TraitObligationStack<'o, 'tcx>) -> Option<Conflict> {
debug!("is_knowable(intercrate={:?})", self.intercrate);
if !self.intercrate
|| stack.obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity == ty::ImplPolarity::Negative
{
if !self.intercrate || stack.obligation.polarity() == ty::ImplPolarity::Negative {
return None;
}